Chad Lieberman Steals from Dozens of Artists

Recommended Videos

DoubleTime

New member
Apr 23, 2010
182
0
0
I've already posted about this on deviantART and CNN iReport, but I wanted to spread the word even more.

deviantART ------> http://juor.deviantart.com/journal/43415948/

iReport ------> http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-654673

Text for those who don't want to leave the Escapist:
This has been circulating on deviantART as a major issue this last week. For anyone not familar with the site, it's a community where artists can upload their works to share and comment on one another.

Recently Chad Lieberman, the nephew of the politician Joseph Lieberman, was interviewed for the sfchronicle site and shown posing with art he claimed was his own. Most of the art, however, wasn't his but was actually lifted from the artists of deviantART.

This art was for sale on his site art4love.com which has now been taken down for copyright infringement, as has the site markyourspot.com, which replaced art4love almost immediately with the same stolen content.

He was selling copies of the pictures for thousands of dollars each, some of which had been personal pieces done by artists and never sold. In addition it has been found that a book he published titled Creative Warriors Walk Alone is actually a plagiarized version of The Business Side of Creativity by Cameron Foote.

So far little headway has been made other than the removal of the sites. Chad has made no response.

Hopefully this extreme case of plagiarism and art theft being brought to the attention of people outside the deviantART community can help connect others whose art has been stolen and bring justice to those who have been so gravely wronged.

Sources:

http://alexiuss.deviantart.com/art/MASSIVE-COPYRIGHT-INFRINGEMENT-253771563

http://gene-ash.deviantart.com/art/Art4life-com-stolen-art-253359597

http://news.deviantart.com/article/158845/

http://sflchronicle.com/news/entertainment/2010/05/love-conquers-all-chad-lieberman-tells-trees-how-to-succeed-in-multimedia-art/

http://sflchronicle.com/chronic-featured/chronic-art/2011/08/chad-love-lieberman-art-thief/

Chad Lieberman has been stealing art from dozens of DA artists and selling it as his own. His sites have been shut down but he's unresponsive to the artists he stole from. A class action lawsuit appears to be in the works but due to the cost, and the notoriously empty bank accounts of artists not to mention the vast distances between everyone he stole from, it's turning out to be a struggle.

I wanted mostly to share this, but do any other members have ideas about what could be done, both to hold him responsible as well as spread the word about this?

What do you think should happen?

Personally I want to see every penny go to the artists and everyone who bought a piece informed of it's origin and given the chance to return it, at a refund out of pocket for Chad. Plus I think he should be required to reimburse the artists for court costs and any other damages.

EDIT:

Fixed the links to the iReport and deviantART.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Wow, that's insane. Hopefully the actual artists get compensated, and hopefully the guy goes to prison.

Seems he just stepped into... the danger-zone. Which would be prison. Hopefully.

Doesn't look like Burt Reynolds either, so he'll be fucked. Both figuratively, and if unlucky, literally.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Thankfully, none of my works are good enough to steal, but I feel for those who were ripped off. Lynch the man if you have to.
 

Kolby Jack

Come at me scrublord, I'm ripped
Apr 29, 2011
2,519
0
0
Wait a minute... this is freaking unreal!





Deviantart isn't just a softcore porn site?! WHAT?!?!?

 

DoubleTime

New member
Apr 23, 2010
182
0
0
itchcrotch said:
dozens? the number has since shot up to well over 200 artists!
I initially wanted to say "hundreds" rather than "dozens," but I couldn't find any solid numbers in any journals or articles on DA. :/ It came from a quick tally of a couple lists of artists, but I'm certain they were by no means complete.
 

scw55

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1,185
0
0
Well, the thing is. When you upload a piece of artwork anywhere without a watermark then scumbags like this will do that. I always ensure when I upload images on Deviant art that I select the options of "Watermark images, allow creative use licence (able to use my images for non-profitable uses) to cover my arse for when something like this happens.

I hope this event will shock all people who upload their work onto the internet to be more careful how they upload it so a scumbag won't take advantage of it again.

If I was a victim, I would be actually flattered (as well as angry) that people would actually pay money for my work. Lets see if I was one so I can perhaps claim some munnies...

Jack the Potato said:
Wait a minute... this is freaking unreal!

Deviantart isn't just a softcore porn site?! WHAT?!?!?

It's apparently also not just a site for terribley awful fanart that looks like a 6 year old drew it.
 

Sonicron

Do the buttwalk!
Mar 11, 2009
5,133
0
0
As much as I'd like to see the bastard stripped of his possessions for this (so the real artists can be reimbursed), it ultimately comes down to this: He's got connections and money. They don't. Hence, I don't think the legal system will be much help here.
Hopefully Mr Lieberman will at least suffer irreparable damage to his reputation.