California Gay Marriage Ban Lifted

Recommended Videos

evilartist

New member
Nov 9, 2009
471
0
0
warboss5 said:
MrFluffy-X said:
warboss5 said:
Furious Styles said:
MrFluffy-X said:
I believe gay marriage is wrong, that is just my opinion, Its just sounds like an oxymoron to me
Fair enough, care to elaborate?
(insert Akbar "It's a trap!" pic here)

hehe, sorry, couldn't help myself =P
HAHA i dont doubt that its a trap.

Well marriage has always been when two people 'come together' under the responsibilities of a religion, and we know that religions tend to reject homosexuality.

So why call it 'marriage' which has always been religious.
Actually, historically, marriage is a political and financial matter. It was only relatively recently that marriage became primarily about sanctifying the union before some higher power.
Actually, I can back warboss up on that. Marriage has been just a legal/political practice since ancient Rome. As a matter of fact, it was very common for husbands to have male lovers, even when married to women. Hell, an entire theme in Roman art was born out of an emperor's passion for his (deceased) partner. The Christ-bigots can take a lesson from going to school and learning that the world is much older, more massive, and ethically diverse than their confined little views.
 

ReincarnatedFTP

New member
Jun 13, 2009
779
0
0
And I'm done with this thread, I won't be responding to any more quotes of me, because issues like this can go on forever and I don't feel like coming back to this thread to respond to a quote ad infitinum.
I'll just debate/agree with you guys the next time a gay marriage thread comes up.
Baiguyz
 

SkullCap

New member
Nov 10, 2009
814
0
0
Wrds said:
Calling the opinion of supporting gay marriage enlightened is presumptuous, still, I'm happy knowing there are some happy couples out there now.
Thank you. The world "enlightened" is getting thrown around that people with differing opinions on the subject are just deemed "ignorant."
 

Baby Eater

Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!
Aug 27, 2009
24,173
0
0
I only have 2 words for anti-gays.

[HEADING=1]Freddy. Mercury.[/HEADING]

OT:My gay best friend squeed from this news. I would too but apparently straight men can't..

>_>
<_<

SQUEE!
 

Dexiro

New member
Dec 23, 2009
2,977
0
0
HyenaThePirate said:
Dexiro said:
I'm not arguing against your opinion, i just think you're being a little harsh xD

Be honest, have you ever met a gay person? The majority are no different than anyone else.
You know your best friend, anyone you work with, the average passerby in the street, they could be gay without giving the slightest hint. It just seems a bit harsh that you'd suddenly distance yourself once you found out about a tiny harmless fact.

Imagine if your best friend suddenly cut off all communications with you just because you liked apples, it wouldn't be nice D:
I wouldn't like it, but wouldn't I have to accept it? I certainly wouldn't want to be forced to suddenly eating apples just to appease him. So its his perogative. He can cut communications and I'll go on disliking apples, which is one solution that resolves the situation. It is probably the most peaceful of solutions as well, because the alternative would be to either force me to like apples, or force him to be my friend, and forcing anybody to do anything they don't like isn't right no matter what side you find yourself on.
I'm not sure you read my post properly, one of us is getting confused here xD

The point is you wouldn't be forced to do anything by associating with gay people.

Lets say you distanced yourself from anyone that liked apples. Now a great friend of yours reveals that he likes apples. His liking apples isn't actually affecting you at all though so is it really a good enough reason to distance yourself from him? He's essentially the same person he was before you found out about his apple love afterall!

Now if you're distancing yourself from the flamboyant "unicorns and rainbows" type of gay person then i totally understand you finding it uncomfortable, I'm gay and even i avoid the annoying flamboyant type.
For most gay people though their sexuality is no different for someone's love of apples. I'd just hate to see you or anyone else lose a friend over something so small.
 

KEM10

New member
Oct 22, 2008
725
0
0
HyenaThePirate said:
As far as the complete and total bigot comment
I took that comment from you when you were talking about America's only true right (a statement I agree with). It was a negative label, and I thought an exaggeration of such, where you might find a chuckle in the creative cropping to get a point across.

For your thought experiment, I don't see much changing in the way of life for California. The biggots and the fags (I used both negative terms in attempts to draw equality this time) generally don't go into each other's territory. I believe one of the major reasons for all of this anti-gay sentiment was that you couldn't just pick them out of a crowd like a normal minority. The Black/Woman/Jewish/Hispanic populations stick out like a sore thumb, so you can easily make the us v. them arguments. However, anyone can be gay so it brings more of an espionage element to the table.

If you want to cite history, you need to look at the McCarthy era. Anyone could be a communist supporter, so a witch hunt ensued. The movement gained a lot of momentum and then died when McCarthy was found to be a complete and total twat (read fingered prominent military figures who did more for the country in an afternoon than he did his entire life). We just have to wait for some huge scandal of a super Republican (or Tea Party member) or high ranking religious official that turns out to be gay. I vote for the pope, no straight man would wear that flamboyant a dress with matching accessories.
 

