Sensationalistic hypocritical journalism, gets shot down, again. Also, tread necros in real life. lol
The United States hasn't had a female president yet, man they must be living in a darker age than Costa Rica.Nemu said:Of course, just because their crime is lower, it doesn't mean that Japanese women aren't treated as well as women in other countries are, IE: more rights, freedom of speech, etc. So as low as the crime rate is, the country is still living in a bit darker age than other modern countries.
It wasn't meant to be a valid point or reflect the country within which YOU live. My statement was made to reflect the fallacy through which your logic works. Because something in Japan is not the way it within the society where you live, or within another "modern"(Countries can be modern for a number of different reasons) country, that automatically makes it inferior? No matter how enlightenend you believe you may be, values and beliefs are different everywhere. And different does not necessarily mean worse.Nemu said:TY for assuming I'm American.
And the first female president elected in 2010 =/= great social consciousness.
Course this "debate" doesn't negate the fact that Japanese women are still treated as inferior compared to countries like those in North America and Europe, now does it? The game is still disgusting.
That is quite the argument, and exactly an argument that puts raping in games before raping in reality. I wouldn't drive around in New York in a stolen car, killing hookers and blowing shit up, tho the idea of action is intriguing for human beings in general, else why would we have movies, books, shooting ranges and war-reenactments? I'd rather have a rapist sitting at home beating off to this stuff than loose in a subway station at night.WhiteTiger225 said:*snip*
Wanna know why rapists rape? Not because of hornyness, no. They do it for the feel of control (And mommy issues)
*snip again*
Alright...Well for starters the first point is blown away because the legal age is 20 since 1948. Only recently however there have been debates about lowering it to 18.WhiteTiger225 said:Japans legal age (LAst I checked, could have changed) is 16, which already eliminates many statutory rape cases.
Japans current law enforcement standards for handling rape cases is god awful. They half the time deny the rape victim medical treatment (Instead of immedietly getting a rape kit done to her) and instead interrogate the woman, bring her back to the scene of the crime and have her reenact the sexual poses, ask her "Why didnt you fight harder?" and "How many sexual partners have you had?" Yes, Japan IS making strides in gender equality, but they still have a long way to go (Not saying we are perfectly equal mind you).
It is a fact proven by many studies in Japan that most rapes go unreported, as, the way Japanese police handle rape cases, leave women to embaressed or ashamed to actually report their rape.
And there have been many points in which a rape case was found in favor of the accused, simply because they believed the Police testimony over actual evidence.
In Japan, you also have to have a certain extent of injuries for rape to be accepted, unlike in the US where as long as the woman says no, and you stick/keep your dick in her, it is immedietly a rape case.
May I direct you to post 76 on this page: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/7.186139-CNN-RapeLay-Controversy-Sparks-Angry-Response?page=3Abriael said:Aren't you making a quite wild and unwarranted assumption here?the_bearpelt said:Now, if Japan's ability to properly prosecute and report incidents to the degree that America does, then yes, they have less crime.
Personally, I've never been to Japan, so I wouldn't know. However, it is something to consider.
In Japan rape and sexual molestation is reported and punished just like anywhere else in the world, and since Nogami didn't provide data, let me tell you that their sexual crimes rate is twenty times lower than in the US. Do you really think that such an immense chasm could just be due to reporting differences?
Do you seriously think that, if such a reporting and prosecuting problem existed, the usually anti-japanese american media wouldn't dive on it like a flock of vultures instead of recurring to nitpicking on extremely niche, extremely old games?
Come on. A lil of realism wouldn't be bad.
Wait, are you saying I don't agree that censorship isn't the best thing? Because I've said several times that I'm not a huge fan of censorship.incal11 said:Shamanic Rhythm said:snipah, CNN and Rapelay... it's because of this more and more people are actually being prosecuted and going to jail just for some games.the_bearpelt said:snip
To everyone who cares about freedom of speech, even if you disapprove Rapelay and the like:
http://yestofreedom.org/
Okay, why is everyone assuming that I'm of the opinion of things I haven't said or in fact stated I disagreed with?The_root_of_all_evil said:Ok. Let's take a particular example.
I've been watching horror films and things from a very early age. They terrified me. Nowadays, the sight of a claw-fingered killer doesn't - but clowns still make me nervous.
Brain Damage? Buckets and buckets of blood - no effect. But seeing the blood run down the streets in Afghanistan on the News makes me physically sick.
It's a bit raw to push adult situations on children through the popular media (read any newspaper today) and then deny them the chance to live through the fantastical version.
If there's a game where you can use the Wii-mote as a knife to slowly pierce the flesh of someone screaming, then I'd make damn sure that was banned...but then, don't you do that in Resident Evil 4 with some beast? The disconnect is there, so no panic.