The Austin said:
[HEADING=1]
Anti-religious bullshit incoming! Take cover!
[/HEADING]
Anyway, now that that mandatory thingy-majigger is over, I'm going to go for the exact opposite of what I just warned about. I think that Richard Dawkins'
The God Dilemma needs to get burned. Why? Because I'm allowed to believe what I want, and having a book calling me a dumbass isn't going to change my mind.
Is it
really so wrong that I believe in something rather primitive? No sir, no it is not. It may be primitive, silly, all around unlikely, but you know what? It makes me happy. So I reserve the right to believe that there is an invisible man in the sky.
Dawkins never wrote a book called
The God Dilemma. He did, however, write one called
The God Delusion. I sure am glad you want an imaginary book burned and not one of my favorite books of all time.
I don't think you're wrong for believing in a magic sky daddy, but I do believe that it is foolish based on objective evidence. You may have subjective evidence, though, of which I can say nothing about.
I'll vote any book claiming a magic sky daddy. Oh, and a book I picked up the other day to read and refute called
The Collapse of Evolution. Shit, creationists are stupid.