Well, yea. The writing is witty and often funny, but without a good story it's just not my thing. So, I can really see why you would wonder why I don't care for Shakespeare. But, I just didn't like the few books I've read. I'm going to give a few of the ones people have suggested to me a chance though. Othello and The Taming of the Shrew sound interesting.jmoore4ska said:ajb924 said:It's not that I don't see how is work is good, it just doesn't intrest me. To be honest, I've only read Hamlet, Julius Ceaser, and Romeo and Juliet. But, aside from Hamlet, I hated them. The stories were bland and uninteresting, the characters were sort of boring, and the premise wasn't too great. I see how they were good works and would have been better had I seen them instead of read, I just don't care for them.jmoore4ska said:I just remember my class had a strange obsession with the pink rocks from Lord of the Flies. I think for some reason they thought it meant Piggy was gay...? Who knows?Matt_LRR said:I liked Catcher in the Rye. And Lord of the Flies, for that matter.
-m
Aaaanyway, I had to read "All the King's Men" by Robert Penn Warren for a course and it became one of my favorites pretty much instantly. Oh, also "The Yiddish Policeman's Union" by Michael Chabon for the same course. Both fantastic.
To the OP, i just wonder why anyone would hate Shakespeare...I forget where i heard it, but this quote is appropriate. To paraphrase: When you read Shakespeare, it is not his work that is being critiqued, but you.
But Hamlet didn't have those problems. The story was ingulfing, the characters were alive and colorful, and the premise was amazing.
You know, i think part of the problem is that so many people now go to Shakespeare for inspiration that his ideas now seem completely played-out for anyone that saw all the new stuff first. ...That isn't to say that Shakespeare's plots or characters were new even then. Lord knows he stole the crap out of most of the popular stories told back then for ideas, but he portrayed them and characterized them so differently for his day.
I really just like his use of the language. Take all of the story out of everything and you're still left with some of the wittiest and most beautiful words you can find. That's just me, though. I 'm aware that it's no shocking claim to assert that Shakespeare is good hehe
Ok, I will admit the Giver wasn't that bad. But mostly because I liked the society that they live in and alternate reality is always interesting to me.Veldie said:The book called The Giver I love that book