Crytek Boss: "Impossible" For New Consoles to Beat PCs

Recommended Videos
Apr 5, 2008
3,736
0
0
This isn't news, this is obvious. Even a 4 year old graphics card alone has more processing power than a current gen console by a huge factor. Still, after Crysis 2, I'll be seriously holding out before buying 3. No chance of a preorder, that's for certain. A sci fi CoD clone designed for consoles....errrrr, no.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
DoomyMcDoom said:
Lemme address this in order, starting with "I don't have anything against computers as a gaming medium.". I use one, although it is not may favorite means of play. So, if there is some way you construe this as an attack, that you should feel personally offended, don't. Now then...

Now then, consoles with features that are there to make them act like computers are an irrelevent detail for the reason you just stated: They're bad at it. It's just a tacked-on, non-central feature, like rolling your sandwich in bacon. Tastes good, but not good FOR you. We can drop the comparisons on that front because they're unimportant. They're not what consoles are FOR. Now, computers are for LOTS of things. That's why they cost a buttload of money. You paid more for your computer, definitely, because - even if it were a gaming computer - it is also going to be able to do any professional work, surf the net, download various things, and so on. This is what it's meant for. A gamming console has one ACTUAL true function: To play games. It is STRICTLY an entertainment device. Even if you play your CDs, MP3s, movies, and other things on it OR even try to use the net, it is all for entertainment and nothing else. You with me so far?

Consoles are not computers in a box. They don't function that way, they do not have that format, and not everything they do even in THIS AGE is interchangeable...save for PERHAPS the X-Box because it's fucking Microsoft. Nintendo and Sony don't have a basis in PCs, so that wouldn't happen. They're not the same, AND they're not built the same. Also, I'm not sure if there's a difference in pricing in Canada, but a good computer to 'outpace' a console doesn't cost $400. Or if it does, it must be nice to live in Canada, but that isn't how things are south of you. (Alternatively, you managed to cut a VERY good and uncommon deal.) Consoles cost less than the kinds of computers you would need for Skyrim, I think.

Additionally, yes shit DOES evolve. PCs do it piece by piece and program by program. Consoles do it generationally. Please don't make such silly comments like Skyrim on NES. That's a bad comparison. I'm very glad that your PC experience has been good for you. Don't knock MY good times in a futile war.
 

Reaper195

New member
Jul 5, 2009
2,055
0
0
Gearhead mk2 said:
Cevat Yerli said:
Blah blah blah glorious pc gaming master race blah blah consoles suck blah graphics are everything blah blah blah.
That's all I'm hearing from this.
The thing is, PC will always be better than console in almost every way. It's a fact. The only advantage I've ever seen that console has is the ability to put a disc in, and play the game. No need to be online, or make accounts, or download/install, etc.

Of course, it never matters how much better PCs are than consoles, or how powerful consoles are. Until we get some better stories with better gameplay, and stop trying to make games as shinier and 'realistic looking' as possible, graphics are pointless. I'd rather play a blocky looking game that's fun than...Crysis 2.
 

sXeth

Elite Member
Legacy
Nov 15, 2012
3,301
676
118
Dryk said:
Seth Carter said:
Yeah, you can't make a 3000 dollar piece of machinery that requires technical know how to assemble and configure for 3-500 dollars pre-assembled and guaranteed to function for anyone.
If you can manage to plug in a console you have 90% of the technical know-how required to assemble a PC
If you're dropping 3000 bucks into it, I think you're getting into a bit more complex then your basic PC. Thats got to include some sort of fancy heatsinks or something, that or people grievously overcharge this guy.
 

DoomyMcDoom

New member
Jul 4, 2008
1,411
0
0
FalloutJack said:
Lemme address this in order, starting with "I don't have anything against computers as a gaming medium.". I use one, although it is not may favorite means of play. So, if there is some way you construe this as an attack, that you should feel personally offended, don't.
I'm not offended.

