Can a lightsaber cut through adamantium??

Recommended Videos

gamemeister27

New member
Oct 26, 2009
20
0
0
You forget, after adamantium has been heated to a liquid once, it will never melt again (I don't get it either, but it is cannon I believe) Therefore, the heat of the light saber would just make it rather hot, but it would not make any cut.
 

CloakedOne

New member
Oct 1, 2009
590
0
0
TimeLord said:
Well a Lightsaber can't cut through Phrik alloy according to canon. That's all I know.

I would think that the result of Lightsaber meets Adamantium would be similar or the lightaber would take a loooong time to cut through it.

Loud Noise said:
I think the lightsaber could cut through it, but I agree it would take a really long time. I mean, when you think about it, adamantium can be heated to produce a liquid and since lightsabers probably generate heat that would help cut through the adamantium.
But according to XMen: Origins it can only be liquidised in it's ore form, one cooled after being liquidised it is indestructible, bar adamantium weapons (i.e. Striker's Adamantium bullets)
Phrik alloy can be cut, it just takes a few tries to do it. Beskar, on the other hand, is definitely the biggest problem to a lightsaber. Cortosis can cause a feedback loop that shuts it off, but it's so fragile that the force of the blow might make it crumble.

Regarding the actual question about Adamantium vs. a lightsaber: I must admit, I'm stumped. There are certain metallic alloys that can resist it quite effectively, but it's also a magical weapon and not purely a technological one since it heavily involves the Force. the Force, being the wildcard that it is, leaves me with more questions than answers. I guess I'll offer this: if a non-Force adept is using a lightsaber, I think that the adamantium would win every time. Versus a Force Adept with a lot of focus and power to put into the weapon, it might make the adamantium able to be cut. That's my theory, hope it helps!
 

pretentiousname01

New member
Sep 30, 2009
476
0
0
I would like to make this speculation.

Could it be in the star wars universe, Cortosis weaves, vibro blades and the like are in fact, Made of adamantium? Perhaps improving on the comic book recipe to varying degrees. Which could then account for why sometimes you can cut through it, sometimes can't?
 

havass

New member
Dec 15, 2009
1,298
0
0
No, Adamantium's indestructible. Even if it could, in a fight against Wolverine and lightsabers, Wolverine will kick the other guy's ass. If lightsabers can cut through adamantium, it'll take awhile, and in that awhile, bad things will happen to the wielder of the lightsaber.
 

KiKiweaky

New member
Aug 29, 2008
972
0
0
If a scary man/ork/space marine with a powerfist could tear a tank apart i think a lightsabre could do it no problem.
 

JackandTom

New member
Nov 17, 2010
603
0
0
What type of Adumantium? Wolverines? Because if so, there wouldn't be a chance to cut through it.....you'd already be dead :)
 

Vrach

New member
Jun 17, 2010
3,223
0
0
TimeLord said:
Well a Lightsaber can't cut through Phrik alloy according to canon. That's all I know.
Yep, there's actually several materials within the SW EU a lightsaber can't cut through. Few mentioned here - http://www.torocast.com/index.php/editorials/item/379-lightsabers-pt1

Can go by more than one logic:
- Lightsaber can cut through anything but the certain listed materials (see above), adamantium not on the list - it can cut through it
- Unstoppable force, immovable object logic - above logic applied, but in the X-men universe, adamantium can't be cut by things, lightsaber included so - it'll either reflect or go right through it, either way, not cutting it

- What I find most reasonable though - adamantium can be "shaped" when in it's molten form, which is at very high temperatures, but can't be cut through when cooled. However, since a lightsaber effectively heats it up, I'm guessing it would look something like Qui'Gon cutting through the blast doors in Phantom Menace - a slow process where the adamantium would slowly melt and while it wouldn't be destroyed by the lightsaber, it could be cut through for the purpose of going through an adamantium door, cutting an adamantium limb off (although with the time requirement, it'd likely require the subject incapacitated first, so not necessarily useful in fast paced combat) and such, leaving the portion of the "cut" adamantium puddling down for a small while (think liquid Terminator :p ) until it cools off and becomes solid again.
 

sumanoskae

New member
Dec 7, 2007
1,526
0
0
I dunno. Maybe we should just have Stan Lee and George Lucas dress in cosplay and beat the hell out of each other until one of them gets knocked out. Then the winner can write the "Wolverine VS Darth Maul" comic
 

spwatkins

New member
Nov 11, 2009
108
0
0
I write software for Ultrasound systems and based on what I've learned, I think that a light sword might be a feasible technology. An ultrasound probe could easily described as a "sound sword". An array of transducer elements generate little chirps of sound waves which are carefully delayed so that over a narrow "sword-shaped" range the waveforms augment each other while in other places the waves are uncorrelated and cancel out. It's not too big a stretch to imagine that a similar thing might be done with light waves. In that case, it's not that the photons travel for a distance and stop, it's that the separate bursts of protons keep going but are uncorrelated.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
Sam_Winchester said:
This question has bugged me ever since I heard it on the RoosterTeeth Drunk Tank Podcast (for those of you who don't know what that is, go download it for free from iTunes). In truth, I believe it absolutely could do it, it would just be a long time to do it, like the adamantium would be fighting with the lightsaber.

What do you think happens?
While I have seen a theorised lightsabre made out of plasma (they can't use light 'cos the beam would go on forever, like out into the universe style), they used magnets to control the plasma. It was quite interesting programme to watch.

