I also agree.Da Joz said:Same and agreed.TheNumber1Zero said:you have good taste in who to despise.AkJay said:Stephanie Meyer. And same.TheNumber1Zero said:whoever wrote twilight
mostly I hate the fangirls *shudder*
I also agree.Da Joz said:Same and agreed.TheNumber1Zero said:you have good taste in who to despise.AkJay said:Stephanie Meyer. And same.TheNumber1Zero said:whoever wrote twilight
Same here about Clancy. I used to love his books (there are some I still do. The Cardinal of the Kremlin reads like the perfect spy novel, and The Hunt for Red October is still fantastic), but, yes, I did hate The Sum of All Fears too. One sentence review: 900 pages of very little plot.Good morning blues said:You are aware that the original book Dracula by Bram Stoker was an epistolary novel, right? It would have been pretty stupid to write the sequel any other way (although I've never read Cary's sequel and would agree that there's almost certainly no need for it).UncleUlty said:Kate Cary, wrote an unofficial sequel to Dracula that played out like a bad fan fiction with the diary entry style writing, witch I despise .
I'll agree with the Dan Brown thing - the Da Vinci code was pretty worthless. It made no important points, and was the most ham-fisted and awkwardly composed thriller I've ever read. It used all of the most obvious methods of manipulating the reader and didn't give you any payoff for enduring it.
I also refuse to read any more Tom Clancy. I've read a few of his books, and it's really little more than ridiculous right-wing rhetoric buried in a sea of boring, dense, and excruciatingly detailed prose. I do not need an entire chapter dedicated to explaining, in detail, the process of detonation of a nuclear warhead. All I need to know is that the bomb worked.
Guys read it too.Chip7 said:Stephanie Meyer, again. Her books are porn for lonely, desperate girls and they're badly written as well. She chucks adverbs everywhere like confetti and her abuse of the thesaurus is nothing to be proud of.
I know that- I once saw one with a Twishite hoodie on- I'm just saying they're porn FOR lonely, desperate girls.Blackadder51 said:Guys read it too.Chip7 said:Stephanie Meyer, again. Her books are porn for lonely, desperate girls and they're badly written as well. She chucks adverbs everywhere like confetti and her abuse of the thesaurus is nothing to be proud of.
It was brox's axe. My bullshit alarm went off when I frist read that but I had to think about it.Ohten said:See, I don't think one character being given everything on a silver platter by falling ass-backwards into a save-all-existence plot and a loyal band of sockpuppets that only exist to accentuate how awesome the main character is constitutes a good story.frankenpimp said:I didn't really care about the whole Rhonin/Knaak thing. It made a for a good story. And I doubt any author hasn't portrayed themselves as one of their characters.
Keep in mind, given Warcraft's storyline I'm willing to give quite a bit of leeway on Sueish traits, but anything Knaak grunted out in the stall has gone so ridiculously above and beyond, with maybe the sole exception of the work he's put into the dragon Aspects and their respective flights, that it just screams "I cannot write personalities, so I just gather up cliches and make them incredibly awesome and hope nobody will notice." Need I also note that Broxigar, an orc warrior (and only an orc warrior) and another of Knaak's pet Sues, managed to injure the most powerful demon around, something that Aegwynn at the height of her power was exhausted by doing?
And you're right. Most authors will self-insert, but a good author will either hide it well, or make themselves a little cameo that plays a semi-imporant role like Clive Cussler likes to do in his Dirk Pitt novels. They won't make their main character a blatant wish-fulfillment self-insertion.