Call of Duty: World at War
- Thread starter chieftain mike
- Start date
Recommended Videos
bloody dogs, I had to empty a clip into one to kill it in single player. Only thing I can hope for is if the dogs stay and munch on a fallen soldier for a little while first so then I have an excuse to throw hand grenades at team-meats... I mean mates.
Also dogs should have a chance of accidently attacking your own team, as dogs arn't all that smart and would gladly munch on the nearest person, especially if they're not being shot it by him.
Also dogs should have a chance of accidently attacking your own team, as dogs arn't all that smart and would gladly munch on the nearest person, especially if they're not being shot it by him.
I don't why you are all complaining about WW II. The "modern warfare" you all crave is so boring! What do you do? Kill Arabs and russians. Like thats much better then Murdering nazis? maybe more fictionalized conflicts are needed America VS. britain and the U.N. perhaps? Because thats what games are; FICTION!
Company of Heroes did that. The Opposing Fronts expansion featured a campaign for the axis during Market Garden. The Germans in the game even comment that they aren't fighting for any "glorious empire", they are fighting for each other. Company of Heroes is pretty popular, and I don't remember any kind of uproar about leading Germans against British and Americans.chieftain mike post=9.73003.826409 said:
Really? I've heard of Company of Heroes, but that's an RTS, right? I suppose I'm a bit sore from the media's treatment of video games (on top of the Australian government's treatment, in regards to censorship), but I don't think my claims are unfounded. I suppose that, because it's an RTS, it's not as bad as if it were an FPS. Forgive me for not playing the game, but is it a FP POV, or a camera looking down? If it's the former, then someone could go "Video games are teaching my children to murder Americans!!"...ShyWinter post=9.73003.842317 said:
Though, I suppose you have a point that immediately playing from the Axis doesn't mean they will get jumped on. Hopefully, some WW2 shooter ends up doing this.
i personally think that every type of shooter has been overdone, there are generally 3 types of shooters ww2, modern and futuristic.
we are now basically stuck with remakes of those three types...unless they do like a 1600 century shooter with muskets and stuff but that would probably be a failure....no wait.....i am thinkin about it and it might actually be cool! it would be sorta like sniping cuz of the one shot reload factor but sorta like at a closer range with melee mixed in (like bayonets) and then maybe and then like you could mix in squad gameplay bcuz have 2 command your battalion to move to the right position and use the right tactics and u also have to follow the generals orders
omg this might actually be some good! plz give me feed back
or u could just do something like LordCraigus and get 2 play as the nazis!! mother fucker that would be cool!
we are now basically stuck with remakes of those three types...unless they do like a 1600 century shooter with muskets and stuff but that would probably be a failure....no wait.....i am thinkin about it and it might actually be cool! it would be sorta like sniping cuz of the one shot reload factor but sorta like at a closer range with melee mixed in (like bayonets) and then maybe and then like you could mix in squad gameplay bcuz have 2 command your battalion to move to the right position and use the right tactics and u also have to follow the generals orders
omg this might actually be some good! plz give me feed back
or u could just do something like LordCraigus and get 2 play as the nazis!! mother fucker that would be cool!
i am a hardcore call of duty 4 fan and i think making one set in the pacific is about the last thing the developers shoukd do, although i am excited for COD6 because that is another modern warfare one !!!!