Is there any other kind?Johnn Johnston said:I was so proud when I recently got my N64 back out and worked out an effective and simple way of holding the controller.
Is there any other kind?Johnn Johnston said:I was so proud when I recently got my N64 back out and worked out an effective and simple way of holding the controller.
The first seven or eight methods I tried. It turns out I'm not a very good beginner (or even a repeat beginner) at holding one.TheGreenManalishi said:Is there any other kind?Johnn Johnston said:I was so proud when I recently got my N64 back out and worked out an effective and simple way of holding the controller.
I SO agree with this!CyberAkuma said:The 25 Dumbest Moments in Gaming History [)http://archive.gamespy.com/articles/june03/dumbestmoments/] comes to mind.
If you have not read that article - please do.
I have a few selected list of mistakes
Not enough significant difference between the generations
Let's face it. The first Xbox360 games were not significantly better or better looking than the Xbox 1 games. (Don't believe me? Look at Conker for Xbox1 and compare it to the early Xbox360 games) It really bothers me that during the early release of the consoles the unit itself is extremely expensive, the game library poor and the few games that are out for said console are no better than the predecessor. If you it takes way too long time to develop games that significantly uses the hardware for what is intended for. The PS3 suffered from this far too much.
Just differnt ways to hold it. not to use all three at once..pantsoffdanceoff said:The tiny PC elitist inside me wants to say "existing". I think the N64 controllers and the weird middle handle that was jutting strangely to make 3 handles for people with 2 hands.
The main reason the Ps2 had a dvd player built into it was to get the Japanese public on board with dvd's because before the Ps2 it wasn't a big thing over there. So chances are that Sony were going the same route with the Ps3.oliveira8 said:The PS3 is one big mistake..har har har. But really I think Blu-Ray was a pointless feature. The Ps2 had the DvD player feature when DvD's themself were starting to make a name for themselfs, so the public saw a good deal, get a DvD player to replace their VHS player and a console at the same time! Ps3 comes with Blu-ray and most people go "uh?" (Also it was launched when there was a format war betewen Blu Ray and HD DvD. Only recently Blu Ray won the war.) Maybe in a couple of years it will change.
Maybe. I still say that the Blu-Ray came to soon.Heppenfeph said:The main reason the Ps2 had a dvd player built into it was to get the Japanese public on board with dvd's because before the Ps2 it wasn't a big thing over there. So chances are that Sony were going the same route with the Ps3.oliveira8 said:The PS3 is one big mistake..har har har. But really I think Blu-Ray was a pointless feature. The Ps2 had the DvD player feature when DvD's themself were starting to make a name for themselfs, so the public saw a good deal, get a DvD player to replace their VHS player and a console at the same time! Ps3 comes with Blu-ray and most people go "uh?" (Also it was launched when there was a format war betewen Blu Ray and HD DvD. Only recently Blu Ray won the war.) Maybe in a couple of years it will change.
Oh so do I. I mean VHS was around 30 years before dvds came along and dvds were a vast improvement over VHS. To me Blu-Ray just doesn't have that wow factor that dvd's had coming from VHS. Sure Blu-ray is an upgrade but not much of one. In my opinion.oliveira8 said:Maybe. I still say that the Blu-Ray came to soon.Heppenfeph said:The main reason the Ps2 had a dvd player built into it was to get the Japanese public on board with dvd's because before the Ps2 it wasn't a big thing over there. So chances are that Sony were going the same route with the Ps3.oliveira8 said:The PS3 is one big mistake..har har har. But really I think Blu-Ray was a pointless feature. The Ps2 had the DvD player feature when DvD's themself were starting to make a name for themselfs, so the public saw a good deal, get a DvD player to replace their VHS player and a console at the same time! Ps3 comes with Blu-ray and most people go "uh?" (Also it was launched when there was a format war betewen Blu Ray and HD DvD. Only recently Blu Ray won the war.) Maybe in a couple of years it will change.
Also to the average consumer getting bombarded with HD tv and right after Blu-ray, only adds confusion. They should have let the HD-DvD be around for awhile cause it sounded a better evolution of the regular DvD. and around 2012 release the Blu Ray.Heppenfeph said:Oh so do I. I mean VHS was around 30 years before dvds came along and dvds were a vast improvement over VHS. To me Blu-Ray just doesn't have that wow factor that dvd's had coming from VHS. Sure Blu-ray is an upgrade but not much of one. In my opinion.oliveira8 said:Maybe. I still say that the Blu-Ray came to soon.Heppenfeph said:The main reason the Ps2 had a dvd player built into it was to get the Japanese public on board with dvd's because before the Ps2 it wasn't a big thing over there. So chances are that Sony were going the same route with the Ps3.oliveira8 said:The PS3 is one big mistake..har har har. But really I think Blu-Ray was a pointless feature. The Ps2 had the DvD player feature when DvD's themself were starting to make a name for themselfs, so the public saw a good deal, get a DvD player to replace their VHS player and a console at the same time! Ps3 comes with Blu-ray and most people go "uh?" (Also it was launched when there was a format war betewen Blu Ray and HD DvD. Only recently Blu Ray won the war.) Maybe in a couple of years it will change.
I completely agree, I agree so much that I can't actually add anything to that.oliveira8 said:Also to the average consumer getting bombarded with HD tv and right after Blu-ray, only adds confusion. They should have let the HD-DvD be around for awhile cause it sounded a better evolution of the regular DvD. and around 2012 release the Blu Ray.Heppenfeph said:Oh so do I. I mean VHS was around 30 years before dvds came along and dvds were a vast improvement over VHS. To me Blu-Ray just doesn't have that wow factor that dvd's had coming from VHS. Sure Blu-ray is an upgrade but not much of one. In my opinion.oliveira8 said:Maybe. I still say that the Blu-Ray came to soon.Heppenfeph said:The main reason the Ps2 had a dvd player built into it was to get the Japanese public on board with dvd's because before the Ps2 it wasn't a big thing over there. So chances are that Sony were going the same route with the Ps3.oliveira8 said:The PS3 is one big mistake..har har har. But really I think Blu-Ray was a pointless feature. The Ps2 had the DvD player feature when DvD's themself were starting to make a name for themselfs, so the public saw a good deal, get a DvD player to replace their VHS player and a console at the same time! Ps3 comes with Blu-ray and most people go "uh?" (Also it was launched when there was a format war betewen Blu Ray and HD DvD. Only recently Blu Ray won the war.) Maybe in a couple of years it will change.
WHile techno freaks foam at the mouth for Blu Ray, the average consumer doesnt really care for being able to see if the band that Joker puts on the dude in the bank heist is black or purple.