I was waiting for that. Seriously, does no one remember Jurassic Park?mikozero said:"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should"
I was waiting for that. Seriously, does no one remember Jurassic Park?mikozero said:"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should"
It does. It's different to what they were saying last time they decided they were going to try 'making' a mammoth, probably about a decade ago.BlackWidower said:Again, Immunity is unrelated to genetics (which is what cloning works with). It's related to the types of antibodies in the bloodstream.Private Custard said:So a creature closely related to elephants stands no chance of catching a modern day virus then??BlackWidower said:Immunity is unrelated to genetics. It's related to the types of antibodies in the bloodstream. So what you said is ridiculous. Besides, viruses only attack specific species. Remember the end of War of the Worlds? Yeah, you see that was a movie where they made shit up. There are no viruses on Earth that can attack Martians. There are no universal viruses.Private Custard said:Not a good idea at all.
Basically, they're going to create something that isn't ever going to be 100% mammoth, and then spend the next few decades poking and prodding it while it barely survives 10,000 years worth of viral evolution that it's ill-equipped to deal with.
I like this idea because it will show we can still use old tissue samples to bring back extinct species. You know the Bee population is declining? Bees are needed to polinate a lot of our food. So if they go extinct...we're screwed. But if we have a tissue sample in storage, we can use this technique to reintroduce them to the wild.
There are a lot of species that are being stored in underground vaults. It would be nice to know we might be able to do something with them one day.
Even a baby elephant at Twycross Zoo, here in the UK, got ill soon after birth. Imagine what will happen to a creature that hasn't had 10,000 years to build its immune system along with the viruses of the time.
I'm all for keeping tissue samples of important creatures of our time (the bee thing is a good example). But a mammoth.......what's the point?
No-one's offered a single valid reason as to why the mammoth thing is a good idea, when there are plenty of other creatures scientists could work with.
The mammoth is being born today, not 10,000 years ago and being taken out of hibernation. The immunities to various diseases we are born with are not due to our genes, we get them from our birth mothers. So this mammoth will get his immunities from his birth mother, likely an elephant or something. So this mammoth will be immune to all illnesses that an elephant is immune to.
Does that make sense?
There aremore than a few viruses that can jump the species barrier though, that's why everybody panics when a bird sneezes somwhere.BlackWidower said:Immunity is unrelated to genetics. It's related to the types of antibodies in the bloodstream. So what you said is ridiculous. Besides, viruses only attack specific species. Remember the end of War of the Worlds? Yeah, you see that was a movie where they made shit up. There are no viruses on Earth that can attack Martians. There are no universal viruses.
Call of Duty: Dinofare?PurpleLeafRave said:They're basically elephants with fur that aren't suited for today's climate.
Woop.
Bring back a Tyrannasaurus Rex and I'll be interested. You could win wars with that.
I fail to see railgun rex beating sharks with lasersJazzyjazz2323 said:Maybe strap a howitzer on it and possibly a railgun or 3?PurpleLeafRave said:They're basically elephants with fur that aren't suited for today's climate.
Woop.
Bring back a Tyrannasaurus Rex and I'll be interested. You could win wars with that.
Fallout 3 Deathclaw esque mind control headsets, of course!henritje said:but how do you top a T-rex from eating your own army?PurpleLeafRave said:They're basically elephants with fur that aren't suited for today's climate.
Woop.
Bring back a Tyrannasaurus Rex and I'll be interested. You could win wars with that.
Uh. How many well preserved small fish or lizards do you expect them to have from the permafrost of Siberia or similar areas?bubba145 said:A mammoth. why don't we try something that is easier to do first like a fish or small lizard. why are we jumping to hardest one first. work your way up people.
also we need some T-rexs in the military.
What would you say to me if NASA was sending a group of highly trained professionals instead of a ragtag group of oil drillers to do something about a gigantic piece of space debris that is on its way to Earth and I were to sigh "Seriously, does NOBODY remember Armageddon?!"GwydeanRunix said:I was waiting for that. Seriously, does no one remember Jurassic Park?mikozero said:"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should"
I think they're more interested in examining them in captivity than reintroducing them to the wild.Jazzyjazz2323 said:Uh why do they need to do this and does the mammoth even have a natural habitat anymore that's resonable?Because I can't see introducing something the size of a fucking elephant into an area like Alaska,Russia,or Canada without massive detriments to the environment.