burst fire in games

Recommended Videos

hiks89

New member
Oct 22, 2008
261
0
0
Does anyone like burst fire?. i dont get burst fire in fps, or any other shootemup games. is it made just to piss ppl off?
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
I don't use burst fire because I prefer to just control how long I fire for. I can squeeze off 3 shots in a row and then stop without being limited by my fire mode.
 

LikeDustInTheWind

New member
Mar 29, 2010
485
0
0
hiks89 said:
Does anyone like burst fire?. i dont get burst fire in fps, or any other shootemup games. is it made just to piss ppl off?
I'm pretty sure it's mainly for realism. Real guns are never used practically with continuous fire. I admit it is freaking annoying, though.
 

IBlackKiteI

New member
Mar 12, 2010
1,613
0
0
I wouldn't mind burst fire if it was actually done ok.

I once played this game where if you tap the trigger you fire one round, keep it held a little longer it fires two rounds, then if you hold it down it will fire three rounds then 'lock' itself until you pull the trigger again.
I'm not really sure, but I think thats how burst fire weapons work in reality.

However in games it usually sucks, the BR from Halo 2/3 and the M16 from MW1/2 are ridiculously idiot friendly with pinpoint accuracy at any distance with practically no spacing between the rounds, meaning the gun won't kick up at all while firing a burst.

So yeah, burst fire modes would be nice if done correctly.
 

Valknott

New member
Mar 9, 2011
62
0
0
I don't mind it as long as it's on a gun that has burst fire in the real world. Otherwise it annoys me to no end.
 
Sep 13, 2009
635
0
0
If it's strictly burst not really. I naturally fire in bursts in most situations, but I like being able to bullet-hose a room when the situation calls for it.
 

Ladette

New member
Feb 4, 2011
983
0
0
Usually no, although....
I am a beast in CS:Source with the Clarion and burst fire, the thing is a head shot machine.
 

dragonhunter21

New member
Feb 6, 2011
57
0
0
I don't think any rifle currently in use with a modern military is automatic.

Even if they were, full-auto is absolute crap when it comes to accuracy. You'd end up firing it in bursts anyway. Personally, I like it- it helps keep a cap on my fire-rate, which in turn helps conserve ammo. And you can't tell me you can't spam that button fast enough to make the difference moot.
 

Hisshiss

New member
Aug 10, 2010
689
0
0
When it comes to gun stats, burst fire is usually a handicap of sorts designed to allow a gun really high accuracy without sacraficing clip capacity or damage output or any of the other things typical "accurate" guns lose. The M16 in call of duty games being a great example, that gun hits like a truck but has near flawless accuracy, and aside from a somewhat slow fire rate, its lack of full auto allowed for much higher total stats.

So yeah, burst fire is rarely a boon, its usually a tradeoff to create a very well rounded gun.

As far as if I like it..no. If for no other reason than I have this bad tendency to fire and miss the target by like a frikkin half inch, causing me to get owned before it lets me fire again.

While full auto lets me sort of sweep if I miss the initial few shots.


Edit: and yeah, the guy above me has a point, ammo is scarce in real military situations, so full auto is used primarily for supression, most guns are semi-auto.
 

bl4ckh4wk64

Walking Mass Effect Codex
Jun 11, 2010
1,277
0
0
dragonhunter21 said:
I don't think any rifle currently in use with a modern military is automatic.

Even if they were, full-auto is absolute crap when it comes to accuracy. You'd end up firing it in bursts anyway. Personally, I like it- it helps keep a cap on my fire-rate, which in turn helps conserve ammo. And you can't tell me you can't spam that button fast enough to make the difference moot.
Eh, the U.S. Navy still uses the M16A3, which is semi and rock-n-roll. Then there's the British forces that use the L85A2, same situation. There's the German forces that use any H&K gun, also semi/auto. Russians use the Ak74, auto/semi. African militaries (if you can call them that) use the ak47 or the ak74. I think Australia uses the Steyr AUG, which is almost completely auto (the semi function is operated by a half pull on the trigger). There's actually only a few that really use a semi/burst fire rifle. The most prominent being the U.S. Marines, and even then their officers are given a choice between the M16A4 and the M4A1, the M4A1 being a semi/auto gun.
 

The Wykydtron

"Emotions are very important!"
Sep 23, 2010
5,458
0
0
I prefer being medium to long range anyway so i tend to burst fire if i'm not sniping

Not that real long range is even remotely possible in any game that's not in the Battlefield series (i think...)

Captcha oureally... YA RLY!
 

chromewarriorXIII

The One with the Cake
Oct 17, 2008
2,448
0
0
I don't mind it if it's optional. For example, I've been playing Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 and I like how you can change the firing modes of some guns from single, to burst, to auto. It makes it so that just about any gun is good for any situation. I can go from a big battle in fully auto to single fire and pick off enemies with headshots.
 
Nov 12, 2010
1,167
0
0
If it can be done as an option to a weapon rather then a forced attachment and then have it as a balanced alternative then yes,it is amazing
 

Eldarion

New member
Sep 30, 2009
1,887
0
0
I use assault rifles in most games with a sniper primary. I generally only fire in burst shots anyway. Full auto fire is for spraying bullets like an idiot. :p
 

Wraith_V

New member
Nov 20, 2010
8
0
0
Burst fire was introduced because the army determined that whoever had the most firepower in a firefight generally won. Full auto weapons went through bullets too quickly, meaning that soldiers would have to carry excessive amounts of ammo so they created a burst fire. Burst fire was supposed to increase the firepower of squads but keep ammo consumption down, although I've seen many posts from soldiers on the Bohemia interactive forums indicating that they almost always use semi-auto fire leaving the full auto stuff to their squad machinegunner.

I personally dislike burst fire, it wastes ammo at long distances and sucks at close range.
 

Dirty Hipsters

This is how we praise the sun!
Legacy
Feb 7, 2011
8,802
3,383
118
Country
'Merica
Gender
3 children in a trench coat
I love burst fire, it helps me conserve ammo (quite the necessity for those nice big killstreaks).