Well, Amon looks like he could easily get interesting.shedra said:They still refer to Korra as "The Avatar". So not a huge deal that it's not in the title.
The new show looks interesting, I do hope the villains get more interesting than the anti-bending separatists. And I do hope the 100 years war still carries some cultural influence. Racism and nationalism wouldn't be absent in a world like that.
The long title is still Avatar: The Legend of Korra. Just like for The Last Airbender. Towards the end of The Last Airbender they referred to it without the Avatar part. I also think that this time around its not really about being the Avatar and more just learning about what the world has become because she has already mastered 3 of the elements unlike Aang who only had one down at the beginning. Which is also the only Element Korra doesn't know yet.JohnReaper said:I was watching the legend of Kora, and I started wondering why the hell couldn't it be Avatar: the Legend of Kora, then I remember reading something about the James C. Film being a reason, and this had me wondering why the hell would that matter
Avatar: the last airbender (Cartoon) came out first, then it was the JC movie, then the Shamalon Film, then this new cartoon, My limited understanding of law says that there shouldn't be a problem,
So does anyone know why the show isn't called Avatar Legend of Kora?
^^^This, this pretty much sums up the entire entire question. Nick would be right in saying "You know what? We'll just let this one go."senordesol said:Because Nickelodeon doesn't have Titanic, Aliens, or Terminator 2 money.JohnReaper said:But Scythian, that makes me scratch my head even more, How could Cameron even name it avatar with out issues? then they turn around and tell nick ((Who had the name first )) they can't use it on their sequel?
I think JC didn't 'tell' them to do anything, Nick just decided to pick its battles.