Bieber Fan Attack Grammy's Best New Artist.

Recommended Videos

Ziadaine_v1legacy

Flamboyant Homosexual
Apr 11, 2009
1,604
0
0
Irridium said:
Thats so... childish. Although given his fan-base, I can't say I'm surprised.
Pretty much somes it up. Aggro 13 year old teeny-boppers crying that there isn't more gold hanging off his neck then Snoop Dogg in a Jewlery store. (Excluding the fact its a Grammy figure, not an actual medal)
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
I'm not surprised. But meh, whatever the Bieber fans need to make themselves feel better. I'm just Justin will come out and say he's hapy for Esperanza winning and his fans should be too, then it will look like he's just the innocent victim of circumstances.

EDIT: I like how the one fan didnt even spell the Bieber's name right.
 

Lizmichi

Detective Prince
Jul 2, 2009
4,809
0
0
Soylent Bacon said:
I'm pretty sure Justing Bieber did DESERVE IT and that nobody has ever heard of Esperanza Spalding. I read it on Wikipedia, so it must be true.
The point of Best new Artist isn't about how well known the name is but how good the talent behind the name is. As for the sarcasm haha.
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,225
0
0
the makes me sad
>.> but sad is quickly replaced with an urge to kill

not even cause i like whats-her-face, never heard of her till the grammys, but cause its more stupid reactions from even dumber 'people' or infants, as the case may be this time
 

Eri

The Light of Dawn
Feb 21, 2009
3,626
0
0
While I agree she shouldn't have won since no one has a fucking clue who she is, I'd rather her over him. Lesser of 2 evils I guess.
 

Seneschal

Blessed are the righteous
Jun 27, 2009
561
0
0
Lizmichi said:
crimson5pheonix said:
Fun Wikipedia fact, apparently.
DAMN IT MUMFORD AND SONS SHOULD HAVE WON THE GRAMMMY!!!!
OT: Silly silly fans. You fans shouldn't be so silly.
Oh they are very silly. How can you hate someone with talent like this?

A true artist winning a popular vote? By God, what has the world come to?! That place obviously belongs to JUSTIN FREAKIN' BIEBER THE MAGNIFICENT and why aren't you all kneeling before his 100-metre marble statue?

I kid, the woman is amazing.
 

Lizmichi

Detective Prince
Jul 2, 2009
4,809
0
0
Eri said:
While I agree she shouldn't have won since no one has a fucking clue who she is, I'd rather her over him. Lesser of 2 evils I guess.
Lizmichi said:
The point of Best new Artist isn't about how well known the name is but how good the talent behind the name is.
There, I don't feel like typing it again.
 

Lizmichi

Detective Prince
Jul 2, 2009
4,809
0
0
Seneschal said:
Lizmichi said:
crimson5pheonix said:
Fun Wikipedia fact, apparently.
DAMN IT MUMFORD AND SONS SHOULD HAVE WON THE GRAMMMY!!!!
OT: Silly silly fans. You fans shouldn't be so silly.
Oh they are very silly. How can you hate someone with talent like this?

A true artist winning a popular vote? By God, what has the world come to?! That place obviously belongs to JUSTIN FREAKIN' BIEBER THE MAGNIFICENT and why aren't you all kneeling before his 100-metre marble statue?

I kid, the woman is amazing.
Aww yes yes she is. I have a soft spot for good jazz like this. I'm happy for her.
 

Berethond

New member
Nov 8, 2008
6,474
0
0
Eri said:
While I agree she shouldn't have won since no one has a fucking clue who she is, I'd rather her over him. Lesser of 2 evils I guess.
I knew who she was. I read her article in DownBeat magazine >.>

It was awesome, by the way. And she's quite talented. Although she's technically not a completely new artist either. I love the little jazz comeback, though.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Gxas said:
She won best new artist, yes. But I must ask, why was ****** even considered for that award? He performed in 2009 at a televised New Years Eve party (Bringing in 2010). That was a year ago, making him a year-old artist, making him ineligible for this award, by my standards at least.

Drakmeire said:
and the winner for most predicable story ever goes to...
I personally think Mumford and Sons should have won.
One hundred and ten percent agreed. They are absolutely amazing.
The Grammys have always played it fast and loose when it comes to awards. Where the Emmy's will give out life time achievements and nod its head to those who did good but didn't win, it seems the grammys bend rules left and right.

In 2010, the Zac Brown Band received the Best new Artist award, despite being musically active since 2002, and having released their first album in 2004.
 

ace_of_something

New member
Sep 19, 2008
5,995
0
0
Wait how long has Bieber been around? I thought his first albums came out more than a year ago?

wasn't the award for best new artist for 2010?

I don't get the grammys....
 

SilkySkyKitten

New member
Oct 20, 2009
1,021
0
0
Lizmichi said:
Oh they are very silly. How can you hate someone with talent like this?

Ya' know, I haven't heard of her till now, and after listening to that I must admit it was quite enjoyable despite the fact that I usually don't listen to that kind of music.

Screw Bieber fans, is what I say. That woman totally deserved the award from what I can tell.
 

One Seven One

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,123
0
0
Oh wow, seems like some people just can't except not everyone in the world loves Beiber.
That is pretty funny though.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
ace_of_something said:
Wait how long has Bieber been around? I thought his first albums came out more than a year ago?

wasn't the award for best new artist for 2010?

I don't get the grammys....
A 2011 award is for events that happened in 2010.

Stupid, I know.
 

Shade184

New member
Nov 11, 2009
367
0
0
"Immature", "childish" and "poor sports" are the only descriptions that come to mind.