Oh yes, that old chestnut. Look, i'm not going to lie to you, i've stolen songs from the internet, a few games as well. Now while I'm not saying that it's right, I have my own justifications and reasons to do so. For starters more often than not there are two reasons for me to download something. I can't obtain it any other way, or it's being given away for free anyway.
In the first case i'm not able to find Gunstar Heroes for example. there are several reasons this could be, ie that it wasn't released in my country, cartridges of games this good are never hocked, and even if they were i would need a converter to play them. This is why the Virtual Console on the Wii is one of the greatest things ever. it circumvents this by offering the product, in a playable form for a small fee. after, of course, i pay for the wii
in the second case, and this is much more common with songs, is that if the song (note, not album, SONG/SINGLE) is played on commercial radio, more often than not the artist isn't gettin any money on that. songs are given to radio stations by record companies as promotional tools, like trailers in the movies. This means that I dont have a problem downloading them, im not taking food out of the artists mouth, and if it's good i'll buy the album.
However, i have been reconsidering this position due to the statements of one Kid Rock, who rather sarcastically has claimed that artists have no right to complain because they're rich (a common justification in several cases) and therefore it's ok to steal from the rich, Including software makers, car manufacturers and oil companies. This facinates me. Is it extreme as stealing a car? does it make you a common thief or a consumer of the new century?
discuss
In the first case i'm not able to find Gunstar Heroes for example. there are several reasons this could be, ie that it wasn't released in my country, cartridges of games this good are never hocked, and even if they were i would need a converter to play them. This is why the Virtual Console on the Wii is one of the greatest things ever. it circumvents this by offering the product, in a playable form for a small fee. after, of course, i pay for the wii
in the second case, and this is much more common with songs, is that if the song (note, not album, SONG/SINGLE) is played on commercial radio, more often than not the artist isn't gettin any money on that. songs are given to radio stations by record companies as promotional tools, like trailers in the movies. This means that I dont have a problem downloading them, im not taking food out of the artists mouth, and if it's good i'll buy the album.
However, i have been reconsidering this position due to the statements of one Kid Rock, who rather sarcastically has claimed that artists have no right to complain because they're rich (a common justification in several cases) and therefore it's ok to steal from the rich, Including software makers, car manufacturers and oil companies. This facinates me. Is it extreme as stealing a car? does it make you a common thief or a consumer of the new century?
discuss