Wondered if someone would mention this. I was never ridiculed for reading Redwell, I was actually on the other side. I tried to point out how stupid it was that fuzzy woodland creatures would hack into each other with battleaxes. Then when I was 11 I represented my school at a book quiz of all things and as chances would have it I won a couple of books. One of those books was Redwall. I gave it a chance and was captivated. So I learned not to ridicule others' book choices._Depression said:Made an account just to post this:
Every book in the Redwall series. Apparently whenever someone hears about a fantasy story including anthropomorphic woodland creatures, it has to be for children. No one listens to me when I warn them not to read the books on an empty stomach, and that there is more blood shed in a single Redwall book than in a Tony Hawk game with the extra blood cheat code on.
You could always read about a gig of Anne Rice fanfiction written by a socially inept middle school girl. It's pretty much the same thing.Superior Mind said:I don't think I've ever been ridiculed for books that I've read. Except Twilight and I was only ridiculed by myself. Fucking waste of time. After my Redwall experience I only wanted to qualify my criticisms of the Twilight phenomenon by saying that I'd at least read the books. I've read the first one, I couldn't get any further. I still aim to finish the whole awful lot of them but I know the story and I know the style of writing so I figure I can at least keep up my mockery of that whole thing legitimately.
Same. I got ridiculed for reading Twilight for no particular reason. People (and I use the term people lightly here) fail to understand that just because a book has a target demographic doesn't mean other can't read it._Depression said:Made an account just to post this: