The more I read about this game the more I have to agree with the other folk over at BF forums. This game is not BF3.
3 maps
24 players per map
multi format release
no server browser
download only for PC
Uh maybe I have missed something but surely a sequel to something should improve on what came before? So if this is BF3 then surely it has to be better than BF2? Apart from the graphics and possibly the frostbite engine (which I am still not sure about, mainly because I don't know just how destructible the scenery is.) Anyway this certainly doesn't sound like an improvement on BF2 and it certainly doesn't sound like BF3.
I think it's about time DICE stopped faffing about with all these daft mini content, multi format games; BF BC, BF Heroes and now BF 1943 and next year BF BC2. Give us the game we have been waiting for, give us a proper sold and confirmed sequel to BF2, call it BF3 and make it a proper game not some daft mini game designed to bleed cash out of the average gamer via DLC.