you wouldn't have survived the devices to keep young guys from getting erections and masturbating in the victorian era, when they thought dudes only had a limited amount of semen, hahahazHellas said:Victorian Era England; The Wild West times(not sure when it started); and/or 1900-1959.
Yes, my point though was that it was an imitation of much older villages. I don't really care where that village was set in time, supposedly it's staying the same through all the time periods. I just think it looked like a nice place to live.Dags90 said:That was actually a modern village that simply decided to forgo technology, sort of like the Amish.Kpt._Rob said:But fine, if I can't be there, can I be transported to the rediculously romantacized ancient Japanese village from the final short film from Akira Kurasawa's Dreams? That place looked like a nice place to live.
I would do the same.The Normish said:1785, so that I could live through the Napoleonic Era.
I second thisRed Right Hand said:1960's. Why? The great San Franscisco Acid Wave.
I love that quote good old carl seganAnarchemitis said:"How lucky we are, to live in this time, the first point in human history where we are, in fact, visiting other worlds. A still more glorious dawn awaits, not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise, a morning filled with four-hundred-billions, the rising of the milky way. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSgiXGELjbc]"
-Carl Sagan.
Never!! That will violate the prime directiveIzisviAziria said:read the OP.Red Right Hand said:1960's. Why? The great San Franscisco Acid Wave.
Sorry. Totally dig your reasoning thoughkinggingerman said:Just to prevent any spoilsports the late and middle 20th century is not availabePerhaps OP will let you be a chemist in the late 19th century, and you can discover acid yourself? Doubt it though, he doesn't seem to want any significant changes made to history.