Chinese company has copyrighted.... ahegao.
- Thread starter Specter Von Baren
- Start date
Recommended Videos
- Status
Well that was an entertaining read until it wasn't.
As a far far far far faaaar lefty, I would like to abuse the alleged power we got, referred to as "cancel culture" to cancel anime plz? Where do you apply for access to this weapon? Would ask Soros, but he ain't got back to me since I tried asking him for a tenner, claiming it was for antifa related hijinks.
As a far far far far faaaar lefty, I would like to abuse the alleged power we got, referred to as "cancel culture" to cancel anime plz? Where do you apply for access to this weapon? Would ask Soros, but he ain't got back to me since I tried asking him for a tenner, claiming it was for antifa related hijinks.
Last edited:
Sometimes you turn over a rock, you find things you'd rather not have seen. Not that what you find surprises you, mind, but you'd really rather wish it had stayed out of sight and mind.
Edit: for example...
Does being against pedophilia really require a good argument?
Last edited:
I've only seen one (non-hentai) anime where people actually have sex (nice boat). Granted, there's a lot of anime out there that I haven't seen, but I very much doubt that "most" anime includes underage sex scenes.
So would you jump off a bridge if I told you that gravity is a conspiracy perpetuated by the government? No. Because that's a bad argument. We wouldn't be against pedophilia if there wasn't a good argument against it.
I've always wanted an official seal on my ahegao apparel.
Also you guys should know how easy it is to get around a rule like "no depicting minors in sexual situations": just write a disclaimer that they are over the AoC. Moreover, in the internet age censorship is only good for a nice little facade unless you go all in and muster a whole porn police to control it. And that is a waste of effort if you want to combat harm as degeneracy is thus far usually a symptom and not a cause. Now the slippery slope is there and that's why I agree that we ought to have tenacity in our morals instead of "if it doesn't harm anyone it's okay to do". One usually fantasizes about things they don't have, and I think it's important that the emphasis is always on people to try to pursue those things in reality instead of lulling about in their gaming chairs and ahegao hoodies. Pedo stuff is a notch beyond any "regular" degeneracy and more like an illness or mental condition.
Also you guys should know how easy it is to get around a rule like "no depicting minors in sexual situations": just write a disclaimer that they are over the AoC. Moreover, in the internet age censorship is only good for a nice little facade unless you go all in and muster a whole porn police to control it. And that is a waste of effort if you want to combat harm as degeneracy is thus far usually a symptom and not a cause. Now the slippery slope is there and that's why I agree that we ought to have tenacity in our morals instead of "if it doesn't harm anyone it's okay to do". One usually fantasizes about things they don't have, and I think it's important that the emphasis is always on people to try to pursue those things in reality instead of lulling about in their gaming chairs and ahegao hoodies. Pedo stuff is a notch beyond any "regular" degeneracy and more like an illness or mental condition.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,526
- 4,295
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
You are really mistaken about how much of this is in anime.
It actually does, everything requires a good argument in the end. Like the argument against pedophilia is that
1. children cannot give informed consent since they have no idea about everything involved in the act of sex and the ramifications of such.
2. Even if the child is consenting the power dynamic between a child and an adult or even an older child is so different that its impossible to tell. Same reason that relationships between bosses and workers/teacher and student are seen as immoral.
- Sep 8, 2014
- 1,109
- 64
- 53
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,526
- 4,295
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
I just gave you a good argument to use against it. Go sit in the corner and think about what you just said.
- Sep 8, 2014
- 1,109
- 64
- 53
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
Yet you keep arguing against people saying it is bad and should be removed from media? In my books that looks like defending it.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,526
- 4,295
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
Just saying something is bad, is not an argument, you have to be able to actually have to be able to say why its bad.
- Sep 8, 2014
- 1,109
- 64
- 53
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
I disagree.
Murdering someone is bad. If you need to have an argument of why it is bad, then I am worried about you because it should be obvious why it is bad and the argument doesn't need to be stated.
And the same, to me and I'm betting to many others, applies to pedophilia.
Last edited:
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,526
- 4,295
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
What it someone is trying to hurt you or someone you love and you kill them in the process of defending yourself, is that still wrong? Or what about executing someone for murder?
- Sep 8, 2014
- 1,109
- 64
- 53
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
Murder - the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
What you gave as examples are not murder. Please try again.
- Apr 1, 2009
- 15,526
- 4,295
- 118
- Gender
- Whatever, just wash your hands.
Because you are being nonsensical. You are making the argument that because something is seen as bad, its bad. I can swap it on you back when everyone knew being gay was bad, or that race mixing was bad too. Being gay was bad then and so was race mixing, why aren't those bad now?
Would you care to give me an example scenario where sexually abusing a child is an act of self-defense?
- Sep 8, 2014
- 1,109
- 64
- 53
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
I just gave you the literal definition of murder. What you gave were examples of people being killed, but that isn't what murder is.
Planning to kill someone outside the confines of the law is bad.
There are laws in place to explain why killing someone in self-defense is acceptable, thus not murder.
Death as punishment determined by the law is acceptable by the law, thus not murder.
It isn't nonsense for me to say that murder is bad and I don't need to defend that statement with any argument.
I genuinely don't know what you want out of this argument. Are you suggesting that everyone everywhere should have some uniform conscience that knows what is objectively right or wrong without thinking about it or communicating?
Edit: to be clear, nobody is defending bad things here. But you seem to think it a dangerous sign that someone is working to understand right and wrong, when I think it's far more dangerous when someone thinks they don't have to put in effort to maintain an informed conscience. Counting on just knowing right from wrong without thinking about it is a risky play at best.
- Status