Scde2

Has gone too far in a few places
Mar 25, 2010
33,805
0
0
Alright! This truly made my day.

As someone who is gay and lives in California, I am really really happy with this ruling.

But yes, there is still the Appeals Court (Which I think is the 9th Circuit, which may be the most liberal) and then the Supreme Court, and who knows what can happen from there.

But sadly for many people, there's still going to be a long and ugly battle over same-sex marriage.
 

HyenaThePirate

New member
Jan 8, 2009
1,412
0
0
Dexiro said:
HyenaThePirate said:
Dexiro said:
I'm not arguing against your opinion, i just think you're being a little harsh xD

Be honest, have you ever met a gay person? The majority are no different than anyone else.
You know your best friend, anyone you work with, the average passerby in the street, they could be gay without giving the slightest hint. It just seems a bit harsh that you'd suddenly distance yourself once you found out about a tiny harmless fact.

Imagine if your best friend suddenly cut off all communications with you just because you liked apples, it wouldn't be nice D:
I wouldn't like it, but wouldn't I have to accept it? I certainly wouldn't want to be forced to suddenly eating apples just to appease him. So its his perogative. He can cut communications and I'll go on disliking apples, which is one solution that resolves the situation. It is probably the most peaceful of solutions as well, because the alternative would be to either force me to like apples, or force him to be my friend, and forcing anybody to do anything they don't like isn't right no matter what side you find yourself on.
I'm not sure you read my post properly, one of us is getting confused here xD

The point is you wouldn't be forced to do anything by associating with gay people.

Lets say you distanced yourself from anyone that liked apples. Now a great friend of yours reveals that he likes apples. His liking apples isn't actually affecting you at all though so is it really a good enough reason to distance yourself from him? He's essentially the same person he was before you found out about his apple love afterall!

If you're distancing yourself from flamboyant "unicorns and rainbows" type of gay person then i totally understand you finding it uncomfortable, I'm gay and even i avoid the annoying flamboyant type.
For most gay people though their sexuality is no different for someone's love of apples. I'd just hate to see you or anyone else lose a friend over something so small.
Oh I got your point. And it made very good sense. But, as I said, it comes down to a person's personal convictions. If I made it a private policy to distance myself from anyone who liked apples, and a friend of mine reveals that he likes apples, what impetus would I have to suddenly reverse that policy I have lived by for so long? At that point, the question would be if the particular FRIEND is worth enough to overlook his apple love affair. Some people don't have the capacity to do that. I certainly don't in some aspects.

For example, I believe in God. If I had a friend that did not believe in God, in fact revealed that he was a very staunch atheist, then would not my decision to remain friends with him be based upon my consideration of his worth to me as well as his consideration of my worth to him? His actions would carry a considerable amount of weight, for example, if he began to constantly thumb his nose at religion or make statements that would be considered insulting or had a very "anti-religion" behavior, even if he treated me like his only dear kid brother I'd have deep reservations about associating with such a person. But if I ever said "I'll have to pray about about that" and he was supportive in my beliefs or in the least refrained from making a statement about the futility of prayer or what have you, then perhaps the friendship could be salvaged in some capacity.

I think thats where this gay issue lies currently. If gays kept their personal business and thoughts to themselves and anti-gays did the same, there would be no issue. If they got married or civil unioned or whatever and it was just something between their partners and themselves then fine. But if they expect everyone to be joyed about it and celebrate their marriage as if they were a heterosexual couple, they may run into a problem... that is asking a lot of people, especially over a subject that is uncomfortable at best to some and absolutely reviled at worst by others.

But there is another side of this... the "friend's" side. What right does my "Friend" who loves apples have to demand that I know, accept, and understand his apple love affair? If they know my feelings on apples, why would he need to even bring up his love of apples to me? Why not keep it personal? I don't need to know the details of him eating apples, nor is there a need to share them so that creates a problem on the other end of the spectrum.

I think that might be another possible key to why this whole gay marriage thing is an issue to begin with... because while some may view it as a private, personal thing that they have the right to do, there is that flamboyant element that even YOU admit you dislike that feel the need to draw attention to themselves as if who they are sleeping with, how, and why is important to anyone other than themselves. If you like same sex sex, then go right ahead, go down a storm, and do whatever tickles your fancy. But don't expect in fact don't INSIST that others like it too or must be tolerant when you flaunt it to them.

People need to learn how to behave in a society again... I think we've all embraced this idea of "anarchy" where you and YOUR beliefs and feelings are supposed to matter to people and should be shouted out publically at every opportunity. This just isn't so.

Besides, maybe if gay people found me cuter than the girls that reject me, I might be more receptive to them. Just a little humor :) to lighten a heavy block of rhetoric.
 

