Could you censor a topless woman by photoshopping in male nipples?

Recommended Videos

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,370
0
0
Considering that the reason Oblivion was re-rated to M after being initially released with a T rating was a mod that used the male nipple texture to give the female characters anatomically correct breasts (the ESRB considered it part of the game instead of user generated content because it was just combining existing assets), I'm going to say no.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
freaper said:
AccursedTheory said:
Silvanus said:
A perfect approach to getting around the censors! Let's go one further-- I propose we cover underdressed women entirely, by photoshopping underdressed men over them.

Then, we hot-blooded straight men can bamboozle the censors and have our fun, right guys? Let's do it! *ahem*.
I think I can meet you half way.

Now you're going to have to censor those male nipples with pictures of women, then with pictures of men, then with pictures of [sub]women, [sub]then with pictures of men, [sub]then with pictures of women...[/sub][/sub][/sub]
I tried my best. I'm afraid I may have acquired a new fetish though...

 

freaper

snuggere mongool
Apr 3, 2010
1,198
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
freaper said:
AccursedTheory said:
Silvanus said:
A perfect approach to getting around the censors! Let's go one further-- I propose we cover underdressed women entirely, by photoshopping underdressed men over them.

Then, we hot-blooded straight men can bamboozle the censors and have our fun, right guys? Let's do it! *ahem*.
I think I can meet you half way.

Now you're going to have to censor those male nipples with pictures of women, then with pictures of men, then with pictures of [sub]women, [sub]then with pictures of men, [sub]then with pictures of women...[/sub][/sub][/sub]
I tried my best. I'm afraid I may have acquired a new fetish though...

Is that Mr. Cena or John Bean?
 

zerragonoss

New member
Oct 15, 2009
333
0
0
Caramel Frappe said:
That's America for you. I kid you not, go to the local mall ... watch some TV commercials, or anything open to the public and you'll notice some really lewd advertising of a woman showing off her body. But as long as no 'nipples' are exposed, they can show as much 'skin' as needed be to draw attention. Hell, chop em up gory movies can be PG-13 with intense violence slapped on there but the moment a movie shows 'nipples', suddenly it's Rated R. I think cutting someone's neck off with a chainsaw with blood flying off like a sprinkler is WAY more graphic & disturbing than seeing a woman's titties ....

Speaking of tits, most PG-13 movies can get away with nudity if they hide the nipples or crotch area. Yeah talk about bullcrap but that's how the American system works. There was a PG-13 movie with a fully nude women with her side boobs showing... but because no nipples were showing, they got away with the 3-4 second scene. (To be fair she immediately went to grab a blanket, in order to cover her front but ... you still see most of her body regardless). But why can men get away with showing nipples? Because our society is mostly ran by the male gender, even though it's still nonsense to let men have their shirts off and flex those pecks.

Men been going topless for centuries though, while we began to overthink about the female body and because 95% of the time women wear bras, we've allowed the sight of their nipples to be taboo ... in public of course. It's not really a sin but you get my drift.
I agree with all of this but the question is, is it actully a bad thing? If so why? This is basicly my question to the eniter thread you may be able to get around the censors this way, but why would you want to? Also if your anwaser is simply you like seeing boobies you may want to reconisder since the more common something is the less special it becomes.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
zerragonoss said:
Caramel Frappe said:
That's America for you. I kid you not, go to the local mall ... watch some TV commercials, or anything open to the public and you'll notice some really lewd advertising of a woman showing off her body. But as long as no 'nipples' are exposed, they can show as much 'skin' as needed be to draw attention. Hell, chop em up gory movies can be PG-13 with intense violence slapped on there but the moment a movie shows 'nipples', suddenly it's Rated R. I think cutting someone's neck off with a chainsaw with blood flying off like a sprinkler is WAY more graphic & disturbing than seeing a woman's titties ....

Speaking of tits, most PG-13 movies can get away with nudity if they hide the nipples or crotch area. Yeah talk about bullcrap but that's how the American system works. There was a PG-13 movie with a fully nude women with her side boobs showing... but because no nipples were showing, they got away with the 3-4 second scene. (To be fair she immediately went to grab a blanket, in order to cover her front but ... you still see most of her body regardless). But why can men get away with showing nipples? Because our society is mostly ran by the male gender, even though it's still nonsense to let men have their shirts off and flex those pecks.

