Black people aren't actually "black" colored, white people aren't actually "white" colored either...

Recommended Videos

DuctTapeJedi

New member
Nov 2, 2010
1,626
0
0
CannibalRobots said:
You need to stop thinking in Black and White, and live more in the Grey area ( I had to say it.)

OT: Our language is full of arbitrary distinctions that don't make any sense.
 

Breitenstein

New member
Mar 2, 2010
2
0
0
Some languages use their word for "blue" to describe dark-skinned people.
Or, for example, according to Wikipedia,

In Sudan, it is considered polite not to use the word for black, aswad, to refer to people's skin color. Instead, darker-skinned Arabs are called akhḍar 'green', while black Arabs and Africans are called azraq 'blue', as part of a seven-tier scheme for distinguishing skin tones that also includes "white," "yellow," "red," "brown," while "black" has derogatory connotations in Sudanese society. More commonly, the term "asmar" is used to describe males with dark skin. The female equivalent is "samra'".
 

staika

Elite Member
Aug 3, 2009
8,376
0
41
I don't know you should see my one friend, now he's white in a literal sense.

OT: Why do we call people black and white, well because thats what people call them and at this point its better to just roll with it then try to change it. Besides what would we call them now, I can't think of anything that would sound good or make any sense.
 

LilithSlave

New member
Sep 1, 2011
2,462
0
0
lucky_sharm said:
So why on Earth do we continue to refer to ourselves and other people like this?
Because any cultural norm that has ever been a norm is ridiculously hard to kill. Especially if it doesn't repulse people on a constant basis.

But maybe if we keep this up people will actually start using terms like "brown" and "pale" that actually makes a remote piece of sense instead of referring to people of European, Asian, and African into three arbitrary terms for colour and flipping out at anything that doesn't fit into these neat little nonexistent categories and calling everything else "mixed race" like it's actually possible to be of mixed race.

Because if you're actually going to refer to someone by their skin colour, do so and be accurate instead of calling that bronzed Italian American "white" and that pale skinned Goth girl from Asia "yellow".

Do we need picture examples?

Apparently, this is a "white" person.

And this, is a "yellow" person.

Could have fooled me.

And I don't even need a picture of Barack Obama. Everyone calls him black. But is that what his skin color looks like?
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
austincharlesbond said:
Fun fact; white skin is actually mutated black skin.
Fun fact: Everything that makes up you as a person is the result of a mutation.

That's not me being a prick and trolling you, that's evolution *nods*
 

intheweeds

New member
Apr 6, 2011
817
0
0
lucky_sharm said:
So why on Earth do we continue to refer to ourselves and other people like this? It doesn't make any sense at all. Wouldn't it be more correct to refer to black people as brown-skinned people and white people as light-ish pink-skinned?
Brown usually refers to East Indian people where I am. There is a large East Indian community near me though. In my understanding, aren't the terms self-identifiers? Meaning those communities choose which terms they prefer? I know a lot of East Indians which choose to refer to themselves as brown, but I don't think it's my place to decide for them either way.
 

gewata

New member
Mar 21, 2009
98
0
0
The KKK would have been much harder to take seriously if they all wore pink pointy ghost suits

Captcha: Tim interine
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
The OP has a point.

Also, lead pencils do not contain lead.

[small]Though, everyone that raises this point mentions the graphite, and forgets the wood its wrapped in[/small]

EDIT: Ok, I have to say it:

gewata said:
The KKK would have been much harder to take seriously if they all wore pink pointy ghost suits
That can happen, though, if they wash all their clothes at once, and the dye runs.

This is why they don't like mixing whites with coloureds.
 

Robert Ewing

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,977
0
0
It's generalization...

You need it, other wise you'd have to make billions upon billions of racial 'colors' to define one person...

The fact of the matter is, when you say 'look at a white person' You know exactly what it means... Same with 'look at a black person' you know who to look at.

White and black and Asian are perfectly fine classifications. So what if they aren't TOTALLY white or TOTALLY black? You still know what it means. You're just nit picking.

I'm fine with being called white. And most of my black and Asian friends are fine with being called Black and Asian.

I don't think I'd be fine with being called an 'Ivory puce male.' I'd hate that. And I asked one of my friends (Whom is black) if he'd like to be called 'chocolate brown male.' And he said "Hell no, that sounds way more offensive than just black."
 

ZeroMachine

New member
Oct 11, 2008
4,397
0
0
gewata said:
The KKK would have been much harder to take seriously if they all wore pink pointy ghost suits

Captcha: Tim interine


Anyway, for the sake of content, yeah... it's already been said. Why go through all the trouble to change such an arbitrary social norm? It would just be silly.
 

LeKiller

New member
Oct 6, 2009
59
0
0
lucky_sharm said:
So why on Earth do we continue to refer to ourselves and other people like this? It doesn't make any sense at all. Wouldn't it be more correct to refer to black people as brown-skinned people and white people as light-ish pink-skinned?
It's easier that way, and if people become more politically correct they'll say Caucasian and African American.
 

staika

Elite Member
Aug 3, 2009
8,376
0
41
gewata said:
The KKK would have been much harder to take seriously if they all wore pink pointy ghost suits

Captcha: Tim interine
Bravo your post almost made me fall out of my chair I was laughing so hard (Thank god I'm not in the library).
 

Spookimitsu

New member
Aug 7, 2008
327
0
0
lucky_sharm said:
So why on Earth do we continue to refer to ourselves and other people like this? It doesn't make any sense at all. Wouldn't it be more correct to refer to black people as brown-skinned people and white people as light-ish pink-skinned?
Wouldn't it be easier to just do away with meaningless labels that only keep us separated mentally and spiritually?
 

Slash Dementia

New member
Apr 6, 2009
2,692
0
0
gewata said:
The KKK would have been much harder to take seriously if they all wore pink pointy ghost suits

Captcha: Tim interine
And that would be pretty funny, too.

I think it's just a matter of it being easier to say. If we call 'black' people "brown", what would we call Mexican people? Sometimes-lighter-Brown?

Do we call Asian people "lighter light-ish pink-skinned"? It's much easier to not change what's already there, and people know what we're talking about already.
 

Trucken

New member
Jan 26, 2009
707
0
0
My skin is actually white. I have basically no pigments and burn like a ************ in the sun. So, yeah... I got nothing to add...