I think the reason some are fairly indecipherable is that reCAPTCHA is supposed to give you one word that an optical character recognition (OCR) program can recognize and one that it can not. The idea is that your input is only checked on the known word, and they use your input for the unknown word to decipher the text that it came from.Double A said:onecusta nr&st
I just had to type that to post this thread. I'm sure many of you reading this had to type some similar gibberish to reply to another thread earlier today. Now, I have nothing against spam-protection, but isn't it a little odd that people who have high post counts and have been registered for months, even years, get a spambot check every once in a while? If it's not too inconvenient, I believe a system should be set up where, once a user reaches a certain post count and, say, two weeks registration time, they should no longer have to suffer having to type indecipherable nonsense.
This relies on the used OCR's ability to identify whether it was able to read something or not. The word that it cannot read can basically be anything, including non-words. For this word, it also doesn't matter what you fill in, as far as the captcha goes. However, sometimes an OCR will think it was able to decipher a word, when it was really not able to. In this case you are basically screwed.
What I really don't understand is why we have captcha's here at all. We don't even need to look at someone's postcount and/or how long they have been a member. We can just look at who managed to get an account and log in. Put the captcha at the registration process. Maybe use a captcha when logging in. Do we really get spam from "good" accounts? Was it explained somewhere why The Escapist felt the need for this?