So, i recently finished Black Ops like many of you, and looking back on it, something hit me. why does Black ops have the exact, same premise as Battlefield Bad Company 2? Don't know what i mean? then check this out?
That intentionally ambiguous prompt basically describes the premise of both Bad Company 2 and Black Ops, Word-for-Word!
Note that I'm not crying foul play or anything. I assume that this is a coincidence, but imo, it's also a right shame. why? because i want Black Ops to be able to claim that it has an intelligent, original story.
It sure as hell does a better job of 'telling' the same story than BC2 did, since the latter was just one BIG awkward laugh, constantly poking you in the ribs and saying "We're Funny! Just stop shooting back at that tank (that's about to blow you up) for ONE minute and listen to this joke that you're friend is saying in the MIDDLE OF A F*&@ING WAR!"
I especially liked the well orchestrated, if a little predictable, plot twist near the end of Blops:
But anyway, do you guys think that this coincidence just shows how stagnant the modern military shooter genre has become in, what, 4 short years.
During the last stages of World War 2, a platoon of Allied Soldiers are sent to extract an Axis scientist essential to the development of an experimental Axis Superweapon, but fail (in some way) resulting in the weapon falling into the hands of an evil Russian General Bloke, who in the present time, plans to deploy said super Weapon upon the continental United states as a first strike measure to be followed by a full scale Russian invasion. So now a group of 'immortal-until-the-plot-demands-otherwise' soldiers must go figure out his plot, stop the countdown at exactly the last second and then kill the bad guy in the most dramatic and action movie-esque method available to them.
That intentionally ambiguous prompt basically describes the premise of both Bad Company 2 and Black Ops, Word-for-Word!
Note that I'm not crying foul play or anything. I assume that this is a coincidence, but imo, it's also a right shame. why? because i want Black Ops to be able to claim that it has an intelligent, original story.
It sure as hell does a better job of 'telling' the same story than BC2 did, since the latter was just one BIG awkward laugh, constantly poking you in the ribs and saying "We're Funny! Just stop shooting back at that tank (that's about to blow you up) for ONE minute and listen to this joke that you're friend is saying in the MIDDLE OF A F*&@ING WAR!"
I especially liked the well orchestrated, if a little predictable, plot twist near the end of Blops:
"Reznov...isn't really there!" "Yeah, i know that from the fact that no one ONCE stopped to ask, why this random Russian dude is following us around, or ....you know... saying "Hi there! who the hell are you, exactly?"
But anyway, do you guys think that this coincidence just shows how stagnant the modern military shooter genre has become in, what, 4 short years.