Now then, consoles with features that are there to make them act like computers are an irrelevent detail for the reason you just stated: They're bad at it. It's just a tacked-on, non-central feature, like rolling your sandwich in bacon. Tastes good, but not good FOR you. We can drop the comparisons on that front because they're unimportant. They're not what consoles are FOR. Now, computers are for LOTS of things. That's why they cost a buttload of money. You paid more for your computer, definitely, because - even if it were a gaming computer - it is also going to be able to do any professional work, surf the net, download various things, and so on. This is what it's meant for. A gamming console has one ACTUAL true function: To play games. It is STRICTLY an entertainment device. Even if you play your CDs, MP3s, movies, and other things on it OR even try to use the net, it is all for entertainment and nothing else. You with me so far?
Umm, no pricing isn't that different here than anywhere else, except maybe out of the way countries where it's hard to find anywhere to buy a computer. www.ncix.com is the website where I procure my parts, and even the parts I bought on sale on there are only like $5 more expensive not on sale, I'm not shitting you it cost me $400 including shipping and shipping insurance, that's not a buttload of money.
Consoles are not computers in a box. They don't function that way, they do not have that format, and not everything they do even in THIS AGE is interchangeable...save for PERHAPS the X-Box because it's fucking Microsoft. Nintendo and Sony don't have a basis in PCs, so that wouldn't happen. They're not the same, AND they're not built the same. Also, I'm not sure if there's a difference in pricing in Canada, but a good computer to 'outpace' a console doesn't cost $400. Or if it does, it must be nice to live in Canada, but that isn't how things are south of you. (Alternatively, you managed to cut a VERY good and uncommon deal.) Consoles cost less than the kinds of computers you would need for Skyrim, I think.
You don't know how consoles work do you? That hardware in the console there, is a computer, the parts in an xbox 360, are 6 year old pc parts, sony is involved in the pc world, as you probably don't know, their whole Vaio product line, includes laptops, desktop pcs, pcs built into monitors/touchscreen monitors, and the PS3 is a pc with a different operating system in it for all intents and purposes, it has a CPU a GPU RAM and a motherboard.
also just so you know, I was running skyrim on a pc that cost me like $400, only that computer I bought 4 years ago, and was about half as powerful as my current system, so yeah, considering cost depreciation, if I were to sell you that computer, I'd only be able to charge you like $50 for it with a clear conscience.
And just so you get the idea, skyrim on that computer, makes skyrim on the xbox/ps3 look like minecraft in texture resolution and visual quality by comparison...
And with a few mods has much better gameplay value too.
Additionally, yes shit DOES evolve. PCs do it piece by piece and program by program. Consoles do it generationally. Please don't make such silly comments like Skyrim on NES. That's a bad comparison. I'm very glad that your PC experience has been good for you. Don't knock MY good times in a futile war.
Not knocking anyone's experience, just pointing out some inconsistencies, so that you or others may learn if you so choose.

Another thing that a lot of people like to say that I'ma knock outa the park before you feel the need to throw them out there, save us both time.
I can plug my pc into a tv, I can plug all sorts of controllers into my computer, and almost every game I have(over 400 at this point, on steam alone, I have many on GOG and I have a big pile of discs, don't feel like counting them all) is capable of being configured to work with almost any given kind of controller, I can use gamepads joysticks steering wheels, even wavystick motion control stuff like the Wii controller.
I have access to my entire game library with ease, I don't even hafta put a disc in!
Also wireless mouse and keyboard if I want to I can play games on a bigscreen tv sitting on my couch, wireless gamepad controller as well. I can stream anything off of the internet, through netflix or off of youtube or any other site off of my tv anytime, and I don't hafta fumble with a controller to type shit in either.
I get games cheap, I can mod them to hell and back, and I don't lose ANY of my library when I choose to upgrade, cuz backwards compatability, hell I can run games for consoles due to using an emulator for those older games that I still own for the PS1/PS2 just pop em into my drive, and play em.

PC is unquestionably the best gaming platform, whether or not it was made for such duties, hell, I know you are likely to throw the quote of how I bought a pc for about $400 4 years ago, back at me, I gave it to someone cuz I was flying across a country bringing nothing but a suitcase with me, I couldn't bother to ship it out with me, just saved time and bought a new one here, so yeah I might've popped more ram and a tuned up video card into it or something, which would've cost me about $100 but that'd just be for the sake of pushing everything that much further. on that system I could still run all of the games available and make em look better than they do on a console, so really not an issue overall when it comes to comparison.

also when you rack up the cost of my steam library(more games than any sane person needs at this point) of over 400 games, and think about how much that library cost me due to steam sales, I'm looking at a cost estimate of I'd say around $500-$700, if you can get a games library of 400 games, and a console to run them, prettier than consoles do now, with mod support, and all sorts of other nifty features for $1200 or less... I'd call that a value win, cuz even if we said you got all those games for your console second hand at $20 a game, you're still spending $8000! So really, who's spending a buttload of money here?
 

dreadedcandiru99

New member
Apr 13, 2009
893
0
0
Doclector said:
Lower pricing for PCs still doesn't change the accessibility issues or the fact that games companies are using the PC's variation and adaptability to pull some ridiculous bullshit with DRM and the like.

