Existing players can refer you for a trial. Gimme a mail and I'll hook you upFurioso said:Understandable, and I would probably play ToR if there was a trial of some kind, but until then I'm staying with WoW, speaking of, why is a Panda so silly when you could play as a cow person from day one?
Hence the technically carnivorousPyrian said:They're technically herbivorous carnivorans. (Carnivora is their order, and while they do eat some meat on rare occasions, it's not enough to qualify as even omnivorous, nevermind carnivorous, as their primary diet is bamboo, 99% of their food.)
You're an idiot if you think that is the reason subscribers will dip.Stilkon said:Or maybe WoW players don't find the thought of playing as pandas appealing.
Just a thought.
I'm just looking forward to a more laid back expansion as opposed to the previous THE WORLD IS ENDING WE MUST BAND TOGETHER ones.Taunta said:Huh. Call me crazy, but I'm excited about both Pet Battles and The Tillers now. Now more than ever I really want that beta to come out.
Yeah, I don't understand the hatred. I mean, I don't necessarily like PvP (partially because I lock up like a deer in headlights) but its mere existence doesn't ruin the game for me. I just choose not to do it, and I don't feel like I'm missing out on the whole game.
Like I said, every time there's change in WoW, the game is "RUINED FOREVER".
You're right. Personally, i'm a faithful WoW player, but even I am starting to wonder "What haven't we killed yet?"Mydogisblue said:I'm just looking forward to a more laid back expansion as opposed to the previous THE WORLD IS ENDING WE MUST BAND TOGETHER ones.
Don't get me wrong, they were fun, but how many times can Azeroth get attacked before it starts to get old? I think three is enough.
I almost feel sorry to snip that very good post.Thoric485 said:sniped
Did anyone else get an out of the blue brain freeze on this statement?Andy Chalk said:After peaking at 12 million in late 2010, user numbers were down to 10.3 million at the end of September 2011,
As interesting as this graph is, I want to now what caused the dramatic dip to WoW east in mid 2009. That drop is positively grand canyon like.Thoric485 said:![]()
WoW has been declining since WoTLK, losing subs every patch. They staved it off with the Cata hype, but not for long.
Now they're entering the embarassing pandering stage where they'll desperately introduce all the gimmicky crap anyone ever asked for, in hopes of slowing the tide. It happens to every huge MMO - UO, EverQuest.
Looking at WoW's massive cultural impact, it still has a good 8-10 P2P years in it, but they'll be slow and unfruitful ones.
Yeah. In 2008, WoW barely felt the 1.5 million WAR and AoC pulled between themselves for a few short months. Even Aion's 4 million didn't cause such a drop. The trend was there before SW:TOR, it'll probably continue after it, seeing how MoP isn't really generating a lot of buzz.Knight Templar said:I almost feel sorry to snip that very good post.
Anyway, so you're saying that this is less because OF SWTOR, and more because of timing?
Their contract with their Chinese provider expired in June 2009 and Acti-Blizz decided to sign with a new company for higher royalties. Getting their activities re-approved by Chinese authorities took 2-3 months during which the servers there were down.Dirty Apple said:As interesting as this graph is, I want to now what caused the dramatic dip to WoW east in mid 2009. That drop is positively grand canyon like.
That's basically what happened to me. Five years of the game before I called it a day.FelixG said:I figure millions of WoW players are suddenly realizing "holy shit, this game isnt fun! What am I paying for?!" and dropping their subs.