Batman Arkham Origins, Nowhere to run trailer...Firefly confirmed!

[Buizel91]

I'm still not sure why they're having a different studio develop this, they had a winning formula with the last two games. Why fix what isn't broken?

And the formula hasn't changed, at all. I'm assuming Rocksteady are working on another game (not batman, didn't they say they wanted to make a Superman game or something?), I'm assuming WB just didn't want us to forget about the Asylum games, and didn't want to interferer with Rocksteadys story, so they decided to make a prequel, which even if the fandom thinks is terrible, doesn't change what Rocksteady did.

..At least that's how i see it...this could just be another cash grab, and maybe all company's simply don't give a shit, but meh, if they wanted a cash grab wouldn't they just go a head and make the sequel?

 

[Sordin]

I'm rather exited. Mainly because I really love firefly and they've given him a cool look for the game.

 

[CriticalMiss]

I'm still not sure why they're having a different studio develop this, they had a winning formula with the last two games. Why fix what isn't broken?

Probably because it's cheaper and they know people will buy it even whn they bugger things up, because it has Batman and Arkham in the name. Hopefully they don't start churning out annual releases by alternating between studios like Clone of Duty. I have no problem waiting a few years between games as long as they are as well crafted as the two Arkham games.

As for Firefly, at least it's something different. Could be interesting to fight someone who can fly around.

 

[Eduku]

I'm still not sure why they're having a different studio develop this, they had a winning formula with the last two games. Why fix what isn't broken?

Probably because it's cheaper and they know people will buy it even whn they bugger things up, because it has Batman and Arkham in the name. Hopefully they don't start churning out annual releases by alternating between studios like Clone of Duty. I have no problem waiting a few years between games as long as they are as well crafted as the two Arkham games.

Yeah, I'm hoping it doesn't become the next Assassin's Creed in that respect.

 

[Buizel91]

I'm still not sure why they're having a different studio develop this, they had a winning formula with the last two games. Why fix what isn't broken?

Probably because it's cheaper and they know people will buy it even whn they bugger things up, because it has Batman and Arkham in the name. Hopefully they don't start churning out annual releases by alternating between studios like Clone of Duty. I have no problem waiting a few years between games as long as they are as well crafted as the two Arkham games.

Yeah, I'm hoping it doesn't become the next Assassin's Creed in that respect.

Doubt it will, any road Assassin Creed games may churn out every year, but you can't deny they are very well made, the voice acting has always been great same with the graphics and how they showed Ezio's story. Admittedly AC3 was the weakest, but even then the game was still playable, and apart from a few moments (chasing Charles Lee...ERGH) the game wasn't terrible, it just felt a little unfinished (which is a feeling i dont get from the other games)