Sorry, that's definitely not good logic.Tankichi said:I remember someone telling me that Casual Gamers is someone who plays Wii and does play for any competition. I now understand that casual gamers are people who just jump into games with little to no story line. Or play games that have no focus on it at all. Now if they buy it for the storyline and barely play the Multi Player then thats another story but most buy it for multi player. Of course everything i say can be taken with a salt lick because i also believe hardcore gamers are the guys who yell at their T.V and freak out when their KDR falls below 10 lol.
Rewold said:I must be a weird person because I can't get enough of WWII. Modern era wargames just seem kinda meh to me...SelectivelyEvil13 said:My guess is an upswing in masochism. Apparently a large consumer base has a high demand for being called a colorful slur by a small child through a plastic mic.SL33TBL1ND said:Wait what? But it's the same bloody game! Why are these people buying it!
Joking aside, could World at War have suffered from being another WWII game? That in itself provided me with ample reason to avoid it like it was carrying a disease.
You're not weird, it's just the ludicrous saturation of poorly made WWII games. No matter the number of gems, they were always overshadowed by the neglected pile of rubbish.Rewold said:I must be a weird person because I can't get enough of WWII. Modern era wargames just seem kinda meh to me...SelectivelyEvil13 said:My guess is an upswing in masochism. Apparently a large consumer base has a high demand for being called a colorful slur by a small child through a plastic mic.SL33TBL1ND said:Wait what? But it's the same bloody game! Why are these people buying it!
Joking aside, could World at War have suffered from being another WWII game? That in itself provided me with ample reason to avoid it like it was carrying a disease.
Wow, I'm getting a lot of quotes from this post. Anyway, why!? The multiplayer is the same! The only difference ever is maybe a new game mode, slightly different perks and different kill-streaks which generally do the same thing regardless!Dr. Manhattan said:Simple. Multiplayer. That's the main damn reason I bought it in the first place. Just happened to turn out that the campaigne was alright too.SL33TBL1ND said:Wait what? But it's the same bloody game! Why are these people buying it!
New maps, hopefully better ones, and probably some improvements. But I do see your point. I just want new better maps.SL33TBL1ND said:Wow, I'm getting a lot of quotes from this post. Anyway, why!? The multiplayer is the same! The only difference ever is maybe a new game mode, slightly different perks and different kill-streaks which generally do the same thing regardless!Dr. Manhattan said:Simple. Multiplayer. That's the main damn reason I bought it in the first place. Just happened to turn out that the campaigne was alright too.SL33TBL1ND said:Wait what? But it's the same bloody game! Why are these people buying it!
probably for the same reason you bought Halo: Reach. which has changed even less throughout it's life than CoD has.DannibalG36 said:So, WHY ON EARTH are people buying YET ANOTHER Call of Duty? It's been virtually the same game for the past three iterations. A good game, but basically the same.
Well, we will get to see just how big the herd is this year.SL33TBL1ND said:Wait what? But it's the same bloody game! Why are these people buying it!
I'm with you there, that'll teach them for justifying the ridoncu-prices of day 1 games.Atmos Duality said:Well, we will get to see just how big the herd is this year.SL33TBL1ND said:Wait what? But it's the same bloody game! Why are these people buying it!
The witless sheep will buy anything if it has a reknowned brand stamped on it.
Heh. Branding.
Perhaps we should brand the Activision logo onto the hide of every person who bought CoD4, MW2, and Black Ops on day one. I'm sure they'd love it.