Mustang678 said:
I don't know what world you're living in, ME2 was a fantastic game
Krantos said:
Bethesda got quite a bit of negative feedback about Oblivion, but it wasn't anything like BioWare's. Plus Skyrim seems to have won back a lot of them (though not all). There's actually a TES forum I've been going to regularly since Morrowind, and while there a lot of new faces, most of the old crowd is still around. We all still love the games, and, while there are complaints, we basically are just happy the company keeps making the kind of games we love.
That's interesting, because I loved Oblivion and didn't care for Skyrim.
Oblivion got a lot of flak from Morrowind fans for a number of reason (some good, others not). I've at least tried all the games in the series (Arena and Daggerfall are basically unplayable by today's standards), but Morrowind is the first one I've spent much time with, so I generally base my impressions of the series on that.
Personally, I think they're all really good. They all did certain things differently, and better, while maintaining the same core engagements.
Morrowind had great atmosphere, but, gameplay wise, was lacking. Oblivion continues to be, imo, the most aesthetically pleasing (minus character models), but was a bit generic and the enemy leveling gave it a wronky difficulty curve. Skyrim has probably the best combat and magic, but isn't as atmospheric as Morrowind and is considerably...er... browner than Oblivion.
Hardcore fans, however, generally think Oblivion is the weakest (like I said, some good reasons, some not). The reason, IMO, there hasn't been any fan uprising about the changes to the games (removing stats, etc.) is they still maintain the same basic structure: Wonderfully full and expansive world to explore with limited constraints from story etc. Yes the animations are a bit wooden, the voice actors are second rate, and the plots could use a lot of help. But the central focus that makes the games great remains unchanged.
Just my opinion of course.