So I remember when this game first came out, I remember people complaining about glitches and the like... People complained about how the rest of gotham felt tacked on... Well I only bought it last week and I've slowly been making my way through it (so it's been patch).
Can I say, and I've never had this happen before, that story wise this is EXACTLY how I'd write Batman if given the pen? Masked Vigilante, World Of Corruption, I love it. I love that at first when he doesn't know what the hell is going on he goes right to work shaking down Penguin for information. I love how when Bane gets away (I just reached this point, NO SPOILERS? PLEASE?) he blames it on alfred. They said it's a younger, less experienced Batman and he is, and I love it. So far I love how it adds to the two other Arkham games, I can fully grasp now what *MUST* of been running through Batman's head in Arkham Ayslum when he almost through that Batarang knocking Joker off his perch.
So I need to ask, now that it's been patched, what is so bad about this game? I know some complained the boss fights where all the same, just chuck a lot of enemies at you, but this is the first time I felt any Arkham game really switched it up. I'm a huge Teen Titans fan from the cartoon and I dug the hell out of the fight with Slade! Yahtzee I recalled mentioned the lack of a tutorial, but having played the previous two I actually found myself rather liberated that the game just gave me a bunch of tools at the start and trusted I know what the hell to do.
And the city itself, I think it's way better than Arkham City alone just based on the fact there isn't this prison/No Mans Land vibe to it. As it stands now, I can just boot up the game and pretend I'm Batman: Year One just knocking bad guys around.
So someone, justify to me how this game didn't live up to previous two? The only real knock I can think of is that it didn't do enough different, but when you got something good how much different do you want? At this point that only thing I really want would be able to drive the Batmobile and have a full living breathing gotham with Civilians AND bad guys ala Spiderman 2.
Can I say, and I've never had this happen before, that story wise this is EXACTLY how I'd write Batman if given the pen? Masked Vigilante, World Of Corruption, I love it. I love that at first when he doesn't know what the hell is going on he goes right to work shaking down Penguin for information. I love how when Bane gets away (I just reached this point, NO SPOILERS? PLEASE?) he blames it on alfred. They said it's a younger, less experienced Batman and he is, and I love it. So far I love how it adds to the two other Arkham games, I can fully grasp now what *MUST* of been running through Batman's head in Arkham Ayslum when he almost through that Batarang knocking Joker off his perch.
So I need to ask, now that it's been patched, what is so bad about this game? I know some complained the boss fights where all the same, just chuck a lot of enemies at you, but this is the first time I felt any Arkham game really switched it up. I'm a huge Teen Titans fan from the cartoon and I dug the hell out of the fight with Slade! Yahtzee I recalled mentioned the lack of a tutorial, but having played the previous two I actually found myself rather liberated that the game just gave me a bunch of tools at the start and trusted I know what the hell to do.
And the city itself, I think it's way better than Arkham City alone just based on the fact there isn't this prison/No Mans Land vibe to it. As it stands now, I can just boot up the game and pretend I'm Batman: Year One just knocking bad guys around.
So someone, justify to me how this game didn't live up to previous two? The only real knock I can think of is that it didn't do enough different, but when you got something good how much different do you want? At this point that only thing I really want would be able to drive the Batmobile and have a full living breathing gotham with Civilians AND bad guys ala Spiderman 2.