This. What's the plan?CM156 said:I'm with you
I want to see all the facts before I pass judgement.
Would you two kindly take it outside? Your argument (which seems to stem mostly from conflicting personal opinions) really doesn't need to be aired out in the open. I'd like to suggest that you take it to PM, but better yet would be to drop it entirely.Noelveiga said:Yet more stuff.Ilyak1986 said:More stuff.Noelveiga said:Stuff.
My main issue was that your argument didn't have much to do with the actual issue at hand anymore, but it doesn't matter. Seems to be over anyway.Noelveiga said:You do realize this is an internet forum, right? They are entirely built around the concept of discussing and arguing with people who disagree with you based on morals and values out in the open. That's the whole point.
For the record, not a bad thing at all to do. Exposing yourself to people who disagree with you is the way to keep an open mind. I can see how a libertarian would call that a waste of time, though. Since we're butchering quotes, there's this great interview with Stephen Fry where he explains how it took him a while to realize that Americans who invite you to their house for dinner and conversation do not expect you to disagree with them on politics (or anything else, for that matter) and consider it impolite for you to do that openly.
I just want every one to be happy, i don't care who's right or wrong in my opinion no ones in the wrong. This was supposed to help some one and now it become bitter i just wish we could all go-CWestfall said:Things are getting crazy in a hurry. Both the Extra Credits team (And by that I guess I mean James) and The Escapist (And by that I suppose I just mean this Alex fellow) are having an e-shouting match trying to look like the only reasonable one involved here. It's really very damn hard to figure out who is in the wrong when both stories are such stark contrasts, even moreso for the non-lawyers in the audience. What does seem obvious is that this is the result of poor communication.
In that spirit I'm going to avoid making any harsh judgements until some actual facts and proof come to light. The current trend of painting James as a lazy hipster or The Escapist as some kind of evil corporate overlord on shreds of "He-Said-She-Said" bull____ just does not make a lick of sense. So, for my part? No boycotts. No mud flinging. None of that.
Who's with me on this one?
Join the "Let's Think This One Through, Guys" bandwagon today!
If I had a penny for every time someone who doesnt understand law tries to draft a document or to interpret law, I would literally have a new car by now.JPArbiter said:"Raises hand"
to me this sounds like what happens when people do not let lawyers write contracts.