Calm Down About "Duke Nukem Forever"

Recommended Videos

TexDangerfield

New member
Jun 11, 2011
13
0
0
It's hilarious the pathetic lengths some people are going to defend Gearbox, it doesn't matter, there name is on the gamebox, it's there fault, and yeah, I couldn't really care for the game either way, just stop with the ''ITS 3D relmz fault!!1'' crap.
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,365
3
43
kayisking said:
We know this because Gearbox said it themselves. 3d realms version didn't have a weapon limit, it didn't have regenrative health, and it didn't have puzzles. Gearbox said something about bringing Duke up to modern standard. IT'S THEIR FAULT!!!
I saw someone link this video once to show that DNF had the ability to carry many weapons at least until 2008. You can see them changing weapons at the 4:26 mark. The other developer (forgot their name) could have still changed it between then and them going belly (which I believe happened one year later), though.

 

JoJo Bizzaro 7

New member
Mar 7, 2010
258
0
0
The ignorance here is mind numbing...
Gearbox is not known for half-assing projects. They did there best. All your doing is making baseless assumptions out of your determination to not like it.
aka "Stop liking what I don't like."
"Just sayin'"
 

Vonnis

New member
Feb 18, 2011
418
0
0
Austin Howe said:
Ok, let me make this clear. I have not played it yet. Actually, I can't honestly say I plan to play it.

But these are the facts: Gearbox attained the project after 3d Realms worked on it for almost a decade. Frankly, I wouldn't be suprised if all Gearbox was able to do were a few touches and basically finishing levels and such. Basically, most of the bad design decisions were 3D Realms. We knew this was coming. It's pretty much your fault for holding out hope. Just Saiyan.
It was Gearbox' decision to keep 3d Realms' bad decisions as they were. They could have easily changed this, but they didn't, so the game sucking as hard as it does is entirely their fault. If they didn't like what 3d Realms were doing they shouldn't have taken over development to begin with and either leave the game in development hell, or make a new game. Or, you know, make some very simple tweaks so you don't piss off everyone old enough to remember what FPS used to be like.
 

Truly-A-Lie

New member
Nov 14, 2009
719
0
0
I finished it yesterday, and I like it. It's fun, it's funny, and it feels neither new nor old. It's a bizarre experience stuck somewhere in time and it feels different because of it.
Oh, and it DID have puzzles when it was under 3D Realms. This video leaked just after the official cancellation of the game, just about when Gearbox first got involved to take over.
[link]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOTwfNTBiW0[/link]
 

Zorpheus

New member
Aug 19, 2009
158
0
0
I'm just curious as to how everyone is playing and panning a game that isn't due for release in another four days.

Are those sirens I'm hearing in the distance?
 

Triforceformer

New member
Jun 16, 2009
1,286
0
0
kayisking said:
It was gearbox's choice to implement a two weapon limit.
It was gearbox's choice to switch to regenerative health.
It was gearbox's choice to add in puzzle elements.
It is gearbox's fault the game sucks.
It was 3D Realms' decision to add in the 2-weapon swap and health regen. Gearbox just respected their decision.
What's wrong with puzzles?
Opinions, broskis.
 

Zeetchmen

New member
Aug 17, 2009
338
0
0
Dr. McD said:
I disagree, it's more like...

It was 3D realms' choice to switch to regenerative health.
It was 3D realms' choice to add in puzzle elements.
It is 3D realms' fault the game sucks.
It was Gearbox's choice to change none of this, you don't complain about the soup made being shit when it's your fault that you took somebody else's recipe, saw that it was crap, and decided to go with that instead of starting from scratch.
Amen, all these gearbox fanbois being like "But they was given it!" Dont seem to take that little bit of info into the equation
 

endnuen

New member
Sep 20, 2010
533
0
0
It's a game? Will people relax a bit?
I haven't got it yet, since I wasn't home for release and now it's weekend and holiday Monday.. Will pick it up Tuesday and see if people are just getting their hair stuck in their own asses. And I really do think they have.
 

endnuen

New member
Sep 20, 2010
533
0
0
Zorpheus said:
I'm just curious as to how everyone is playing and panning a game that isn't due for release in another four days.

Are those sirens I'm hearing in the distance?
It got released in Europe on June 10th.
 

Macrobstar

New member
Apr 28, 2010
896
0
0
Atmos Duality said:
PureChaos said:
the only thing i'm looking forward to about the release of this game is Yahtzee's review of it
Who knows, he might actually put forth some credible dissertation for once rather than attacking his audience or some other tangential topic for a change.

...Aw who am I a kidding. I know what really pays the bills and gets the website hits.
Just a guess here but are you a fan of the witcher 2?
 

MiracleOfSound

Fight like a Krogan
Jan 3, 2009
17,776
0
0
Dr. McD said:
It was Gearbox's choice to change none of this, you don't complain about the soup made being shit when it's your fault that you took somebody else's recipe, saw that it was crap, and decided to go with that instead of starting from scratch.
You also don't hunt down the previous owner if a used car salesman sells you a hunk of junk... Gearbox probably should have enforced more quality control on the game before releasing it.
 

MrSnugglesworth

Into the Wild Green Snuggle
Jan 15, 2009
3,232
0
0
I think Gearbox deserves it. I love them but they knew full well what they were doing.

It's not like the current gen console gamers had any fucking clue what Duke Nukem was anyway. I have 5 friends who loved MW2 and Black Ops. None of them knew what Duke Nukem was.

Modernizing it for people who were expecting the old Duke was a hilariously misguided idea.
 

MasterV

New member
Aug 9, 2010
301
0
0
The Wykydtron said:
Ah I love the way people try to defend Gearbox, another fact is that Gearbox stamped their name on the box. If you have enough faith in a product to stamp your company's name and logo onto the box, trailers etc you must therefore be able to take at least some of the rap rather than just shoving all the blame onto 3D Realms

Just waiting for a statement by Gearbox... Annnnny day now
You said it brother. I wonder what other excuses they'll concoct to cover up how shit they made this game.
 

TheScottishFella

The Know-it all Detective
Nov 9, 2009
613
0
0
kayisking said:
It was gearbox's choice to implement a two weapon limit.
It was gearbox's choice to switch to regenerative health.
It was gearbox's choice to add in puzzle elements.
It is gearbox's fault the game sucks.
And these have worked in other games, so why not in this one?

For the record I am still playing the game, and some of the hate is justified while others, is just not called for. However, they are opinions, so I can't say they are wrong. However, when a game takes 12 years it gives trolls and gamers who like to *****, great ammunition. I realize with that I am probably going to get a lot of sh..
 

HotFezz8

New member
Nov 1, 2009
1,139
0
0
PureChaos said:
the only thing i'm looking forward to about the release of this game is Yahtzee's review of it

THIS!!! THIS A MILLION TIMES!!!

lol that comment was so perfect you earnt yourself a friend request ;-)
 

vrbtny

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2009
1,959
0
41
PureChaos said:
the only thing i'm looking forward to about the release of this game is Yahtzee's review of it
He'll spend the first half of the review chiding it over taking so long to be released, and then the second half taunting American's about how it was released in Aus four days before America, rather than four years later.

We won't get a actual review.....