Yeah, I don't agree that placing all blame on the officer and none on the injured party equates to defending her. I don't see any way to attribute any blame to her, regardless of whether or not the officer is in any way to blame. Either it was a tragic accident, or an avoidable mistake, either way I can't find any way to blame a mentally unbalanced junkie for anything that happens to her while she's in the care of the police.Rottweiler said:Yes, you did. Was it the policeman's fault the criminal ran, was tased according to policies, and accidentally fell and hurt themselves? According to you, the 'criminally incompetent cop' is at fault.I did not defend the actions of the criminal. Or does pointing out that someone shouldn't have been maimed count as defending their actions?
You attached no responsibility to the criminal, and by definition and by your own words, placed all blame on the Cop. You. Defended. The Criminal.
If that *isn't* your intent, you need to clarify that.
"Criminally incompetent" *might* have been going too far. But yes, I am predisposed to be suspicious of the police.