FranckelSeijenmai said:
That dear sir is not mary sueness thats bad assery.All (unfunny) jokes aside though i think its better that way, theirs just so much more importance to it . A charcters death actually means something when you've gotten the chance to know them over the course of time,to love them or hate them, to feel something for them.They become human(fictional i know but still) not just red shirts(though their are plently of those) waiting to die.That it it creates, dare i say it a sense of concern for them, any of them can die at any given time.(probably towards the end of the book )I damn near cryed when Try again died and Caff's death was positively tragic .Though they do take a lot of baddies out with them so i'll give you that.
Ok, I generally agree with that, but I still think some of the redshirts could have been given more character. Also, alot of the named characters that get killed off wont be ghosts, they'll be one-off characters from other regiments that don't last the entirety of the book. There's no reason why more people like that can't be killed off.
Also, I think it doesn't help how a big fuss will be made over named characters, but very little over anything else. I find emphasising the deaths too much is very counter productive and tends to cheapen the deaths of everyone else. The ones I tend to feel more are the ones that have been given some kind of character, but then are quickly written off as casually as anyone else.