freakonnaisance said:
I find COD5 very nice. It expands into campaigns that I have NOT played before and is quite unique even against its oh so tempting to use as a game WWII background. Multiplayer is phenomenal including nazi zombies and I cannot stand those who keep complaining about it.Yes, we know the guns suck, no we dont care. COD4 was just another modern shooter just like the free ones i can dwnload on the internet or get for like what, 20 bucks? SO STOP TELLING ME YOU DON'T LIKE COD5... you just suck.
Wow, your reasoning is so blindingly perfect we all must obey you. Its not that the guns suck, its that they are horribly imbalanced. The STG 44, MP 40, Thompson and the PPsh are all horrendously overpowered and break the game's multiplayer. That, coupled with the tanks that take over 5 Rockets/5 Satchel Charges/5 Grenade Launcher shots/5 Tank Grenades to kill proceed to make the game nothing but a horrible pile of excrement. CoD 4 had balanced weapons, amazing maps, and had more than a shred of originality to it regarding the campaign.
CoD 5 utilities the same engine as CoD 4, blatantly rips off content from its predecessor and other sources, has a horrible campaign (especially on Veteran) and comes packed with a broken multiplayer. Oh look, Zombies - I guess everything is alright now.
On topic, the review was a wall of text, needs pictures, but you did cover the subject matter effectively and thoroughly. Keep it up.