Braid Creator: New Xbox "Not a Good Choice" for The Witness

Recommended Videos

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Nurb said:
I've yet to be convinced the new generation isn't going to be the end of gaming libraries as things become more digital and gamers own less and less of what they pay for. Sony's pushing for that hardest right now.
I'd say Steam is pushing for it harder. But that's just me.
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
rapidoud said:
Breaks every week, their sales tactics (they have you checking back daily during a sale, 75% off $90 is still more expensive than elsewhere), regional locking (only site I know of that does it and makes it a pain to get around; Amazon's is trivial), regional pricing ($90 for Dishonored when US is paying $60, what are you smoking?), games being tied to the service when I just want the bloody game, only very recently did they even bother fixing steam re-installs as I have to re-install it every month and having to redownload half my games is just an exercise in futility, not allowing Aussies to even buy their games during the last sale, all the f2p content that have ridiculous prices which people still pay.

They embody everything that has gone downhill in gaming since the early 2000s (although gaming has definitely gotten better as a whole) with the regional locking and shoving DRM down everyone's throats when the thing allows pirates to play with legitimate customers (yes that's right, pirates can use steam TO PLAY WITH YOU. Even EA aren't this inept).

The arrogance that is Steam Greenlight.

/rant
Wow, I am just fed up with them over the "Agree to any new TOS or lose all your games". How can anyone be comfortable with that? Since that happened last year, I just don't buy much from the anymore. As for the Daily Deals, I quit bothering even checking. It's always some indie game and I am not into indie games. It's like the Daily Deal is used to promote indie devs rather than giving customers a good deal on games we want.

I also think that the success of Steam is why publishers and console makers believe they can kill the used game market for consoles. They believe they can recreate the success of Steam on Live and PSN.
 

NinjaDeathSlap

Leaf on the wind
Feb 20, 2011
4,474
0
0
tautologico said:
Many indie developers have been praising Sony recently. It seems Sony is trying to become "the place to be" for indies on consoles, and it may pay off for them in the future.

And yes, although Sony's conference talked a lot about social features and connectivity, it was about social features and connectivity in the games, and not movies, ads and other media. Turn on an xbox360 nowadays and look at the dashboard, at first sight you wouldn't think it's a gaming console, because it tends to show movies or ads or other stuff at the front. Microsoft has been de-emphasizing gaming already on the 360, and this trend may continue with the nextbox.
Might just be me, but if that's the way the wind is blowing then I actually prefer Microsoft's way of doing things. Sure, I never use most of the capabilities that my 360 has these days, and if the Nextbox is going to be even more than that, it may be more than a little irksome to pay hundreds of pounds for a console who's price-tag is bloated by features I couldn't give a shit about. However, I can put up with that on two conditions...

1) The console can still play games (which it will)

2) All the other shit I don't care about won't interfere when I just want to play games.

Yes, the social features displayed on the PS4 were in relation to the games, rather than their own separate thing, and that was precisely what bothered me. It seemed to me not that the social features were a passive edition to your gaming experience, but rather it was the social features themselves that were the be all and end all, and that what games you are playing and how you were playing them was just another part of the social media experience, for the braying hordes of generation facebook to pass judgement on you for.

I don't care that my Xbox 360 dashboard seems to put my Netflix membership in far more prominence than what game I have in the disk drive, so long as when I select the game, the console lets me play the game and doesn't keep butting in to remind me how great it is that I can use Netflix on it. So long as Microsoft keeps it this way, me and Microsoft don't have a problem. But if Sony will only let me play games their way, and not my way, then me and Sony will have a problem.
 

Mr.Squishy

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,990
0
0
Newsflash, Mr. Blow. Nobody gives a flying toss about your pretentious, snobby, artsy ass.
'course, that isn't to to say M$ can't be stupid and draconian...
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,253
0
0
NinjaDeathSlap said:
So, the Playstation 4, which had about a third of it's launch event taken up by people talking about social media capability that has excited precisely nobody, is dedicated gaming device that Jo-Blow wants?

Either His Blowness is spewing crap (again), or Microsoft really is going to be even worse for that sort of thing than Sony is... which would certainly be an achievement.
No, it's not social media; it's social gaming. The PS4 is being prepped to provide a more social gaming experience. Built-in streaming/recording/screencaps, direct uploading of footage, that sort of thing. It may employ social media and its elements, but the PS4 is very much a game console above all else.

