Black Ops II: it looks surprisingly good

Recommended Videos

OldDirtyCrusty

New member
Mar 12, 2012
701
0
0
Mr.Grim said:
Jesus H. Bannana-Shit Dipping Christ! Am I the only who liked Black Ops around here? Compared to the story of most of the CoD games. I'd say it was pretty good. I never had any trouble following the narrative and it kept me playing because I wanted to see what would happen next. As for BL2, I'll pick it up. The setting and story have gotten me interested.
No, you`re not the only one. I thougt it was way better than the crap they started with MW2 storywise and it has
... dramatic pause...
a main character who`s finally able to speak, yes. That alone made me liking it. I always hated when as soon as you took over Mc Tarvish he seems to have lost his tongue. Silent maincharacters in games with talking NPCs are always pissing me off more or less and i doubt that your main guy is meant to be a mute. Not that this would be a problem when he would answer to everyone with notes, drawings or his hands. No reaction isn`t immersive in the slightest to me, it just increases the feel of just beeing a floating pair of hands.
Bring this up in Half Life3 and i buy a pc for it.
 

Swyftstar

New member
May 19, 2011
653
0
0
It's not surprising. They always LOOK good. That's what they do, they look and sound good and have great cutscenes to get your blood boiling and interesting set pieces to get you excited. Then you play it and you realize you just spent the last 6 hours snap targeting hundreds of faceless drones just so you could watch the cutscenes and hear good voice acting instead of playing an actual shooter. The last COD I paid and will pay money for was Modern Warfare II.
 

General Twinkletoes

Suppository of Wisdom
Jan 24, 2011
1,426
0
0
The setting is original for cod, but really not original. Neither are any of the designs of well.. anything.

And none of this will fix the generic as hell gunplay, which doesn't seem to have changed.
 
May 28, 2009
3,698
0
0
Tuesday Night Fever said:
and a huge amount of thinly veiled xenophobia.
From where? Every time you died in MW2 the quotes were choice selections compared to the random "war" related ones you saw in CoD4 and previous instalments. These selections were highlighting the dangers of patriotism, aimed quite squarely at the United States. At the same time all of the Modern Warfare games show the protagonists performing highly morally questionable acts as well as the bad guys.

OT: I never understood the hype about the zombies. Every time it's served as little more than a novelty. "Nazi Zombies" I saw in WaW. Haha, I like that. Then it got dull. "JFK, Castro, Nixon and McNamara team up to fight zombies" I saw in Black Ops. Haha, that's amusing. Then it got dull. There just isn't much to it after the initial novelty value. Black Ops 2 won't even have any historical precedent to base it off, which is gave the zombie modes the initial novelty value in the first place.
 

Darren716

New member
Jul 7, 2011
784
0
0
I'm not buying Black Ops 2 until after I'm able to play it for a bit to see if Treyarc actually did change as much as they promised and tried to fix the hilariously broken multiplayer from MW3
 

LordChhaya

New member
Feb 11, 2009
85
0
0
Am I the only one who thinks the plot is just a more retarded MGS4? At least the last few chapters of it anyway; Bad guy uses macguffin to take control of an armies weaponry and use it against them, lone badass has to stop him or something bad will happen yadda yadda yadda
 

Uriain

New member
Apr 8, 2010
290
0
0
Tuesday Night Fever said:
I'll take a stab at that, I guess.

So... we can mostly agree that Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was pretty decent, right? It brought the mainstream FPS genre out of the 1940's, had pretty solid gameplay even by today's standards, and had a story that was sort of like a Tom Clancy novel as directed by James Cameron with a Harry Gregson-Williams soundtrack to boot. With each game that's come out since then in the series, it seems like they (Infinity Ward in particular, but Treyarch is certainly guilty of it too) have been treading further and further away from the Tom Clancy roots and straying closer and closer to Michael Bay territory. With each new game the goal seems to be setting up the story to do nothing more than provide bigger set pieces than the last. The result is a shorter game that boils down to nothing more than a chain of set pieces loosely strung together by giant fiery explosions, the corpses of dead player characters, and a huge amount of thinly veiled xenophobia.

So I guess that's my answer. Each game ups the stakes over the last one, and that's more or less what differentiates them. You want to see bigger and more ridiculously outlandish set pieces in your Call of Duty game, you get whichever one has the biggest number at the end until you reach the point where you're suspending so much disbelief that you actually begin to feel physical pain (from all the facepalming, most likely). Story and gameplay only really exist to introduce various types of brown-skinned or Russian stereotypes (that you'll likely gun down without remorse) and string you along to the next big fiery explosion fest.

But who really plays CoD for the story, right? It's all about the MULTIPLAYER, man! In that case, you're paying $60 each year for new set of maps and some new weapon skins for weapons that are functionally more or less the same as the previous game anyway (see: MW2 FAMAS vs. MW3 Type-95).

And note that I actually like the CoD games. Sometimes I need to just come home from work, turn off my brain for a while, and smile like an idiot at all the pretty explosions.
This is pretty much bang on for the CoD series since MW2.

I also dont mind the the CoD games, and having a fun "brainless" time while shooting people is great. I just can't be bothered to spend 60$+ anymore after MW3 and the issues I had with it.
 

baddude1337

Taffer
Jun 9, 2010
1,856
0
0
It's quite an interesting take having a future CoD. Still, it looks the same as the rest. Alternate paths? Still most likely linear. Not like the fairly open ended missions that CoD2 had a bit of (The Silo, anyone?)

I am interested more in the campaign than multiplayer. As Michael Bay like as they've gotten, MW2 and 3 weren't TOO bad, but BLOPS was a pile of shit. Not even gonna touch the multiplayer, its been terrible since MW2.
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
Anoni Mus said:
MetallicaRulez0 said:
Nope, not being fooled by Fail Treyarch again. Black Ops was a giant steaming fucking pile of shit, and I won't put up with their horrendous hit detection again. Modern Warfare 2 for life.
Someone who says BO was shit and loves MW2, something's wrong with you.

MW2 and MW3 were the wosr cod's ever made in terms of gameplay (in general terms only cod3 is worse).
I agree about MW3 being shit, but what exactly was wrong with MW2? As far as I can tell, literally the only problem the game has is a shitty community that enjoys noob tubing. MW2 has mostly good maps, great networking (perfect hit detection! gasp!), and a well-rounded set of guns. Oh, and it has killstreaks that actually act like, you know, killstreaks. They're worth going for.