Battle to the Death! How Will You Fight?

Recommended Videos

kommando367

New member
Oct 9, 2008
1,956
0
0
Fire magic: Chances are the other person likely won't know how to fight with it AND I get to set shit on fire. It's a win win! I'd probably have to come up with a plan to escape the fire though; better learn how to fireball my way through a tunnel.
 

Aprilgold

New member
Apr 1, 2011
1,995
0
0
Longsword fight and I would win. Just fight on a field and were good. No fencing but I was taught to use swords. Anything smaller and I will ambush them, still hopefully win.
 
May 29, 2011
1,179
0
0
Don't you people have any imagination?

I pick battle to the death by starcraft. The computers will be rigged so that whomever loses gets blown up. The area around the computers will be rigged so that attempting to leave will get you blown up. (there will be a sign warning of this.)

If this isn't allowed for some reason I choose archery. I rule with the bow and arrow, and the vast majority of people don't.
 

PinkiePyro

New member
Sep 26, 2010
1,121
0
0
melee my aim is shitty plus I am not above fighting dirty when my skin is on the line

with me there will be lots of biting and low blows
 

Souleks

New member
Jan 17, 2009
151
0
0
While I would probably be best off with a gun because I can shoot at least decently I would probably choose melee because then I won't have to worry about children who play too much call of duty or old war vets. and I wouldn't choose unarmed because while I could probably take on a lot of people I just don't want to risk getting pared up against that 22 year old boxer or martial artist.
Melee at least I can have a fighting chance although I am not skilled with any weapon chances are they aren't either and I will be able to set an ambush. (If we can use sharp sticks and stuff in unarmed then I would go for that because I would barrage them with rocks and fight with a sharp stick if it was just tooth and nail then hell no.)
 

Riddle78

New member
Jan 19, 2010
1,104
0
0
Melee weapons. Firearms are just too neutral for my taste,since I'm untrained,and I don't get to chose my weapon or ammo. I at least know how to fight with melee weapons,and disarm my opponent. I'm not trained in melee weapons either,but at the very least they have to get relatively close,which will allow me to disarm them,parry,all that jazz.
 

Easton Dark

New member
Jan 2, 2011
2,366
0
0
Guns mean semi-equal footing. Anyone can shoot a gun.

I'm not expert with melee weapons. I can handle a bat? I'd be afraid if they have a knife though.

No, hand to hand. I'm a submission fighter. Choke them the fuck out.
 

Tiger Sora

New member
Aug 23, 2008
2,220
0
0
You guys are all thinking so small. Giant robot fight!!!
Thats the way to go about it, everything is better with giant robots.
Cue Megas XLR theme music.
 

brom0220

New member
Aug 22, 2011
43
0
0
I would go with hand-to-hand. I'm 22 years old, thin, light, healthy, and fairly athletic. I have used guns only a few times in my life, and never with moving targets. As for why I wouldn't choose melee, I don't get to choose the weapon, and I've had some martial arts training, which gives me a slight advantage over an untrained opponent, as I have another weapon in my arsenal (so to speak) to use and a better idea of where to aim. It would be safer for me to go hand-to-hand than to risk hurting myself with a weapon I am untrained with. I would just have to be careful not to fall prey to ambush, and if the opponent is better trained than me, oh well, then I have to innovate more than usual and follow the same rule that all life on this planet follows: Adapt or Die. Outclassed is outclassed, and there wouldn't be much I could do about that regardless of the mode of combat besides innovate further.
 

Zeren

New member
Aug 6, 2011
394
0
0
Firearms for me. I'm not too bad with a sword, but I would rather use a gun because I have more experience with them. It wouldn't matter the type either. I have some experience with everything from revolvers to assault rifles.
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
While I'd strongly fancy my chances in hand to hand combat and am more proficient in hand to hand combat than with melee weapons or guns, I'm not sure I'd have what it takes to actually kill someone with my bare hands. Melee weapons would help alleviate this problem. If it was a blade I could make a quick kill; but it if was a bat? I'm not sure I'm cold blooded enough to bludgeon someone to death. That only leaves firearms, so I'm going to go with them. I'd pick a hiding spot, probably perched up a tree, and pick them off once they got within range.
 

karcentric

New member
Dec 28, 2011
1,384
0
0
I'd pick a box of matches and a 10L tank of petrol and make sure I'm on the lower terrain...
 
Jan 13, 2012
1,168
0
0
What about the power of words. Most people can probably beat me in a fight but everybody can be talked down if your speech skill is high enough.
 

manic_depressive13

New member
Dec 28, 2008
2,617
0
0
Melee weapons. They're easier to run away from and when it comes to it they'd probably kill me more efficiently than bare hands. I don't fight.

Captcha: it's over.
How does it do that?
 

Hugga_Bear

New member
May 13, 2010
532
0
0
Probably sword and shield. It's a pretty niche thing compared to firearms where a lot of people are trained and although I'm no slouch in hand to hand there are a lot of people out there who are equally or better trained and have more experience.

So yah, I'd take up a sword and shield or nondescript melee weapons if that's the option.
 

Elementary - Dear Watson

RIP Eleuthera, I will miss you
Nov 9, 2010
2,980
0
0
Guns... It does decrease the odds for my surviving if they get a lucky shop, but I am a decent marksman with rifles and pistols, and my military training should give me an edge in woodand!

Unless of course my randomly chosen opponant is special forces...

Then I will just have a brown trouser moment and beg like a school child..!