Seeing as the 360 is already trying to jack-of-all-trades it up as it is, the idea that Microsoft will push that even further with the next console is very probable, if not entirely expected.
 

tehroc

New member
Jul 6, 2009
1,293
0
0
I don't see what the point is with sticking with consoles. Based on the stats for the next gen consoles, they won't beat out the latest cell phone. My Nexus 4 is so much faster then my Xbox.

captcha: Skynet Watches
 

V da Mighty Taco

New member
Apr 9, 2011
890
0
0
tehroc said:
I don't see what the point is with sticking with consoles. Based on the stats for the next gen consoles, they won't beat out the latest cell phone. My Nexus 4 is so much faster then my Xbox.

captcha: Skynet Watches
0_0

Son of a *****... it's taken over Captcha! THE END IS NIGH!!


On Topic: I see his point, but to me it looks like both MS and Sony are going for the "does everything approach" to their systems. If he really wanted the most game-focused console, then he probably should've jumped on the Nintendo bandwagon. Still, I like hearing that Sony is focusing more on Indie devs this time around. I've only recently gotten into Super Meat Boy and wound up hearing about Team Meat's issues with MS for the first time the other day, so hearing that Indie devs are now getting better alternatives to MS sounds like a good thing to me.

Overall though, I still think the PC market is going to become much more dominant this next generation, especially when the new consoles are seeming more like PC / Smart TV hybrids that don't perform either task as well as an actual PC or Smart TV. Add the rise of digital retailers like Steam and GoG as well as the increasing popularity of Indie games (which are more common on PC) and things are looking promising for the PC market.
 

Scorpid

New member
Jul 24, 2011
814
0
0
I'm with Mr. Blow on this as a consumer. Between the red ring of death and the far inferior console pure processing wise, and now if blow is right and that they want the 720 or whatever they're going to call it to be a gaming device secondarily then I probably with make a PS4 my primary console. IF sony really wants to seal the deal with me they'll make make PS network completely free for multiplayer support. Paying ANY amount on top of the base 60 dollar price to play games online and then the ISP price to maintain that connection and then simply buying the PS4 $599 or whatever their release day price tag for the console will be, is absurd and has been for a more then a few years now. It only serves to make PC gaming look even more attractive even with the high price for entry of PC rigs.

((It also appeals to me because I've got no PS3 library to be backwards compatible with))
 

mysecondlife

New member
Feb 24, 2011
2,142
0
0
This is why I'm keeping an interest on new xbox announcement. Either it will intrigue me or it will be a train wreck.
 

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,147
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
thebobmaster said:
John Blow said:
"To me they talk about a console that is not strictly about games. It's trying to be a center of the living room device ... As a place to put the best, highest performing version of our game on, it doesn't seem as good a choice."
I don't know why, exactly, but this quote seems a little bit high-minded of Blow. I mean, he has no problem putting his games on PCs, he has no problem putting his new game on the PS4, which we know next to nothing about, but he draws the line at the Nextbox? He just seems to be coming off as a bit of a snob.
John Blow? High minded? Stop the presses.

I agree, it seems stupid to claim the PS4 is somehow more gaming-focusses than the Xbox, despite social media being one of it's main selling points.
To be fair the social focus is about sharing your gaming experience, I and many are skeptical at best, have no interest at worse, in the idea but it's focused on gaming as is the PS4 itself, compared to the xbox 360 and (reasonable to presume) the nextbox
 

nathan-dts

New member
Jun 18, 2008
1,538
0
0
Well pretty much every indie developer have voiced their issues in regards to Microsoft and downloadable games. Pretty much everyone unless you developed Minecraft.
 

ZZoMBiE13

Ate My Neighbors
Oct 10, 2007
1,908
0
0
I wouldn't walk across the street to play a "Blow game". I'm damn sure not going to pick a console based on his work (or his words).

I watched Indie Game: The Movie and it left me with one core feeling. "These guys are broken husks with no interpersonal skills and a very inflated sense of self". If he had problems working with Microsoft, I'd put as much of that on him as I would them.
 

Zeckt

New member
Nov 10, 2010
1,085
0
0
This is the guy who feels so intelligent for calling Mario mainstream and uncool right? meh! Anyways, I won't buy a microsoft product ever again as the 360 was just too unreliable. I prefer consoles that actually work.
 