Men been going topless for centuries though, while we began to overthink about the female body and because 95% of the time women wear bras, we've allowed the sight of their nipples to be taboo ... in public of course. It's not really a sin but you get my drift.
I agree with all of this but the question is, is it actully a bad thing? If so why? This is basicly my question to the eniter thread you may be able to get around the censors this way, but why would you want to? Also if your anwaser is simply you like seeing boobies you may want to reconisder since the more common something is the less special it becomes.
1. Sexual Equality of Rights
2. Undermines some of the weird breast feeding laws we have in some parts of the US
3. I like seeing boobies

I'm fairly certain that's all that's really needed - Really, its more. A law should not stand simply because its already on the books. So the question REALLY should be - What does the law against baring your breast (In real life and in media) accomplish?
 

Skatologist

Choke On Your Nazi Cookies
Jan 25, 2014
628
0
21
Why would you replace nipples with nipples? That just makes no sense. Replace them with something everyone likes, like chocolate chips.

Captcha: problem solver

See! Captcha likes my idea
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
FalloutJack said:
Nipples are nipples. It wouldn't be right to leave them uncensored, regardless.


Take that, escapist and censorship. Enjoy the pornography!
You know, this leads me to a question now. If we were to put female nipples on a man...what effect would that have?
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
Aeshi said:
Don't have anything on-topic to say, but this has got to be the single most bizarre thread I've ever seen.
Someone once posted a thread asking if we had to shove a Pokemon up our ass, which one would we choose. Someone chose Cacturne.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
Well.. Who's aroused by female nipples without the boob? Other than some of you super creeps, it's a duo effort.

It's not that the female nipple is the 'bad' part, it's that the package is incomplete without both parts. So no, male nipple would make no difference.
 

Xan Krieger

Completely insane
Feb 11, 2009
2,918
0
0
Aeshi said:
Don't have anything on-topic to say, but this has got to be the single most bizarre thread I've ever seen.
I knew you had to be from Europe where sexuality is OK but violence is bad, here in the US on TV anything sexual is bad but violence is perfectly OK.

OT: The whole situation makes no sense, I suggest everyone just cover their chest. Just have it equal so nobodies boobs are showing, not men's, not women's.
 

Morti

New member
Aug 19, 2008
187
0
0
zerragonoss said:
Men been going topless for centuries though, while we began to overthink about the female body and because 95% of the time women wear bras, we've allowed the sight of their nipples to be taboo ... in public of course. It's not really a sin but you get my drift.
Actually, topless men is a fairly recent thing, 1930s I believe, tied in with the upper classes switching to a good tan being fasionable instead of pale. Men decided that they had enough and excused themselves from wearing tops, of course they never extended the curtesy to women.
 

Mikeybb

Nunc est Durandum
Aug 19, 2014
862
0
0
Fieldy409 said:
You would need extensive documentation to prove those really are man nipples....
That's why I say use one which is covered in curly grey hairs.
Old man nipples need no documentation.
 

Revnak_v1legacy

Fixed by "Monday"
Mar 28, 2010
1,979
0
0
freaper said:
AccursedTheory said:
freaper said:
AccursedTheory said:
Silvanus said:
A perfect approach to getting around the censors! Let's go one further-- I propose we cover underdressed women entirely, by photoshopping underdressed men over them.

Then, we hot-blooded straight men can bamboozle the censors and have our fun, right guys? Let's do it! *ahem*.
I think I can meet you half way.

Now you're going to have to censor those male nipples with pictures of women, then with pictures of men, then with pictures of [sub]women, [sub]then with pictures of men, [sub]then with pictures of women...[/sub][/sub][/sub]
I tried my best. I'm afraid I may have acquired a new fetish though...

Is that Mr. Cena or John Bean?
No, it's Mr. John Beana.
 

GrumbleGrump

New member
Oct 14, 2014
387
0
0
Not really. It would be funny if you photoshopped their nipples with a very hairy pair of nipples.

Johnny Novgorod said:
Sarah Silverman placed a (vertical) photograph of a mouth between her thighs, simulating a vagina, and that got blurred on cable TV.
I think that about answers your question.
Good thing too, that sounds even more disturbing than Sarah Silverman's vagina.