Bolivia's Jenine Áñez finally allows election effectively at gunpoint, loses and is going to jail

Recommended Videos

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,660
978
118
Country
USA
Moving on...
I'm genuinely not reading the rest of your post if you don't acknowledge this. The part you underlined literally doesn't say what you're claiming it does, and I already explained the difference.
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
13,054
6,748
118
Country
United Kingdom
I'm genuinely not reading the rest of your post if you don't acknowledge this. The part you underlined literally doesn't say what you're claiming it does, and I already explained the difference.
Ah, so one can violate the law without breaking it? I wonder if that'll fly next time I'm pulled over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMysteriousGX

crimson5pheonix

It took 6 months to read my title.
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
36,678
3,877
118
I'm genuinely not reading the rest of your post if you don't acknowledge this. The part you underlined literally doesn't say what you're claiming it does, and I already explained the difference.
You're genuinely not going to own up to your faulty logic based on your emotions more than any rational reading of the situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seanchaidh

crimson5pheonix

It took 6 months to read my title.
Legacy
Jun 6, 2008
36,678
3,877
118

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,660
978
118
Country
USA

I promised she was going to jail in the title and Bolivia delivers.
24 hours after they granted blanket Amnesty to their supporters for any crimes committed while she was president. Congratulations, you are cheering on a failed state.
 

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,580
7,215
118
Country
United States
24 hours after they granted blanket Amnesty to their supporters for any crimes committed while she was president. Congratulations, you are cheering on a failed state.
I mean, it'd be pretty stupid to put all your freedom fighters behind bars.
Imagine trying to put the United States together after summarily executing all your traitors to the crown.
 

Seanchaidh

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 21, 2009
6,132
3,706
118
Country
United States of America
Regrettably, Human Rights Watch isn't a reliable source.

 
  • Like
Reactions: crimson5pheonix

Seanchaidh

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 21, 2009
6,132
3,706
118
Country
United States of America
You really need to diversify your sources to include people who don't forwardly support communists.
I literally have posted links to NYT (and probably CNN and MSNBC) here before, what are you smoking?

HRW’s executive director, Ken Roth, made a series of public statements on social media expressing his delight, even as security forces took over La Paz, massacring civilians and overthrowing a democratically-elected president. Roth also described the coup approvingly as an “uprising” and a “transitional moment” for Bolivia, while presenting Morales as an out-of-touch “strongman.” For Roth, Morales was “the casualty of a counter-revolution aimed at defending democracy…against electoral fraud and his own illegal candidacy,” falsely alleging that Morales had ordered the army to shoot protesters.


As Roth was making his pronouncements, Añez was signing a new law that gave security forces complete immunity for killing dissenters. HRW described this as a “problematic decree,” as if Añez had merely used insensitive language. The organization also attempted to hide who were the perpetrators of the ensuing massacres, telling readers that “nine people died and 122 were wounded” during a Cochabamba demonstration, but refusing to fill them in on who was dying and who was shooting.
Human Rights Watch is funded by billionaires. Its coverage of events reflects that bias.