Australian gamers speak out to politicians.

Recommended Videos

TacticalAssassin1

Elite Member
May 29, 2009
1,059
0
41
Hey Escapist. So following the very disappointing situation in Australia following the refusal of classification of Saints Row IV, I decided to write the candidates of my electorate a letter telling them how I feel about the whole thing. The following is the letter I wrote; it addresses the NBN and the classification of computer games in Australia. I urge all Australian gamers to read the letter, edit what you don't like, add what you think also needs to be said, and send it to your electorate candidates.

Hello INSERT NAME HERE

I wish to inform you of some concerns I have regarding some policies and pieces of legislation.

Firstly, while I am an advocate of small government and less taxes, I do believe that a National Broadband Network is required for Australia to keep up to date technologically into the future. I understand that this entails a large cost to the Australian taxpayers, and that Labor may not be able to successfully manage the program, but I nevertheless am unimpressed with the current Liberal internet infrastructure policy. As a regular consumer of Internet media, I am aware that Australian internet speeds need to be improved, and this can only be done in any significant way by delivering Fibre optic cable to the home. I want you to know that if the Liberal party were to promise a continuation of Labors NBN plan after being elected, voting for the Liberal party would be a far more alluring prospect than it currently is for both myself and my peers.

Second, I wish to voice my dissatisfaction with the legislation "Guidelines for the Classification of Computer Games 2012". I am a strong believer in the right of adults to choose for themselves what they believe they will find suitable or not. The Guidelines for the Classification of Computer Games 2012 refuses classification of computer games that contain "Drug use related to incentives and rewards is not permitted." I do not believe that mature adults would be influenced to abuse drugs though the playing of a computer game.
Further, I object to the following criteria being grounds for a refusal of classification:
(i) activity accompanied by fetishes or practices which are offensive or abhorrent;
(ii) incest fantasies or other fantasies which are offensive or abhorrent.

While I do not doubt that much of the Australian population, including myself, may find media containing some 'fantasies' or 'fetishes' offensive, I do not personally believe that they should be refused classification. If the general public do not support such media, such media will not be financially viable and thus will not be an issue for most of the population. Further, the use of the phrase "or other fantasies" is vague and open to interpretation by the Australian Classification Board, which I have been disappointed by several times in the past.
In general, I believe that there should be a culture of freedom of speech, not of restriction and censorship in Australian media. The refusal of classification of media only hurts Australian retailers, content creators and consumers. I believe this applies to all forms of media, not just video games, though I am also concerned by the more strict classification of video games in Australia.

Thank You for your time, and I hope you consider my point of view and get back to me on your course of action regarding the above issues.

Thanks for your attention.

EDIT: I should mention that this particular message was sent to a Liberal candidate, so I added in the "small government, less taxes" to make it seem like I was seriously considering voting for him. Not that I'm not, but yeah. Change it up depending on which party you're messaging I suppose.
 

TacticalAssassin1

Elite Member
May 29, 2009
1,059
0
41
Bump.
(There's nothing in the Escapist posting Code of Conduct regarding bumping threads so I'm assuming it's okay.)
 

Voulan

New member
Jul 18, 2011
1,258
0
0
I did a little proof reading search, and the only qualms I see so far is that:

- You need to remove the capital Y in "you" on the last line - Thank you instead of Thank You.

- Internet is alternately written either with a capital or without, so stick to one. Otherwise, call it 'Internet Media' with capitals, and internet on its own without to justify the difference.

- The line "and this can only be done in any significant way by delivering Fibre optic cable to the home." should be "and this can only be done in any significant way by delivering fibre optic cables to the home."

- The line "Labors NBN plan after being elected" should be "Labor's NBN plan after being elected."

- The word "Second" at the beginning of the second paragraph should be "secondly" to keep consistent with "firstly" in the first paragraph.

- The second mention of "The Guidelines for the Classification of Computer Games 2012" should also be in speech marks.

- In the line "I am a strong believer in the right of adults" the word "right" should be pluralized. Potentially.

- The line ""Drug use related to incentives and rewards is not permitted."" doesn't make sense with the beginning of the line. Consider dropping the "is not permitted" at the end, or instead changing it to "Drug use related to incentives and rewards [and] is not permitted." so it reads better. Also, since you're using double quotation marks here for an actual quotation, change the ones used for the Guidelines title to single ones. So: 'The Guidelines for the Classification of Computer Games 2012'.

- The line "though I am also concerned" should read "although I am also concerned".

Otherwise, this reads very well.
 

Reven

New member
Feb 7, 2012
222
0
0
Only error i found the the person above me i believe missed was in this line "I do not believe that mature adults would be influenced to abuse drugs though the playing of a computer game."

I believe you meant to write "through" the playing of a computer game rather than "though" but aside from that well done :D and i hope it works as someone that is living in Australia.
 

Anthony Corrigan

New member
Jul 28, 2011
432
0
0
Sorry, could care less about a game being banned for turning rape into a joke, actually that's a lie I do care, I care that it remain banned.

Oh and "big government" sorry government exists to provide services, I care a lot more that government provide health, social services and schools. This is far more important than wether a rape gun gets a game banned