Happiness Assassin

New member
Oct 11, 2012
773
0
0
Okay, this has come up again. Jim Sterling raised this point awhile back and I just want to know, what is wrong with a console being more than just a gaming device? I have seen the specter raised that having a console that is about more than games is a negative thing, but it has never been explained to me. Can someone care to elaborate?
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
TheRightToArmBears said:
thebobmaster said:
John Blow said:
"To me they talk about a console that is not strictly about games. It's trying to be a center of the living room device ... As a place to put the best, highest performing version of our game on, it doesn't seem as good a choice."
I don't know why, exactly, but this quote seems a little bit high-minded of Blow. I mean, he has no problem putting his games on PCs, he has no problem putting his new game on the PS4, which we know next to nothing about, but he draws the line at the Nextbox? He just seems to be coming off as a bit of a snob.
John Blow? High minded? Stop the presses.

I agree, it seems stupid to claim the PS4 is somehow more gaming-focusses than the Xbox, despite social media being one of it's main selling points.
Thats not quite why really, I mean we haven't seen the next Xbox yet so we don't know where it's focus lies. Whilst the PS4 has all the fancy social stuff going on that social stuff itself is gaming-focused social stuff about gaming and for games, it's also something you can totally ignore. I was interested by it all but not excited over it.

If Microsofts current plan of focusing on advertising on the dash and extraneous crap like netflix is anything to go by then we should be concerned over the next Xbox and what direction it will take, because that direction will help shape the market for the next half a decade or so. It's too early for anything but speculation but given Blow's whole indie dev thing it's possible microsft has introduced some unpleasant fees or something for independently published things or has some horrible exclusivity clause for them or something. Or it's possible that while Sony and Nintendo have both made moves to make things easier for indie devs, Microsoft has not and is thus less of a temptation.

I think we need to wait and see what Micrsoft throw out at us, but to get my interest it needs to be cheaper than or equal in price to the PS4. It also needs to make a Live subscription worth my money and not just a £40 shake down to play parts of games I already paid for and netflix (which I don't use and if I did I can has for free on PC or PS3 or whatever) and twitter (which i have on my phone for free...), and finally it needs to come up with a few new first party IP's or dig up some old ones from somewhere; Halo on it's own can't justify a hardware investment.

Edit: Oh and the nextbox needs to be reliable and not melt after 13 months of relatively casual use.

Also, I don't really like Mr Blow too much, find him pretentious and annoying. Mario is mainstream and uncool right? Cool story, we already knew that, thing is Mario games tend to be pretty fun and creative and Miyamoto's work has probably influenced a lot more people than Braid has.
 

The White Hunter

Basment Abomination
Oct 19, 2011
3,888
0
0
Scorpid said:
I'm with Mr. Blow on this as a consumer. Between the red ring of death and the far inferior console pure processing wise, and now if blow is right and that they want the 720 or whatever they're going to call it to be a gaming device secondarily then I probably with make a PS4 my primary console. IF sony really wants to seal the deal with me they'll make make PS network completely free for multiplayer support. Paying ANY amount on top of the base 60 dollar price to play games online and then the ISP price to maintain that connection and then simply buying the PS4 $599 or whatever their release day price tag for the console will be, is absurd and has been for a more then a few years now. It only serves to make PC gaming look even more attractive even with the high price for entry of PC rigs.

((It also appeals to me because I've got no PS3 library to be backwards compatible with))
PS network s free for online play, the Plus subscription just gets discounts and early access and stuff.

$599 again would be suicide, Sony CAN'T be that stupid.
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
OK, so even after Sony showed us all those ridiculous social features, Blow says that PS4 is more gaming oriented than the Nextbox? What the hell could Microsoft be doing with their next console? You know there is a very real chance that if Microsoft's console fails Microsoft will cease to exist. They are already in a lot of financial trouble.
 

GoaThief

Reinventing the Spiel
Feb 2, 2012
1,229
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
Blow says that PS4 is more gaming oriented than the Nextbox? What the hell could Microsoft be doing with their next console?
Or the more likely option? Nothing that different to the PS4, only that Blow is now batting for the other team and is paying them lip-service (no doubt aided by brown envelopes and copious amounts of blow).