I believe that you are also completely full of shit.purehatred89 said:I'm a misanthropist. I have no empathy for strangers.Dawn Patrol said:You'd gladly kill a stranger?purehatred89 said:Back at school, my English teacher once said to me I was the most likely student he'd ever met to become a serial killer; I took it as a compliment.
Yes I could kill someone, but it depends. I wouldn't kill my friends or family, but I'd gladly kill a stranger or someone I dislike, however only if I could get away with it.
Dude, why?
Well, that may be putting it a bit overtheatrically, but yes, I agree that I could probably kill a true monster with ease as well. You'd call them "dead inside" but I'd just call them "monsters". The Norway butcher in the recent news for example. If I had my way, I'd spare all the effort of a trial, have him legally reclassified a monster rather than a person for his conscious, willing, deliberate, inhuman and monstrous acts, strip him of his human rights and destroy him, the same way we "destroy" animals that attack humans. Not for emotional reasons like revenge or "eye-for-an-eye" justice, but simply because he's a threat to innocent humans and should be destroyed. And I could take a gun and put a bullet in his head myself, without hesitation, then walk away unflinchingly as the body is doused in petrol and burned.Kaisar said:They say you change after killing a person no matter what the circumstances. It is the ones that show no outer effects that are the truly evil ones. I could do. There are people in this world that are already dead, they just don't know it, and I could easily fix their living "issue". People that rape others. Anyone that harms a child in anyway. These people are already dead inside. Why not make the outside match? It would be doing them and everyone else in the world a favor.
The word you are looking for is "psychopath" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy]. You should be tested to make sure you're not just talking shit on the internet to sound tough, then locked up if you're not.purehatred89 said:I'm a misanthropist. I have no empathy for strangers.Dawn Patrol said:You'd gladly kill a stranger?purehatred89 said:Back at school, my English teacher once said to me I was the most likely student he'd ever met to become a serial killer; I took it as a compliment.
Yes I could kill someone, but it depends. I wouldn't kill my friends or family, but I'd gladly kill a stranger or someone I dislike, however only if I could get away with it.
Dude, why?
Blablahb said:But there's a lot of difference between pointing a rifle at some figure in the distance and pulling the trigger, compared to standing toe to toe and having to do the same without weapons.kokirisoldier said:Kind of a personal question. But yes I can, and Yes I have. I've been to Afghanistan and I'm going right back soon. Its very easy to do all you have to do is rationalize it in your head. "This scumbag would kill me and my buddies if HE had the chance, so I'm gonna kill him and his buddies and remove him from the face of the earth".
Most psychopaths are happily walking around and will never kill a man, a lack of empathy doesn't necessitate murder unless you're using the definition of psychopathy that includes the need to kill in order to 'feel'.Arcane Azmadi said:I think I could if they were trying to kill me. I certainly know I'd TRY, but you can never say for sure until you're right in the moment. And if they WERE trying to kill me, I think I could kill them without a scrap of remorse.
Well, that may be putting it a bit overtheatrically, but yes, I agree that I could probably kill a true monster with ease as well. You'd call them "dead inside" but I'd just call them "monsters". The Norway butcher in the recent news for example. If I had my way, I'd spare all the effort of a trial, have him legally reclassified a monster rather than a person for his conscious, willing, deliberate, inhuman and monstrous acts, strip him of his human rights and destroy him, the same way we "destroy" animals that attack humans. Not for emotional reasons like revenge or "eye-for-an-eye" justice, but simply because he's a threat to innocent humans and should be destroyed. And I could take a gun and put a bullet in his head myself, without hesitation, then walk away unflinchingly as the body is doused in petrol and burned.Kaisar said:They say you change after killing a person no matter what the circumstances. It is the ones that show no outer effects that are the truly evil ones. I could do. There are people in this world that are already dead, they just don't know it, and I could easily fix their living "issue". People that rape others. Anyone that harms a child in anyway. These people are already dead inside. Why not make the outside match? It would be doing them and everyone else in the world a favor.
The word you are looking for is "psychopath" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy]. You should be tested to make sure you're not just talking shit on the internet to sound tough, then locked up if you're not.purehatred89 said:I'm a misanthropist. I have no empathy for strangers.Dawn Patrol said:You'd gladly kill a stranger?purehatred89 said:Back at school, my English teacher once said to me I was the most likely student he'd ever met to become a serial killer; I took it as a compliment.
Yes I could kill someone, but it depends. I wouldn't kill my friends or family, but I'd gladly kill a stranger or someone I dislike, however only if I could get away with it.
Dude, why?