Sure, there have been rumours that next gen consoles will pull similiar shit, but until that's confirmed, consoles still have advantage of not being as open to such tactics....not everyone, however, can get their head around PC's technical parts. Not everyone's even comfortable with it, it's not always about sheer technical knowledge, it's about being able to purchase a game with the confidence that it most likely works, not having to worry that it'll disagree with your particular setup.
I've never been that worried about sheer horsepower, myself; as long as the graphics are good enough, and they're not clearly broken, I can deal with them. But yeah, if any of those rumors about the 720/PS4 turn out to be true--mandatory Kinect, no more used games, always-on DRM (on a console! Always-on DRM on a fucking console, for fuck's sake!), PS3 game streaming rather than backwards compatibility (it's like always-on DRM, plus your games are now truly no longer yours!)--that will definitely drive me to PCs. I may not know much about building them, but I'll damned well learn, rather than tolerate this nonsense.
 

Doclector

New member
Aug 22, 2009
5,010
0
0
dreadedcandiru99 said:
Doclector said:
Lower pricing for PCs still doesn't change the accessibility issues or the fact that games companies are using the PC's variation and adaptability to pull some ridiculous bullshit with DRM and the like.

Sure, there have been rumours that next gen consoles will pull similiar shit, but until that's confirmed, consoles still have advantage of not being as open to such tactics....not everyone, however, can get their head around PC's technical parts. Not everyone's even comfortable with it, it's not always about sheer technical knowledge, it's about being able to purchase a game with the confidence that it most likely works, not having to worry that it'll disagree with your particular setup.
I've never been that worried about sheer horsepower, myself; as long as the graphics are good enough, and they're not clearly broken, I can deal with them. But yeah, if any of those rumors about the 720/PS4 turn out to be true--mandatory Kinect, no more used games, always-on DRM (on a console! Always-on DRM on a fucking console, for fuck's sake!), PS3 game streaming rather than backwards compatibility (it's like always-on DRM, plus your games are now truly no longer yours!)--that will definitely drive me to PCs. I may not know much about building them, but I'll damned well learn, rather than tolerate this nonsense.
As much as I hate to admit it, I may have to do the same. Hell, it's not looking like the Wii u's going to offer much for the hardcore market, if it did, I'd probably go crawling back to nintendo apologising for the many times I've cried "BETRAYAAAAL!" for their nigh on abandonment of the hardcore gamers that have stuck by them for so long.

Though, there is the problem that if both hardcore consoles use always on DRM, this may spur even more companies to do it on PC too.
 

dreadedcandiru99

New member
Apr 13, 2009
893
0
0
Doclector said:
dreadedcandiru99 said:
Doclector said:
Lower pricing for PCs still doesn't change the accessibility issues or the fact that games companies are using the PC's variation and adaptability to pull some ridiculous bullshit with DRM and the like.

Sure, there have been rumours that next gen consoles will pull similiar shit, but until that's confirmed, consoles still have advantage of not being as open to such tactics....not everyone, however, can get their head around PC's technical parts. Not everyone's even comfortable with it, it's not always about sheer technical knowledge, it's about being able to purchase a game with the confidence that it most likely works, not having to worry that it'll disagree with your particular setup.
I've never been that worried about sheer horsepower, myself; as long as the graphics are good enough, and they're not clearly broken, I can deal with them. But yeah, if any of those rumors about the 720/PS4 turn out to be true--mandatory Kinect, no more used games, always-on DRM (on a console! Always-on DRM on a fucking console, for fuck's sake!), PS3 game streaming rather than backwards compatibility (it's like always-on DRM, plus your games are now truly no longer yours!)--that will definitely drive me to PCs. I may not know much about building them, but I'll damned well learn, rather than tolerate this nonsense.
As much as I hate to admit it, I may have to do the same. Hell, it's not looking like the Wii u's going to offer much for the hardcore market, if it did, I'd probably go crawling back to nintendo apologising for the many times I've cried "BETRAYAAAAL!" for their nigh on abandonment of the hardcore gamers that have stuck by them for so long.

