Sorry if this offend you but do you have numbers to back your statement up? Without those little numbers your statement, is just a option.mikozero said:wows numbers (which are the basis of it being considered the elephant in the room) are misleading.
to equal in the markets that actually count you need to hit around 2-2.5 million subs
thats how much they have in the US and EU
China and the rest of Asia is where the majority of their 12 million is and its not the biggest MMO there coming in 3rd or 4th to MMOs most people have never heard of (neither do the Asians subscribe so the "subscriber figures" are intentionally misleading any which way you want to slice them)
the world rebuilding in Cata is about player retention and attracting new players EOD they have said so multiple times.
why ?
because they have had near flatline growth since 2008.
incidentally SW:TOR apparently has a launch target of 1 million subs. if it succeeds (which could happen) it could easily be the equal of WoW in the US and EU markets within 1-2 years...but even more interesting is the reception the a Star Wars MMO could get in Asia (especially Japan a market WoW has never dented)
You said "to equal in the markets that actually count you need to hit around 2-2.5 million subsmikozero said:/sigh
read the post again
i said "to equal in the markets that actually count you need to hit around 2-2.5 million subs
thats how much they have in the US and EU"
approx 2.5 million in the EU and US
this is backed up by this press release: https://eu.blizzard.com/en-gb/company/press/pressreleases.html?080122 from which you can extrapolate the basic cut.
to use your own figures and the US as an example 244 servers severs devided between 2.5-3 million (adjusted to predictable split from 12 million) would give 10246-12295 per server
I came across a good MMO a little while back. It was called Allods Online.rsvp42 said:Honestly, I just hope something can come along and compete with WoW because I'd like to play something other than WoW. I'd like there to be another big, fun game with a big budget and a lot of players, something I can enjoy getting sucked into. I'm hoping TOR can do that, but it can be something else too, if it's good. I like WoW. I enjoyed my time with it. I may even pick it back up for a bit to check out Cataclysm. But still, it'd be nice to see something new.
You can go ahead and pull your head out of your ass, now. Firstly, Guild Wars is far from perfect, it has plenty of problems and hang-ups that might chase a player away. Secondly, the two games are nothing alike. Guild Wars is a pure PvP fest where WoW was always more focused on its PvE content. Seriously, if you're gonna try to pass opinion as fact, at least compare similar games.Pirate Kitty said:I didn't say it could outsell or "Dethrone" WoW.King_Burger said:No it wasnt Guild Wars never was a serious threat to WoW and it never will be.Pirate Kitty said:Guild Wars beat World of Warcraft out of the gate.
The former was always a better game.
The only thing that can Dethrone WoW is Blizzard itself I think its new MMORPG or Diablo 3 are the only things in the near future that could possibly have an impact. And still after toying around with D3 for a month or two they will most likely return to WoW.
I said it is a better game.
I didn't mean to imply that you said it was perfect, I was just pointing out that someone could just as easily say "WoW beat-out Guild Wars on the long-term because WoW is just a better game". Oh, and also:Pirate Kitty said:Lol. Didn't say it was perfect - no game is.
Also, lest I checked, it was an opinion.
Granted that you weren't bashing on WoW in either of the posts that I quoted, but otherwise you fall right into the underdog loyalist category. They prefer the game with a much smaller cult following compared to one big-name title in the same genre, and anytime they speak their opinion on the matter it's just plain fact that their game is better than the popular game; and if anyone calls them out for saying it's better, then they fall-back back on the tried-and-true "opinion defense" despite the fact that they clearly stated their "opinion" as a fact.Underdog loyalist? XD I prefer one game over another and suddenly I blindly bash the mainstream? I think someone's trying a little hard![]()