GaltarDude1138 said:
Spineyguy said:
GaltarDude1138 said:
USS Imperator, standing by.
Ironic for a country so vehemently and hypocritically opposed to the idea of autocracy to name a ship with the Latin for 'Emperor'. Were you going for irony, or did you just think it was a cool word?
Oh, I was just sticking a generic title (selected because of the country I'm from) before a cool-sounding name. Would you prefer HMS Imperator? RMS? ROCS? CSS? HMCS? FS? DKM? LÉ?
So yes, because it's a cool word. And no one really uses it.
You're clearly not acquainted with Warhammer 40k if you think that no-one uses Imperator. I doubt that there are any countries in this day and age whose fleet would contain a ship named
Imperator, it doesn't fit with our current global stance in dictatorships, and there isn't a Latino country, at least to my knowledge, that would openly admit to being under the rule of an Autocrat. I was simply commenting on the poor combination of an American title and a traditionally Imperialist name. Most of the ships in your Navy are called things like Liberty, Enterprise, Ronald Reagan, stuff like that, though I know you've named ships in French before, which seems a little odd.
The UK has (or had, it's been scrapped now) the HMS Ark Royal, which comes close to being named for the ruler, though usually we stick to naming our vessels either after specific, significant, historical figures (Prime Ministers, Kings, Queens, Military Commanders, etc), places (Penzance, Grimsby, Bangor, etc), or simply using names that sound virtuous (Tireless, Vigilant, Victorious, etc).
We do have some slightly humorous names for our ships though, we have an
HMS Quorn (presumably not named after the meat-substitute),
HMS Biter (nom nom nom), and even
HMS Example, which just sounds like someone couldn't be bothered to fill out the form properly.