Call of Duty 5

Recommended Videos

Darmort

New member
Mar 16, 2009
230
0
0
Call of Duty 5, or World at War if you want to be really picky about such things, is just another Call of Duty World War II shooter where you play a cross between a Russian and an American. Eventually, as the Russian, only you will raise the flag above the Reichstag, and as the Americans there's something slightly different; you're killing the Japanese.

For the most part, I really don't like Call of Duty 5. Compared to Call of Duty 4, 5 just feels wrong. It's very pretty and well polished in the graphics department, and the audio is fantastic, but there's something missing about the gameplay. Weapons just don't have the feel that they did in 4, and most of them aren't even worth using without the time to aim. That is to say, a bolt action rifle. Yes, I know that historically there were many more rifles than there were machine guns, but the weapons take two or three bullets to kill an enemy with, and with a five shot clip after you've gone through two enemies you're reloading.

I'm also going to complain about the amount of grenades the Japanese threw at me, even on Regular (on Veteran that's just masochism).

The best things about Call of Duty 5 is the first Russian mission and a minority of the weapons, such as the Browning Automatic Rifle or the Gewehr 43, but otherwise, there's nothing about the gameplay that I like.

The multiplayer is full of people either using sniper rifles or machine guns running around. It's easier to get kill streaks on certain maps, and I've found that once one side gets ahead, they stay ahead regardless of what happens.

There's just too many things that let Call of Duty 5 down compared to the few good things about it.

Also, Nazi Zombies just isn't Left 4 Dead or Killing Floor. I got bored of it after soloing up to round 15 then I put the controller down and walked away, because it basically consisted of me shooting Zombies in the head with the Gewehr or the BAR, and failing that I fall back to the biggest rapidfiring gun I had my hands on...

I've tried it, and I've tried to like it, but I guess I'm tired of World War II shooters and something as small as a minigame shouldn't be considered enough to say that an entire game is good, especially when the multiplayer is drowned with snipers and sprayers that turns it into a game of more modded-controllers wins, and especially when the whole thing is just repetition without any progress or seeming end to it. The difficulty doesn't really increase either, it just enhances the numer of zombies it throws at you and hopes you'll die, and there's nothing that pins you down or otherwise incapitates you for the need for teammates, other than being knocked over when a Zombie hits you about twice.

In my opinion, I'd stay clear of it, but who knows, maybe World War II is what people like because Nazis were bad... wait, didn't the Americans drop nuclear warheads...? Call of Duty 5 isn't new, it isn't especially unique, but it would actually score points if you played as, say, a German or Japanese soldier... for once...
 

12345cyclone

New member
May 31, 2009
125
0
0
Great review. It's nice for someone to say for once that although nazi zombies is interesting, it doesn't justify the purchase of a full game.
 

L3m0n_L1m3

New member
Jul 27, 2009
3,049
0
0
12345cyclone said:
Great review. It's nice for someone to say for once that although nazi zombies is interesting, it doesn't justify the purchase of a full game.
Agreed. Now, if they were to make an exclusive Nazi Zombies game....
 

Robert632

New member
May 11, 2009
3,870
0
0
12345cyclone said:
Great review. It's nice for someone to say for once that although nazi zombies is interesting, it doesn't justify the purchase of a full game.
that's espeically true considering you have to download a second level. and play though the whole campaign just to play it.
 

toastmaster2k8

New member
Jul 21, 2008
451
0
0
FINALLY. somebody says that its A not so good. I got sick of listening to people talk about it all dame day that its good. they didnt evan talk about the main game, just nazi zombies and how they sat in the corner for two hours.
 

suhlEap

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,044
0
0
i dunno if i'd agree on the whole. i thought it was a pretty fun game (aside from nazi zombies). i actually thought the zombie thing got old pretty quickly but i still find it a solid game.
 

pieeater911

New member
Jun 27, 2008
577
0
0
Good review.
Call of Duty 5 just felt like a shitty expansion pack to Call of Duty 4 rather than a full priced game. The only interesting part was the Nazi zombies mini-game, and that got old with an hour or so. A rental game at best.
 

The Kangaroo

New member
Feb 24, 2009
1,481
0
0
Darmort said:
I'm also going to complain about the amount of grenades the Japanese threw at me, even on Regular (on Veteran that's just masochism).
Good Review but is it not sadism on their part? rather than masochism?
 

Darmort

New member
Mar 16, 2009
230
0
0
Sadism is if you were handing out grenade sammiches, whereas the masochism is taking the many, many grenade sarnies the Japanese give you, thus you've got to have some wierd kind of gaming masochism to play the game on Veteran.
 

JoshGod

New member
Aug 31, 2009
1,472
0
0
i agree the game is nowere near as good as 4 i only went to 5 since der riese got such a buzz and yes i loved it but now im sick of it and im back to 4 with most of my m8s.

yes i think they should make a nazi zombie game because ps3 owners have no zombie games and i think it would be good (although ill rather just have left 4 dead but o well)(actually we do have dead nation and zombie apocolypse coming which are 2 downloadable games and dont menchen burnzombeburn im not interested)

another thing i recently realised is that there is no point to need to get to a higher level after type 100 as the last sub is really crap, all assaults are crap/the same and the browning is just a type 99 with a bigger clip and longer reload.(and the ptrs isnt as fun for me as the first one even though it needs stoping power)

anyway did you know cod 3 & 5 are made by treyarch and 4 was made by infinity ward so erm wana burn down treyarch anyone?? atleast slap them a little?

p.s. go to ign and watch the new multiplayer video 'flag runner' its awsome ull watch it again and again lol.
 

Mcface

New member
Aug 30, 2009
2,266
0
0
I thought WaW was fine.
Its a good polished game, that is worth the money.

and dont say 4's multiplayer is any different.

It's either sniper, M4, or P90.
 

zirnitra

New member
Jun 2, 2008
605
0
0
Yes they did drop nukes...you watch them in the archive footage at the end of the game. you complained because the guns require you too aim...?

but on the whole the game isen't brilliant. it's probably the best WWII shooter but it's far too done. I have a feeling that in the near future when people look historically at all the games of this time most of them will be WWII shooters. like looking at all the films in the 40s/50s that were about WWII or westerns. the only thing that made this one better than the rest was the grittiness of it
 

BigT65

New member
Jul 1, 2009
70
0
0
Mcface said:
I thought WaW was fine.
Its a good polished game, that is worth the money.

and dont say 4's multiplayer is any different.

It's either sniper, M4, or P90.
Actually, now it's turned into sniper, MP5, or the M16;
that's why I only play hardcore because it's more realistic and it's not just idiots running around.