Then people devoted to islam have diverged from the supposed meaning for thousands of years. Since the diversion is so widespread, can it really be called a diversion?Eoin Livingston said:Now that I don't agree with.Novan Leon said:You could make the argument that Jihad is an important part of the Islamic religion, but does this mean we should tolerate Jihad? There has to be an objective moral standard which we can agree on or else anything and everything becomes valid and morally permissible.
Jihad is only supposed to be used as a last resort and it is never offensive moves, only defensive. The modern interpretation of this has been warped by the terrorist organisations who have harmed they're own people more than they've harmed Western society.