The CBC Radio One news said that Halifax had just turned down the ads themselves.
I don't object, but I do think the ads are something of an overreaction here. Now, in the UK they were appropriate as they were indeed responding to a "hellfire and damnation" ad campaign from a particularly frothy-mouthed lot... not much different from Scientology or the Moonies, in my opinion, so a rebuttal telling people that they likely have better things to worry about than worrying about arbitrary dogma was reasonable.
Here in Canada, though, we really don't have that sort of public campaign. Indeed, in recent elections here anyone banging on the God drum too hard (like John Tory) tended to get punished instead of rewarded in the polls. (Sadly, I think this is more from nativist/anti-American sentiment reacting to the US's theology-driven politics than it is from sober thought.) So this campaign is less a rebuttal and more of a "poke it with a stick and see what happens" thing. That, or just a lame copy-cat.
Still, I think anyone getting upset over this is overreacting themselves. It's a difference of opinion on an unprovable premise, not an attempt to rip people off or get them to abandon their families or anything like that.
-- Steve
I don't object, but I do think the ads are something of an overreaction here. Now, in the UK they were appropriate as they were indeed responding to a "hellfire and damnation" ad campaign from a particularly frothy-mouthed lot... not much different from Scientology or the Moonies, in my opinion, so a rebuttal telling people that they likely have better things to worry about than worrying about arbitrary dogma was reasonable.
Here in Canada, though, we really don't have that sort of public campaign. Indeed, in recent elections here anyone banging on the God drum too hard (like John Tory) tended to get punished instead of rewarded in the polls. (Sadly, I think this is more from nativist/anti-American sentiment reacting to the US's theology-driven politics than it is from sober thought.) So this campaign is less a rebuttal and more of a "poke it with a stick and see what happens" thing. That, or just a lame copy-cat.
Still, I think anyone getting upset over this is overreacting themselves. It's a difference of opinion on an unprovable premise, not an attempt to rip people off or get them to abandon their families or anything like that.
-- Steve