So do most YouTube celebrities.Lizmichi said:She's had death threats as well I believe.
Unless blood was spilled, I'm not interested.
So do most YouTube celebrities.Lizmichi said:She's had death threats as well I believe.
Pretty much somes it up. Aggro 13 year old teeny-boppers crying that there isn't more gold hanging off his neck then Snoop Dogg in a Jewlery store. (Excluding the fact its a Grammy figure, not an actual medal)Irridium said:Thats so... childish. Although given his fan-base, I can't say I'm surprised.
Just stating a fact is as all, not expecting that to do anything.Dags90 said:So do most YouTube celebrities.Lizmichi said:She's had death threats as well I believe.
Unless blood was spilled, I'm not interested.
The point of Best new Artist isn't about how well known the name is but how good the talent behind the name is. As for the sarcasm haha.Soylent Bacon said:I'm pretty sure Justing Bieber did DESERVE IT and that nobody has ever heard of Esperanza Spalding. I read it on Wikipedia, so it must be true.
A true artist winning a popular vote? By God, what has the world come to?! That place obviously belongs to JUSTIN FREAKIN' BIEBER THE MAGNIFICENT and why aren't you all kneeling before his 100-metre marble statue?Lizmichi said:Oh they are very silly. How can you hate someone with talent like this?crimson5pheonix said:Fun Wikipedia fact, apparently.
OT: Silly silly fans. You fans shouldn't be so silly.DAMN IT MUMFORD AND SONS SHOULD HAVE WON THE GRAMMMY!!!!
Eri said:While I agree she shouldn't have won since no one has a fucking clue who she is, I'd rather her over him. Lesser of 2 evils I guess.
There, I don't feel like typing it again.Lizmichi said:The point of Best new Artist isn't about how well known the name is but how good the talent behind the name is.
Aww yes yes she is. I have a soft spot for good jazz like this. I'm happy for her.Seneschal said:A true artist winning a popular vote? By God, what has the world come to?! That place obviously belongs to JUSTIN FREAKIN' BIEBER THE MAGNIFICENT and why aren't you all kneeling before his 100-metre marble statue?Lizmichi said:Oh they are very silly. How can you hate someone with talent like this?crimson5pheonix said:Fun Wikipedia fact, apparently.
OT: Silly silly fans. You fans shouldn't be so silly.DAMN IT MUMFORD AND SONS SHOULD HAVE WON THE GRAMMMY!!!!
I kid, the woman is amazing.
I knew who she was. I read her article in DownBeat magazine >.>Eri said:While I agree she shouldn't have won since no one has a fucking clue who she is, I'd rather her over him. Lesser of 2 evils I guess.
The Grammys have always played it fast and loose when it comes to awards. Where the Emmy's will give out life time achievements and nod its head to those who did good but didn't win, it seems the grammys bend rules left and right.Gxas said:She won best new artist, yes. But I must ask, why was ****** even considered for that award? He performed in 2009 at a televised New Years Eve party (Bringing in 2010). That was a year ago, making him a year-old artist, making him ineligible for this award, by my standards at least.
One hundred and ten percent agreed. They are absolutely amazing.Drakmeire said:and the winner for most predicable story ever goes to...
I personally think Mumford and Sons should have won.
Ya' know, I haven't heard of her till now, and after listening to that I must admit it was quite enjoyable despite the fact that I usually don't listen to that kind of music.Lizmichi said:Oh they are very silly. How can you hate someone with talent like this?
A 2011 award is for events that happened in 2010.ace_of_something said:Wait how long has Bieber been around? I thought his first albums came out more than a year ago?
wasn't the award for best new artist for 2010?
I don't get the grammys....