Since I am not a wolverine fanboy I have no idea how heat resistant the metal is, but I have seen that Xmen were the woman gets injected with it, so it seems easy to make into a liquid.

I would say it would cut it with ease 'cos plasma is silly hot.
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
Well, I remember someone cutting through a door with one and that took a bit so no. Not to mention the weave thingy.
 

shootthebandit

New member
May 20, 2009
3,867
0
0
Sam_Winchester said:
This question has bugged me ever since I heard it on the RoosterTeeth Drunk Tank Podcast (for those of you who don't know what that is, go download it for free from iTunes). In truth, I believe it absolutely could do it, it would just be a long time to do it, like the adamantium would be fighting with the lightsaber.

What do you think happens?
i think we are missing a very valid point, if theoretically a lightsaber could cut through wolverines adamantium, wouldnt his "human" skeletal/body structure just repair the damage done by the lightsaber. what im saying is his human skelton would simply rapidly heal and replace the damaged adamantium with bone. the adamantium could then be repaired at a later date
 

BiscuitWheels

New member
Jan 10, 2009
256
0
0
Hell, Luke's lightsaber bounced off Vader's shoulder with just a few sparks in Empire. It's just a fancy laser sword.
 

tologna

New member
Aug 6, 2009
106
0
0
brandon237 said:
tologna said:
DarkenedWolfEye said:
tologna said:
No, it would just heat it until it is the same temperature as the beam. Adamantium doesn't melt, therefore a lightsaber can't cut it.
However, it's not as though the lightsabre can only cut through things that melt. It's cut through many things that didn't melt, like solid bone.
*sigh* Lightsabers "cut" things by rapidly melting them. Like a plasma-torch, there is no actual blade... Phisics Fail.
Bones don't melt... and light / plasma beams do not stop each-other in their tracks... There is *something* else at work if two lightsabers can block each-other...

I think it would eventually destroy the adamantium, that high energy would probably screw with the metal at an atomic level.
The only reason bones don't melt is because they disintagrate<sp first. Which is how a lightsaber "cuts" them, and plants, and other not-meltable-but-still-burnable substances. To our best knowledge, "addy" isn't burnable either.
 

Brandon237

New member
Mar 10, 2010
2,959
0
0
tologna said:
brandon237 said:
tologna said:
DarkenedWolfEye said:
tologna said:
No, it would just heat it until it is the same temperature as the beam. Adamantium doesn't melt, therefore a lightsaber can't cut it.
However, it's not as though the lightsabre can only cut through things that melt. It's cut through many things that didn't melt, like solid bone.
*sigh* Lightsabers "cut" things by rapidly melting them. Like a plasma-torch, there is no actual blade... Phisics Fail.
Bones don't melt... and light / plasma beams do not stop each-other in their tracks... There is *something* else at work if two lightsabers can block each-other...

I think it would eventually destroy the adamantium, that high energy would probably screw with the metal at an atomic level.
The only reason bones don't melt is because they disintagrate<sp first. Which is how a lightsaber "cuts" them, and plants, and other not-meltable-but-still-burnable substances. To our best knowledge, "addy" isn't burnable either.
If a lightsaber is hot enough to almost instantaneously turn bone into mist, it is more than likely hot enough to, however slowly, melt the adamantium. Although there is of course only one way to truly settle the argument... GEORGE!

On a side note, the metal with the highest melting point is tungsten, which melts at less than 4000 degrees Celsius, and the plasma in the sun is at 6000 degrees celsius, and it is relatively safe to assume that: lightsabers are at least hot enough to turn nitrogen (main stable component in a life-supporting atmosphere) into plasma, and that nitrogen does not turn into plasma all that easily. In fact most solids boil well below 6000 degrees... I don't think Wolvy is gonna win this one...
 

tologna

New member
Aug 6, 2009
106
0
0
brandon237 said:
tologna said:
brandon237 said:
tologna said:
DarkenedWolfEye said:
tologna said:
No, it would just heat it until it is the same temperature as the beam. Adamantium doesn't melt, therefore a lightsaber can't cut it.
However, it's not as though the lightsabre can only cut through things that melt. It's cut through many things that didn't melt, like solid bone.
*sigh* Lightsabers "cut" things by rapidly melting them. Like a plasma-torch, there is no actual blade... Phisics Fail.
Bones don't melt... and light / plasma beams do not stop each-other in their tracks... There is *something* else at work if two lightsabers can block each-other...

I think it would eventually destroy the adamantium, that high energy would probably screw with the metal at an atomic level.
The only reason bones don't melt is because they disintagrate<sp first. Which is how a lightsaber "cuts" them, and plants, and other not-meltable-but-still-burnable substances. To our best knowledge, "addy" isn't burnable either.
If a lightsaber is hot enough to almost instantaneously turn bone into mist, it is more than likely hot enough to, however slowly, melt the adamantium. Although there is of course only one way to truly settle the argument... GEORGE!

On a side note, the metal with the highest melting point is tungsten, which melts at less than 4000 degrees Celsius, and the plasma in the sun is at 6000 degrees celsius, and it is relatively safe to assume that: lightsabers are at least hot enough to turn nitrogen (main stable component in a life-supporting atmosphere) into plasma, and that nitrogen does not turn into plasma all that easily. In fact most solids boil well below 6000 degrees... I don't think Wolvy is gonna win this one...
If this were taking-place in reality, I would agree... Addy is a fictional material, which is really the only thing that allows it to be so durable in the first place. So, it's really ONLY a matter of cannon v.s. cannon in this case.