Baby Eater

Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!
Aug 27, 2009
24,173
0
0
Konrad Curze said:
Baby Eater said:
I only have 2 words for anti-gays.

[HEADING=1]Freddy. Mercury.[/HEADING]
Isn't that more a vote in favour of anti gay seeing as having unprotected gay sex is what caused his death...
That's like being anti-any group because they gave someone syphilis.

I was merely saying that gay people do incredible things (I.E Bohemian Rhapsody)

If that was just a joke you got me friend.
 

Oilerfan92

New member
Mar 5, 2010
483
0
0
Baby Eater said:
I only have 2 words for anti-gays.

[HEADING=1]Freddy. Mercury.[/HEADING]

OT:My gay best friend squeed from this news. I would too but apparently straight men can't..

>_>
<_<

SQUEE!
Checkmate. If Freddy Mercury isn't enough proof that gays can offer things to society they you truly are bigots
 

PhunkyPhazon

New member
Dec 23, 2009
1,967
0
0
That's good to hear.

Though slightly off topic, I heard my parents talking about this earlier. I didn't really hear enough to know what happened, but they were acting like this was a terrible thing. Ugh, I am NOT looking forward to the day when I have to come clean with them on my political views. Yet at the same time, I actually kind of AM looking forward to it, if that makes sense.
 

HyenaThePirate

New member
Jan 8, 2009
1,412
0
0
KEM10 said:
HyenaThePirate said:
As far as the complete and total bigot comment
I took that comment from you when you were talking about America's only true right (a statement I agree with). It was a negative label, and I thought an exaggeration of such, where you might find a chuckle in the creative cropping to get a point across.

For your thought experiment, I don't see much changing in the way of life for California. The biggots and the fags (I used both negative terms in attempts to draw equality this time) generally don't go into each other's territory. I believe one of the major reasons for all of this anti-gay sentiment was that you couldn't just pick them out of a crowd like a normal minority. The Black/Woman/Jewish/Hispanic populations stick out like a sore thumb, so you can easily make the us v. them arguments. However, anyone can be gay so it brings more of an espionage element to the table.

If you want to cite history, you need to look at the McCarthy era. Anyone could be a communist supporter, so a witch hunt ensued. The movement gained a lot of momentum and then died when McCarthy was found to be a complete and total twat (read fingered prominent military figures who did more for the country in an afternoon than he did his entire life). We just have to wait for some huge scandal of a super Republican (or Tea Party member) or high ranking religious official that turns out to be gay. I vote for the pope, no straight man would wear that flamboyant a dress with matching accessories.
You might be on to something there..
People fear nothing more than something they can't SEE. It makes them feel threatened at all times.. I wonder how many people have learned that a close friend is "gay" and then suddenly find themselves worried sick about all the times they've been "alone in that perverts" presence while asleep, or how often that person checked out their knob and tackle?
Such ridiculous concerns might seem novel and silly to us, but to the right kind of person, it can be a recipe for disaster.
 

Baby Eater

Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!
Aug 27, 2009
24,173
0
0
whiston532 said:
Baby Eater said:
I only have 2 words for anti-gays.

[HEADING=1]Freddy. Mercury.[/HEADING]

OT:My gay best friend squeed from this news. I would too but apparently straight men can't..

>_>
<_<

SQUEE!
Checkmate. If Freddy Mercury isn't enough proof that gays can offer things to society they you truly are bigots
Whether or not you're being sarcastic doesn't bug me. I just use Freddy Mercury in every gay conversation.
 

Broken Blade

New member
Nov 29, 2007
348
0
0
PhunkyPhazon said:
That's good to hear.

Though slightly off topic, I heard my parents talking about this earlier. I didn't really hear enough to know what happened, but they were acting like this was a terrible thing. Ugh, I am NOT looking forward to the day when I have to come clean with them on my political views. Yet at the same time, I actually kind of AM looking forward to it, if that makes sense.
I certainly wish you luck when that time comes, though it's best that you have backup plans in case it doesn't go well. :\ Though the shocked expressions on their faces may be what you're looking forward to, that despite raising you you came to form your own opinions on matters.

As for me, I really never saw any reason for homosexual couples to not be allowed to marry in the first place, and my family pretty much believes the same thing. I don't like that something like this had to happen, but sometimes drastic measures have to happen in order for positive change to happen. I also harbor no illusions that this battle is over, but it's a nice bit of good news.
 

Baby Eater

Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!
Aug 27, 2009
24,173
0
0
PhunkyPhazon said:
That's good to hear.

Though slightly off topic, I heard my parents talking about this earlier. I didn't really hear enough to know what happened, but they were acting like this was a terrible thing. Ugh, I am NOT looking forward to the day when I have to come clean with them on my political views. Yet at the same time, I actually kind of AM looking forward to it, if that makes sense.
They're your parents. They'll understand! If not,you can yell at me all ya want :p