DVS BSTrD said:
I don't see why people have to assume that guys who start out being friendly to girls are pigs because they also want to sleep with them. I mean, if they were players who just wanted to bang and run, then wouldn't they do that? Is it so hard to believe a guy can actually care about a girl who just isn't interested in him? Or he presents himself in totally the wrong way because he's awkward as hell? Why does everybody assume it's some kind of excuse? It's called Friendzone because they aren't going to see you as anything more (or different) then a friend. it DOES actually happen!
I think you're misunderstanding the source of hostility towards the term, or the vaunted "nice guy" label.
FINE AND GOOD: Courting someone because you fancy them romantically.
FINE AND GOOD: Feeling sad because your affections were unrequited.
NOT FINE AND GOOD: Assuming that you were rejected because you were "too nice", or that not being interested in you romantically indicates a character failure on the part of the person rejecting you.
NOT FINE AND GOOD: Assuming that "kindness" is a currency you directly exchange for sexual attention, and implying...directly or indirectly...that not being sexually rewarded for kindness is a moral crime.
Like I say, I don't really have an issue with the term "friend zone", but it got rather co-opted over the years by a lot of angry young misogynists who felt female sexual attention was their due for existing, and their accumulated frustration towards the opposite sex turned the status of "friend" into a loathsome penalty. There's absolutely nothing wrong with feeling pain or rejection as a consequence of unrequited love, the term "friend zone" just has a lot of ugly baggage now. Which is a shame, because it can still be fairly amusing when it's not being used in a sullen or petulant fashion. I got a good laugh out of Ser Jorah of House Friendzone, for example.