I am immensely disappointed that Kingkiller Chronicles, by Patrick Rothfuss, has only been mentioned once. Those books are literally in a different league compared to most novels, easily the best two books I've ever read by a huge margin.
I have that very book, same cover and all, in my case. Some good stuff there.BathorysGraveland2 said:Contains every one of Robert E. Howard's Conan stories, set out in the order they were written, as well as some drafts and other unfinished works that were never published. It's a rather epic tome and the pride of my, admittedly small, book collection. He's also my favourite and most influential author, which adds upon it all.
spartan231490 said:I am immensely disappointed that Kingkiller Chronicles, by Patrick Rothfuss, has only been mentioned once. Those books are literally in a different league compared to most novels, easily the best two books I've ever read by a huge margin.
Im gonna go and have to mention The King killer Chronicles as well. A very good book series that at first glance, seems to have some overpowered mary sue as a main character; then the story shows you all the various ways he cheated, tricked, and just plain worked his ass off to get to where he is currently. The story is rife with intrigue about old fairy tale monsters and how they are real, as well as all the various secrets of the University. All in all, it takes the fantasy setting, but makes it "realistic"; I guess I could kind of compare it to The Witcher games(I have not read the novels, it is on my "to read" list). Much of the conflict in the story is created by people, rather than monsters.The Wykydtron said:The only book I really got super into within the last few years was The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss. 'S about this guy who is basically your typical medieval hero character but he isn't really. He goes out of his way to present himself to the world as this unstoppable badass when he's really one step away from a breakdown. He is talented don't get me wrong, he just uses a few underhanded tactics to push the point further. He passes a test with close to flying colours when going to this not quite magical university and afterwards he reveals to the reader that he had snuck into a few classes a few hours earlier to memorise some answers, every other action in his life is one sleight of hand trick to look better. It's REALLY good
I am in this exact same boat as you....Because all of this. Seriously.Johnny Impact said:I'm going to cheat and say about 1/3 of the books I read are the best book I've ever read at the time. Not so much because I'm always reading better books but because I just love to read. The act is almost more important than the content. I seriously can't pick a favorite or "best." Sometimes the best book is a heavy classic like Moby-Dick that I can feel culturally accomplished for having read. Other times the best book is the next in Larry Correia's Monster Hunter series because I just need to shut my brain off.
-snip-
Not sure I can point to any one book as a life-changer, something that altered the way I think. I've been reading since I could hold a book. Entering the strange worlds of others and letting them enter me is something I've just always done. I guess I could say I'm forever being changed.
One thing I do find is that reading -- even reading complete trash -- makes me smarter. Somebody misquotes Nietzsche, I might not remember the exact wording of the quote but I do know the book they're misquoting and probably have a better handle on what was meant. I also have an excellent vocabulary and never need spell check, for whatever that's worth. (On the one hand, how many people can spell lugubrious, or know what it means? On the other hand, how many people care?)
I DESPISED that book when I first read it. Of course having to read it in high school with a teacher who's point of view is "I'm not here to teach you, you are all adults and should be able to work by yourself with no help from me" probably didn't help. Since then, I have bought the book and my copy is now highlighted to hell, has notes in it, and I understand it more than I did. Which is to say I didn't understand it at first. I understood the concept of the catch-22 but the book itself frustrated me especially when after reading a chapter the night before walking into class and having to do a test that tested my understanding of it and required me to explain things I didn't understand. I like the book now but I'm not at that point of loving it yet.IFS said:Not sure about life changing, but Catch 22 is easily my favorite book. Its a fantastic satire of war full of absurdist humor, insanity, and genuinely emotional moments. Its the best sort of satire, the kind that makes you laugh but also feel somewhat sad.