Well, its being developed by id, Bethesda is just publishing it, and Bethesda as a publisher has been pretty hands off, so its up to id to make it good or not, though the concept annoys me to begin with.Devin Barker said:Would be much more on board if it was done by LITERALLY any company other than Bethesda
To be fair, Quake 3 was basically multiplayer focused with nothing but a bot-style "campaign" for single player so... you're kinda inaccurate in your assessment. Also Q3 was EXTREMELY popular, still is actually...Flathole said:Oh goddamnit. And no single-player. So it has basically nothing in similar with the Quake games except name recognition. DOG.DAMNIT.
Touche'. I've only played Q1 and Q2, also played the demo for Q4 but it was kind of bad.Imperioratorex Caprae said:To be fair, Quake 3 was basically multiplayer focused with nothing but a bot-style "campaign" for single player so... you're kinda inaccurate in your assessment. Also Q3 was EXTREMELY popular, still is actually...
It was a fluke, actually. Quake 2 only received the "Quake" name because the developers couldn't decide on one and/or the names they wanted were already taken. This, being a sequel to a game that was meant to be full-fledged fantasy, but was converted into an FPS.Headsprouter said:They probably moved over to extraterrestrial threats because lovecraftian monstrosities made Quake too similar to Doom.
Schizophrenic, and owes its existence almost entirely to id's need of a franchise to showcase their new tech.Hawki said:As I've said else, Quake is downright schizophrenic when you look at it as a series.
Wrex Brogan said:...So... Quake III: Arena: MOBA edition? I can get behind that.
Actually Fallout is one of my problems with Bethesda, its just an ES reskin. I dont need to play the same game over and over with a new hat on it. While in this case it is not a reskin it is still exactly like several other games that are already out and I dont see what this can add to the mix to make it at all interesting.Saelune said:Well, its being developed by id, Bethesda is just publishing it, and Bethesda as a publisher has been pretty hands off, so its up to id to make it good or not, though the concept annoys me to begin with.Devin Barker said:Would be much more on board if it was done by LITERALLY any company other than Bethesda
If Bethesda the developer were making it, Id be on board...cause it would be a gothic open-world action shooter RPG, like Fallout 4, but with more monsters.
*shrugs* I -love- the Bethesda style, and like the Dynasty Warriors style, I often wish for different settings or worlds to get such a paintjob.Devin Barker said:Actually Fallout is one of my problems with Bethesda, its just an ES reskin. I dont need to play the same game over and over with a new hat on it. While in this case it is not a reskin it is still exactly like several other games that are already out and I dont see what this can add to the mix to make it at all interesting.Saelune said:Well, its being developed by id, Bethesda is just publishing it, and Bethesda as a publisher has been pretty hands off, so its up to id to make it good or not, though the concept annoys me to begin with.Devin Barker said:Would be much more on board if it was done by LITERALLY any company other than Bethesda
If Bethesda the developer were making it, Id be on board...cause it would be a gothic open-world action shooter RPG, like Fallout 4, but with more monsters.
Gearran said:I remember the old Quake games (the good and the bad. And Quake 4.).
I mean, if we're being realistic with ourselves, we should just come to terms with the fact that id doesn't really show off their big stuff until Quakecon. Sure, they may tease a few things here and there, but it's not until Quakecon that they roll out the 'real' reveals.While I'm quite interested, I'm gonna withhold judgement and see what else they tell us at Quakecon. We'll see where it goes.