Boobquake: For Science!

Recommended Videos

spinFX

New member
Aug 18, 2008
490
0
0
Akira Fumi said:
It's about time they showed us what's under all that clothing!
You think anyone in a fundamentalist Muslim country will participate? Ha! No way. They'll be stoned, arrested or ridiculed depending on the degree of fundamentalism in that country.
 

Good morning blues

New member
Sep 24, 2008
2,664
0
0
This is seriously the best idea for a protest I've heard in months, and that's not even coming from a "HEH HEH HEH TITTIES" perspective. I hope it catches on, and I hope this dickwad spends the day cowering in his basement in fear of divine retribution against sideboob.
 

Vitor Goncalves

New member
Mar 22, 2010
1,157
0
0
marter said:
This is meant as a joke on her part right?? Just to prove a point that scantily clad women cannot influence Mother Nature? If so, she might as well go for it, as it won't cause any harm.

Except maybe low productivity wherever she goes...
Actually might cause some casualties at construction sites as workers disregard safety measures. :p
 

Meander112

Spiritual Scientific Skeptic
Jan 26, 2010
90
0
0
Paksenarrion said:
If you think about it, I'd be a little bit insulted if my boobs *didn't* cause an earthquake...
*arches eyebrow* Why do you say that, my dear girl?
 

kurupt87

Fuhuhzucking hellcocks I'm good
Mar 17, 2010
1,438
0
0
I approve of this. Making close-minded fools look foolish and skantily clad women being skantily clad, this is all good stuff.

Imagine if an earthquake did happen coincidentally though, that'd be funny as hell. Tragic, but funny.
 

Paksenarrion

New member
Mar 13, 2009
2,911
0
0
Meander112 said:
Paksenarrion said:
If you think about it, I'd be a little bit insulted if my boobs *didn't* cause an earthquake...
*arches eyebrow* Why do you say that, my dear girl?
Replace boobs with penis, and voila! Relevant to guys.
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
Forget the side boob hour. This is the side boob day!

Bring on the jiggerling moist spheres that raise my pulse and pants...FOR SCIENCE!
 

Enigmers

New member
Dec 14, 2008
1,745
0
0
PrototypeC said:
If anybody wants to do any corrupting in Canada, I know a few people available...
but Canada rarely has earthquakes, so we must be the holiest people on earth!

Well, at least, my part of Canada.
 

enzilewulf

New member
Jun 19, 2009
2,130
0
0
I finally found something stupider than Astrology. Who ever thinks this needs help. I mean serious HELP
 

Meander112

Spiritual Scientific Skeptic
Jan 26, 2010
90
0
0
Paksenarrion said:
Replace boobs with penis, and voila! Relevant to guys.
Hmmm. There's a certain valididity to that, but it's sort of like comparing apples (boobs are secondary sexual characteristics) to oranges (penises are primary sexual characteristics). Of couse, the person who started Boobquake did say that girls wearing short-shorts would work just as well as a low-cut top.

For Science!
 

Lavi

New member
Sep 20, 2008
692
0
0
Tell all your friends ;D I'll be showing off my cleavage come Monday!
 

Paksenarrion

New member
Mar 13, 2009
2,911
0
0
Meander112 said:
Paksenarrion said:
Replace boobs with penis, and voila! Relevant to guys.
Hmmm. There's a certain valididity to that, but it's sort of like comparing apples (boobs are secondary sexual characteristics) to oranges (penises are primary sexual characteristics). Of couse, the person who started Boobquake did say that girls wearing short-shorts would work just as well as a low-cut top.

For Science!
The comparison is based on perceived primary attractors: according to contemporary media, the size of one's package, be it chest or groin, determines one's success in passing on their genes to the next generation.

To summarize, perhaps the guys should wear tight jeans on that day, as well.
 

Meander112

Spiritual Scientific Skeptic
Jan 26, 2010
90
0
0
Paksenarrion said:
Meander112 said:
Paksenarrion said:
Replace boobs with penis, and voila! Relevant to guys.
Hmmm. There's a certain valididity to that, but it's sort of like comparing apples (boobs are secondary sexual characteristics) to oranges (penises are primary sexual characteristics). Of couse, the person who started Boobquake did say that girls wearing short-shorts would work just as well as a low-cut top.

For Science!
The comparison is based on perceived primary attractors: according to contemporary media, the size of one's package, be it chest or groin, determines one's success in passing on their genes to the next generation.

To summarize, perhaps the guys should wear tight jeans on that day, as well.
AFAIK, the most obvious visual characteristics that women notice on men are the ratio of their shoulders to their waist and the quality of their bottom. I think that's from The Ascent of Man. Of course, even if that is the case, then tight jeans are still in!

Of course, the Islamic premise that inspiried this whole thing is based on the inherent misogyny that pervades that religion.
 

Paksenarrion

New member
Mar 13, 2009
2,911
0
0
Meander112 said:
Paksenarrion said:
Meander112 said:
Paksenarrion said:
Replace boobs with penis, and voila! Relevant to guys.
Hmmm. There's a certain valididity to that, but it's sort of like comparing apples (boobs are secondary sexual characteristics) to oranges (penises are primary sexual characteristics). Of couse, the person who started Boobquake did say that girls wearing short-shorts would work just as well as a low-cut top.

For Science!
The comparison is based on perceived primary attractors: according to contemporary media, the size of one's package, be it chest or groin, determines one's success in passing on their genes to the next generation.

To summarize, perhaps the guys should wear tight jeans on that day, as well.
AFAIK, the most obvious visual characteristics that women notice on men are the ratio of their shoulders to their waist and the quality of their bottom. I think that's from The Ascent of Man. Of course, even if that is the case, then tight jeans are still in!

Of course, the Islamic premise that inspired this whole thing is based on the inherent misogyny that pervades that religion.
I apologize; I meant to say, socially perceived primary attractors: what our society tells us is important, however shallow or irrelevant it may be.

But yes, as the Spartans were known to say, "High fives for the women, open mouthed tongue kisses for the men!" That's misogyny for you. ^_^
 

Meander112

Spiritual Scientific Skeptic
Jan 26, 2010
90
0
0
Paksenarrion said:
But yes, as the Spartans were known to say, "High fives for the women, open mouthed tongue kisses for the men!" That's misogyny for you. ^_^
You know, I'd be interested to know where you got this quote from. Hehe. ;-)