Ah yes, i was just thinking that i remember hearing a few cases when in Afganistan when the order had been given to fix bayonets...i think it's a British thing, we like using bayonets.MaxMees said:They were pretty damn effective in the Falklands and they're still used now.
More Argentinians fell to the bayonet than bullets.
British troops are often found running low on ammo and being ordered to fix bayonets, to charge the enemy.
They're also the best bet in trench warfare.
They wouldn't use them unless they had their uses.
I did not even hear about it untill today and I was most likely still in the region at that time. Just goes to show you yes they are still practical.FiveSpeedf150 said:Actually... It was... I want to say a Brit unit, Paratroopers that did one in Afghanistan. Pretty cool to read about.era81 said:I had a bayonet lug on my M4 never had to use it though. My buddy was in a squad that had been pinned down and running low on ammo and by the time we got to them most of them had knives at the ready. I don't think an actual bayonet charge has been ordered since the Korean conflict.
well after that sun article...Superbeast said:http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article88661.ece
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0bd_1249524865
Seems to work well enough.
There are many modern applications for bayonets. They aren't dated as the bayonet itself has evolved. A modern bayonet works well as a "BFK" all by itself even when not attached to a gun.
Why get close and club someone over the head with your gun-stock/get real personal with a blade when you can jab them with the length of the rifle too? Much safer.
Problem is, when ur a basic level infantryman, a sidearm isnt usually available to you unless of course you are in a squad leader position where you are issued a sidearm to the best of my knowledge, then again i might be wrong and u may need to be in a higher position to receive one. Basically most soldiers are not issued one and those who are it is more of a symbol of authority (lack of a better term). Special forces are a different story as many of the carry sidearms along with their primary weapons and others. And throwing a knife in a combat situation i imagine would be very impracticable. I have never been in the military nor have i experienced any combat (aside from many years of target shooting and shooting training from professionals) but in a situation where you may be at best 15 feet from a hostile target, a throwing knife would be highly impractical even if you highly trained.AndyFromMonday said:It gives you range, but in closer quarter combat you might as well use the pistol. Really, bayonets are only useful if you don't have ANY other possibility.
You're better of throwing a knife than fighting with a bayonet to be honest.