PurpleRain said:
Computer fanyboisms aside for a quick sec, would it be worth it trying to aquire it on the 360? The other RTS's on consoles are just plain terrible but this should be so much better because of the turn base system.
The 360 version is a solid game. It's not so much dumbed-down as I've heard a lot from people, but it is definitely simplified from the computer one (you might think that "simplified" and "dumbed-down" are the same thing, and, hell, you might be right). The game is pretty clearly more focused on military objectives rather than the other options present on the computer, as evidenced by the fact that even when you make alliances with people, they seem to constantly hold the threat of war over your head unless you give them things.
"Oh yeah, Russia? Really? No, you can't have my technology. But you can have two feet of cold steel in your gullet."
This doesn't make it a bad game, though. There are a couple new features that make building armies a little more fun, like being able to join individual groups together into bigger platoons and customizable promotions.
It should also be noted that it's not an RTS, it's turn-based, but the game moves along at a satisfying clip so it never really feels (to me) like it's too slow-paced to hold my attention, whether it's the console or PC version.
Bottom line: Yes, Civilization Revolution for the 360 is a solid pick-up, though I personally prefer the more complex Civilization IV (and the Beyond the Sword expansion) for the PC.
Also: Yes, Damn Dirty Ape, you heard right. You can't save in the middle of a game for the 360 or PS3 versions, which is a really confusing choice on the developer's part.
EDIT: Sorry I didn't read carefully enough to realize you already knew it was turn-based. Durr.