Though, there is the problem that if both hardcore consoles use always on DRM, this may spur even more companies to do it on PC too.
And of course, if they do, our job as gamers is to make a point of not buying from those companies. I've rejected more than a few games already, for that very reason. I was totally going to get the new SimCity, for example, until they pulled that shit. There are loads of DRM-free PC games to be had out there--I keep hearing good things about GOG.com. And yeah, Steam's basically DRM, but between the loads of extra functions, the constant sales, and (most importantly) the offline mode, I'm willing to accept it.

Console-wise, I'm way, way more psyched for the Ouya and the Steam Box (in whatever form it eventually takes) than the 720 or the PS4. Whatever their eventual shortcomings, at least they're not apparently determined to treat customers like criminals. Between those two and the PC, I think I'll be fine.
 

nyarlathotepsama

New member
Apr 11, 2012
57
0
0
Hmm well my 3000 dollar system (which is fictional but still) had better run Crisis 3 at full graphics or I'll get... annoyed? No that is too much I'd feel more like bothered? or maybe miffed. Hmm no it more likely be indifferent. Yep I'd be indifferent if I couldn't play Crisis 3 at full graphics settings.

I'm a proud PC gamer and I tend to run games at whatever their default settings are graphically because I'm color blind, badly, so I have issues noticing graphical upgrades these days. I also have pretty terrible vision on top of colorblindness and even with corrective devices (of some kind or other) I still doubt I see as well as the norm so graphics beyond the high or even average settings are lost on me. But I likes me mouse and keyboard so won't be trading off for a console any time soon.

Also: Why would any company basically attempt to alienate roughly half their customers? It is pretty much the stupidest thing you can do. Do you hate money? Because if you hate money I'd take it from you without complaining. Do you like scorn? 'Cause I'd heap scorn on you for a share of all that money you seem to want to throw away. Seriously Crytek, the antics of your management amuse me.
 

Aaron Sylvester

New member
Jul 1, 2012
786
0
0
PC master race reporting in.

Cevat is in way over his head if he's thinks visuals are all there is to games. Obviously consoles can't hold a candle to PC's when it comes to visuals/complexity, but they account for only 20-25% (even less for some people) of a game's appeal.

In the end sales determine the success of everything, and $1000+ gaming computers isn't where the sales are happening. 7-year-old consoles are still leading the way.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
DoomyMcDoom said:
Massive Snip
To bring this all to a finely-crafted head...

I AM aware of how consoles work, but they're not made to behave as PCs do, ergo they do not count as one.

My gaming experience (for consoles) hasn't been as expensive as you describe either, so I believe we're both fortunate in our fields.

Comparing console graphics to Minecraft is another very-unrealistic comparison. Graphics engines on either side are way too strong for that to be possible unless we're talking it being on purpose or because it wasn't in the budget.

Controls, storage, and other features between the two are growing more parallel by the day. Steam is a good point, but that's just because Valve is awesome and does good business. (Though, using a controller on a PC... I had a bad experience with trying that. It was utter hell to try and make work, for an MMO that supported it. For that, I prefer to TRY to adapt to the keyboard/mmouse configuration, which I'll never be use to over a controller, sadly.)

What you have is basically a well-informed opinion. That you're not taking any point of my disagreeing with it personally is a good sign. I'm open to new concepts and opinions, of course. I'm not ready to call anyone superior becuase {A} stupid console VS PC war is stupid, {B} it's really a case of six in one, half a dozen in the with the attributes of the two sides anyway, {C} I use BOTH of them anyway 'cause I'm a dynamic player, {D} the industry for either one is hella-strong. These businesses are TOO BIG with too much lucritive cash to earn for one to triumph, so superiority be damned. The playing field is level.
 

Slayer_2

New member
Jul 28, 2008
2,475
0
0
This is pretty obvious, a good PC is like a Lamborghini or Ferrari. A console is like a Honda Civic. It will get you around just as well, and it's usually cheaper to maintain, but it will never compete when it comes to sheer power and (potential) build quality. Although these days the price point between a new gaming PC and a new console is shrinking rapidly. If the next gen retails for $500, another 2-3 hundred could get you a much better PC. Hell my PC was only $550, but I got it used. I've made it last over 5 years now with two minor upgrades (GPU and RAM). The extra money you spend on the PC will soon likely be saved on cheaper game prices.

Also, after Crysis 2, my hopes for this game being good are dashed. Probably another shitty linear corridor FPS. Bring back what Crysis was, and also give us some damn answers for the cliffhanger we were left with in Crysis 1.